|
Post by allingoodtime on Jun 10, 2014 11:21:00 GMT -5
Looking back a year after it's release, I'm still happy with it. Beady Eye did what I wanted them to do. Get a real producer and add much scope and musical depth to their songs. I think it towers over their debut. Lyrics still need work but the landscape of sounds is tremendous compared to DGSS. Hopefully a third LP is 2-3 years away. Agreed i'm still happy with it, deserved more sales tbh but I think thats more down to the poor management
|
|
|
Post by Fishtank on Jun 10, 2014 13:13:17 GMT -5
Below average. Two good songs. The rest are 5/10 or worse. Ridiculous single choices. A most forgettable album.
|
|
|
Post by bardes on Jun 10, 2014 14:15:32 GMT -5
Wow, I voted "great" 8-7. Now I'm not sure about it... I think 'good' (6 ) is better option.
|
|
|
Post by mkoasis on Jun 10, 2014 20:10:44 GMT -5
I still really love this album. As good as any latter day Oasis album - and that's not a slight in the slightest.
I'm not keen on Face the Crowd but I see why its on there. It is overly repetitive and goes on way to long but does have its merits (the quadrophenia feel, "turn you eyes to me" bit). Shouldnt have gone past the 3 min mark.
I don't care for DBM much either. Lyrically, its brutal and musically, its a spaced out, inferior version of GGTIA. Seems like it was put on the album for publicity. Girls in Uniform would have definitely been better at this track 8 spot.
Beyond that, love the album. Bonus tracks are a real joy but I'm not sure how they would have fit on the album flow-wise. Would have saved them for an EP or something.
|
|
|
Post by The Invisible Sun on Jun 10, 2014 20:35:22 GMT -5
My score 7-8 hasn't changed after a year of listening. Still really dig the album.
|
|
shock
Madferrit Fan
You know you should, so I guess you might as well...
Posts: 88
|
Post by shock on Jun 10, 2014 23:04:52 GMT -5
I still enjoy most of the album today. Last year, I gave it 9 out of 10. Now I think I would give it 8 out of 10.
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Jun 11, 2014 2:30:24 GMT -5
Wow, those rose tinted glasses upon release were very fucking red. I have since taken them off. I never, ever, get the urge to listen to Beady Eye. But when I do, I admit that I do enjoy it. But there's just so much wrong with this album -- 20 agonizing seconds of nothingness at the end of Soon Comes Tomorrow
- 4 Minutes. FOUR MINUTES. FOUR FUCKING MINUTES of PURE GOD DAMNED NOTHINGNESS at the "End" of Don't Brother Me SERIOUSLY, WHAT THE FUCK? WHY?
- Don't Brother Me is also Little James 2.0.....AND DID I MENTION 4 FUCKING MINUTES OF WASTED FUCKING TIME?
- Shine Alight is pisspoor and annoying as fuck
- Ballroom Figurine is the most cringe-worthy Oasis related song since A Bell Will Fucking Ring
[/u] - FOTR is brilliant
- I always liked SBOTA
- I'm Just Sayin is fantastic retro-Oasis at its best (easily could be a bside from 1996 or 1997), and is easily my favorite. I wish Oasis kept that kind of sound.
- Soon Come Tomorrow reminds me of Gas Panic mixed with a tinge of Champagne Supernova, and actually works well enough.
- And Start Anew is really good (as is Off at the Next Exit - which should have replaced Ballroom, and would have been the album's "Don't Go Away").
|
|
|
Post by bardes on Jun 11, 2014 4:10:37 GMT -5
Wow, those rose tinted glasses upon release were very fucking red. I have since taken them off. I never, ever, get the urge to listen to Beady Eye. But when I do, I admit that I do enjoy it. But there's just so much wrong with this album -- 20 agonizing seconds of nothingness at the end of Soon Comes Tomorrow
- 4 Minutes. FOUR MINUTES. FOUR FUCKING MINUTES of PURE GOD DAMNED NOTHINGNESS at the "End" of Don't Brother Me SERIOUSLY, WHAT THE FUCK? WHY?
Have you ever listened to Pink Floyd? Enjoy the silence.
|
|
|
Post by defmaybe00 on Jun 11, 2014 4:35:14 GMT -5
6-7/10
|
|
|
Post by His Royal Noelness on Jun 11, 2014 6:10:54 GMT -5
Honestly can't remember the last time I listened to it. Gave it a few spins when it came out but it just sounds like the same old stuff but with atmospheric sounds at the start and end of each track. Couple of songs I liked but on the whole a rather forgettable effort.
|
|
|
Post by Jim on Jun 11, 2014 6:19:29 GMT -5
Cracking set of tunes on the deluxe edition. I still listen to the album quite regularly, more than DGSS or HFB.
