|
Post by matt on May 15, 2016 11:14:06 GMT -5
You only need to look at Noel's solo career compared to the Roses' solo careers to prove that point. For me even Beady Eye had better songs than Ian or Squire had solo. Sure, they're better when they're together, but you don't go from distinctly average back to world class just by reuniting two 50-somethings who haven't played together in decades. And obviously they can't just get back to the youthful energy of their early days - or the fuck all attitude from Second Coming. As much as I like Beady Eye, only Flick of the Finger comes anywhere close to Ian Brown's best solo releases imo Don't forget Corpses. Beady Eye would have cut their right arms off for a song like that. Only Flick of the Finger was at that level - a high level because those Brown songs are sensational IMO. P.S. And before anyone gets paranoid and thinks I had it in for Beady Eye from the start, the fact I liked a few songs suggests to me they could and should have done much better.
|
|
|
Post by Headmaster on May 15, 2016 18:01:04 GMT -5
Where are this band?
|
|
|
Post by theyknowwhatimean on May 15, 2016 18:11:24 GMT -5
Behave. Mucky Fingers, albeit not lead single worthy, is a good track and really cool live with the fantastic drumming. I agree, it's one of the best songs on DBTT. Never understood the love/hate polarised opinions on this as it's excellent. Lyrically it's one of Noel's better tunes too, and how it gets compared to Force of Nature is beyond me. It's one of the more driving songs on the album. Now I'm imagining how Liam would have sung it - could have nailed it I think. Not you as well, Matt! I was relying on you being my tag team partner for whenever the need to slag off Mucky Fingers takes me (à la Lock All The Doors). Alas, I shall have to look elsewhere... Calling tomlivesforever! Are you there, Tom??
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 15, 2016 18:14:47 GMT -5
So many negative reactions. At least there isn't a yeah yeah yeah / wooh / nananananananana in All For One.
|
|
|
Post by glider on May 15, 2016 19:13:04 GMT -5
I think some people have gone a bit overboard on the hyperbole and crticism. I don't really know what people were expecting. I, as many of you might have noticed was hugely excited for a new Roses song but my expectations weren't that high. Lets not get it confused The Stone Roses aren't a great band, certainly not by my measure. They are great live have great musicians but that doesn't necessarily constitute great songwriters, the two can be very separate. The first album is a classic, in my top 5, they had a purple patch and everything came together for the songs and the sound they produced but it can't be replicated. You only have to look as far as The Second Coming which I really like but it does sound like a band perhaps not well stocked with idea's or a least the songwriting craft to recreate something close to the glory of there debut. The truth is they released one classic and one half decent album, what would you take from any other band who had done that? Would you consider them greats? The difference is the Roses dissappeared for 20 years and this huge myth built up around them rasing expectations that should never have really been there. Take Oasis for example, you could argue that Noel had a 2 1/2 album purple patch but the difference with Oasis was that whatever you think of what followed Noel was always capable of 3 or 4 absolute belters. He's a proven songwriter. The Roses just aren't. Great post. I will say I kind of got extremely overboard with the disappointment the past couple of days mainly because of how much hate the band were getting on here. It's sucks to see that. The track just exists for me - it's not that good and doesn't sound like the Roses at all, or at least the Roses I expect to sound. People who expect them to release something as good as the debut might as well not have any interest in them now because it won't happen. You're not getting songs like that anymore. I'm a big fan of Second Coming and expected their sound to be akin to that, great alternative rock tracks with a more modern, jammy groove (like Daybreak), with some more harsh, psychedelic rock works instead of the hazy summer psychedelic 60s style pop/dance stuff. Begging You kind of material as well, with Squire having at it on the guitar, Mani distributing superb basslines and Reni reigning as the groovemaster. I'm fine knowing they may not create a song as good as Made of Stone again, but surely tunes like Tightrope and Begging You, or Breaking into Heaven and Daybreak aren't out of their reach right? Another reason for the brilliance of the debut is mostly Leckie in all honesty. He probably gave them a considerable amount of input to better the tunes. Remember Adored started out as a post punk track in their garage flower days (check out the live performances, they're bad!), and look what became of it! A psychedelic, yet simplistic groovy track. Like Tom says, Roses as themselves get alot of hype surrounding them because of being silent, the obscurity of their PR, and not releasing new material in over 2 decades.
|
|
|
Post by glider on May 15, 2016 19:13:32 GMT -5
I agree, it's one of the best songs on DBTT. Never understood the love/hate polarised opinions on this as it's excellent. Lyrically it's one of Noel's better tunes too, and how it gets compared to Force of Nature is beyond me. It's one of the more driving songs on the album. Now I'm imagining how Liam would have sung it - could have nailed it I think. Not you as well, Matt! I was relying on you being my tag team partner for whenever the need to slag off Mucky Fingers takes me (à la Lock All The Doors). Alas, I shall have to look elsewhere... Calling tomlivesforever ! Are you there, Tom?? Mucky Fingers is ass.
|
|
|
Post by glider on May 15, 2016 19:31:48 GMT -5
Not sure why you expect them to write another Elephant Stone.
|
|
|
Post by matt on May 15, 2016 19:34:05 GMT -5
I agree, it's one of the best songs on DBTT. Never understood the love/hate polarised opinions on this as it's excellent. Lyrically it's one of Noel's better tunes too, and how it gets compared to Force of Nature is beyond me. It's one of the more driving songs on the album. Now I'm imagining how Liam would have sung it - could have nailed it I think. Not you as well, Matt! I was relying on you being my tag team partner for whenever the need to slag off Mucky Fingers takes me (à la Lock All The Doors). Alas, I shall have to look elsewhere... Calling tomlivesforever! Are you there, Tom?? Sorry to disappoint! What's is it you don't like about if you don't mind me asking?! My dislike of Lock All The Doors is exactly the same reasoning as yours, so would be interesting to hear you're take on Mucky Fingers.
|
|
|
Post by theyknowwhatimean on May 15, 2016 20:02:48 GMT -5
Not you as well, Matt! I was relying on you being my tag team partner for whenever the need to slag off Mucky Fingers takes me (à la Lock All The Doors). Alas, I shall have to look elsewhere... Calling tomlivesforever ! Are you there, Tom?? Sorry to disappoint! What's is it you don't like about if you don't mind me asking?! My dislike of Lock All The Doors is exactly the same reasoning as yours, so would be interesting to hear you're take on Mucky Fingers. Same sort of thing as with Lock All The Doors, really. Find it generic and plodding, and badly produced, and for the life of me can't fathom why it was Noel who ended up singing it. The rockers-that-don't-really-rock, with boring drum tracks, and Noel's vocals when they should've had Liam's, has been the one real drawback to Noel's songwriting since it got pretty good again in the mid-00s, in my opinion.
|
|
|
Post by theyknowwhatimean on May 15, 2016 20:03:58 GMT -5
Also, that harmonica can fuck right off...
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on May 15, 2016 21:59:40 GMT -5
While I do like the Stone Roses, they're almost destined to fail with a release 22 years after their last album, and 20 years since the band split.
Times are so much different now - the lads that grew up with them now have families. The musical landscape has changed - for better and/or for worse. And to think these scruffy lads can just comeback as middle-aged men and recreate the magic they did two decades prior is asking more than a lot.
Take a note, Oasis, and don't take ages to reform for you, too, would fall into the same trap.
The Stone Roses belonged in the 80s (early 90s, if being pedantic).
My prediction: Band will get a lukewarm reception - mainly due to resting on their laurels. Will be comparable to DGSS and Beady Eye's initial reaction.
All For One SOUNDS like Beady Eye, and has all the marketing hallmarks of a Bring the Light release.
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on May 15, 2016 22:02:29 GMT -5
Not you as well, Matt! I was relying on you being my tag team partner for whenever the need to slag off Mucky Fingers takes me (à la Lock All The Doors). Alas, I shall have to look elsewhere... Calling tomlivesforever ! Are you there, Tom?? Mucky Fingers is ass. Walk on.
|
|
|
Post by glider on May 15, 2016 22:14:14 GMT -5
Walk on. GREAT SONG!
|
|
|
Post by carlober on May 16, 2016 3:11:01 GMT -5
Walk on. GREAT SONG! And the single version is even better!
|
|
|
Post by supersonic1983 on May 16, 2016 9:34:10 GMT -5
Only Flick of the Finger was at that level - a high level because those Brown songs are sensational IMO. I really rate Ian Brown as a solo artist. If you were to disregard every song that made it onto The Greatest I reckon there'd be enough first-rate material left over for a second compilation album.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 16, 2016 11:33:42 GMT -5
While I do like the Stone Roses, they're almost destined to fail with a release 22 years after their last album, and 20 years since the band split. Times are so much different now - the lads that grew up with them now have families. The musical landscape has changed - for better and/or for worse. And to think these scruffy lads can just comeback as middle-aged men and recreate the magic they did two decades prior is asking more than a lot. Take a note, Oasis, and don't take ages to reform for you, too, would fall into the same trap. The Stone Roses belonged in the 80s (early 90s, if being pedantic). My prediction: Band will get a lukewarm reception - mainly due to resting on their laurels. Will be comparable to DGSS and Beady Eye's initial reaction. All For One SOUNDS like Beady Eye, and has all the marketing hallmarks of a Bring the Light release. I don't remember Beady Eye selling out a 60,000 capacity stadium four times over, without even releasing any new material.Feel like I'm the only one left defending the Roses on here
|
|
|
Post by glider on May 16, 2016 12:22:43 GMT -5
While I do like the Stone Roses, they're almost destined to fail with a release 22 years after their last album, and 20 years since the band split. Times are so much different now - the lads that grew up with them now have families. The musical landscape has changed - for better and/or for worse. And to think these scruffy lads can just comeback as middle-aged men and recreate the magic they did two decades prior is asking more than a lot. Take a note, Oasis, and don't take ages to reform for you, too, would fall into the same trap. The Stone Roses belonged in the 80s (early 90s, if being pedantic). My prediction: Band will get a lukewarm reception - mainly due to resting on their laurels. Will be comparable to DGSS and Beady Eye's initial reaction. All For One SOUNDS like Beady Eye, and has all the marketing hallmarks of a Bring the Light release. I don't remember Beady Eye selling out a 60,000 capacity stadium four times over, without even releasing any new material.Feel like I'm the only one left defending the Roses on here Hey I'm here! It's okay if you like the song. I've grown to see the Roses have two crowds: those who appreciate the creative substance and stylism in their music and those who embrace the lad rock cult following of them.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 16, 2016 17:43:59 GMT -5
I don't remember Beady Eye selling out a 60,000 capacity stadium four times over, without even releasing any new material.Feel like I'm the only one left defending the Roses on here Hey I'm here! It's okay if you like the song. I've grown to see the Roses have two crowds: those who appreciate the creative substance and stylism in their music and those who embrace the lad rock cult following of them. I'm definitely not part of the lad rock cult, I assure you! I'm not a Roses optimist, you see a lot of them on Don't Stop, believing this is just some sort of joke and the real material is right around the corner. Then there's the pessimists (a lot of you on here!) who genuinely believe that Bring The Light is better than All For One, which I really struggle to comprehend. I like to think of myself as a realist. All For One is a great song and I'm glad they released it. But it's not as good as Ride On
|
|
|
Post by glider on May 16, 2016 20:04:05 GMT -5
Do you know what I really want to hear? The original Paul Schroeder mix of Second Coming.
|
|
|
Post by morning_rain on May 18, 2016 16:41:51 GMT -5
I don't know if this has been posted before but...
|
|
|
Post by tomlivesforever on May 18, 2016 18:11:34 GMT -5
I agree, it's one of the best songs on DBTT. Never understood the love/hate polarised opinions on this as it's excellent. Lyrically it's one of Noel's better tunes too, and how it gets compared to Force of Nature is beyond me. It's one of the more driving songs on the album. Now I'm imagining how Liam would have sung it - could have nailed it I think. Not you as well, Matt! I was relying on you being my tag team partner for whenever the need to slag off Mucky Fingers takes me (à la Lock All The Doors). Alas, I shall have to look elsewhere... Calling tomlivesforever! Are you there, Tom?? Haha not sure I can help you mate. I don't hate Mucky Fingers while definitely not a fan. I do reserve a speacial hatred for Force of Nature though.
|
|
|
Post by batfink30 on May 18, 2016 18:42:13 GMT -5
rfb enjoying the nice weather with his mates last week ;-)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 27, 2016 9:56:12 GMT -5
That friday
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 27, 2016 10:56:51 GMT -5
Over the moon that I'm going to be seeing The Stone Roses AND Public Enemy on the same day!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 27, 2016 17:41:26 GMT -5
Over the moon that I'm going to be seeing The Stone Roses AND Public Enemy on the same day! I'll raise you a Primal Scream, Public Enemy AND The Chuckle Brothers on the same day oxford.commonpeople.net/line-up
|
|