Evil Eye shoulda been on the album rather than Ballroom Figured though and the 42.42 mix of Don't Brother Me would've been better than the album version.
Flick, Soul Love and Start Anew are my favourites.
|
|
|
Post by Fishtank on Jun 11, 2014 6:21:04 GMT -5
FOTF is vastly overrated imo. The first time I heard it I didnt rate it all. After a few listens It got slightly better. But the way some on here go on about it is ridiculous. Good tune but no better than 6.5/10
|
|
|
Post by tomlivesforever on Jun 11, 2014 8:10:55 GMT -5
FOTF is vastly overrated imo. The first time I heard it I didnt rate it all. After a few listens It got slightly better. But the way some on here go on about it is ridiculous. Good tune but no better than 6.5/10 Yeah totally ridiculous that people would think its great. Everyone will probably change there mind now and give it 6.5/10...
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Jun 11, 2014 8:29:42 GMT -5
Cracking set of tunes on the deluxe edition. I still listen to the album quite regularly, more than DGSS or HFB. Evil Eye shoulda been on the album rather than Ballroom Figured though and the 42.42 mix of Don't Brother Me would've been better than the album version. Flick, Soul Love and Start Anew are my favourites. The bonus tunes were outrageously strong. Many of them should have been on "BE". Either way the fans got a nice treat.
|
|
|
Post by allingoodtime on Jun 11, 2014 8:53:10 GMT -5
This album was my summer album last year, i'm not really into a lot of bands tbh, especially not new bands and I find it hard to find songs I like nowadays. BE was a very good effort imo
|
|
|
Post by Gas Panic on Jun 11, 2014 13:37:58 GMT -5
I would say its a strong 6 or a weak 7.
6.5
Imagine this album with the weaker songs taken off, the lyrics improved a bit and 3 strong Noel Gallagher written single added, like IIHAG / WAL / EOTR.
The 8th Oasis album could have been incredible.
|
|
|
Post by bardes on Jun 11, 2014 14:17:58 GMT -5
I would say its a strong 6 or a weak 7. 6.5 Imagine this album with the weaker songs taken off, the lyrics improved a bit and 3 strong Noel Gallagher written single added, like IIHAG / WAL / EOTR. The 8th Oasis album could have been incredible. Imagine that McCartney created entire album with Jagger and Richards. And David Gilmour on guitar. The first Gallagher-McCartney-Jagger-Richards album coud have been incredible.
|
|
|
Post by Gas Panic on Jun 11, 2014 15:54:40 GMT -5
I would say its a strong 6 or a weak 7. 6.5 Imagine this album with the weaker songs taken off, the lyrics improved a bit and 3 strong Noel Gallagher written single added, like IIHAG / WAL / EOTR. The 8th Oasis album could have been incredible. Imagine that McCartney created entire album with Jagger and Richards. And David Gilmour on guitar. The first Gallagher-McCartney-Jagger-Richards album coud have been incredible. Yeah mate, except Noel Gallagher actually was in a group with this lot only a few years previous to the release of BE, and had been in a band for over 15 years previous to this. Plus Noel was clearly holding back his strongest material for years. This is generally accepted throughout the Oasis community. Noel's input into what became BE therefore COULD have created the most exciting Oasis album since the 90s.
|
|
|
Post by The Milkman & The Riverman on Jun 11, 2014 16:16:15 GMT -5
I can't hear nothing special in any of the bonus tracks. I would replace maybe Ballroom Figured with one of them but that's it. Rest of it should stay as B sides. The album as a whole is good and i played it the whole year but i can't really find the reason why i like it so much. I shouldn't and i thought i won't the first time i heard it cause it has 5 totally acoustic songs. Half of this album is really acoustic guitar, Liam's voice, and a bit of effects. For some reason it's really playful, the acousitc ones work well with the rockin ones. There's no big tunes really on it and i still like it. I don't know what it is really. I think the main reason why we really like this album is the cover. And it was intentional. Put a nipples picture on the cover and all the fuckers will buy it. That's the whole secret
|
|
|
Post by The Invisible Sun on Jun 11, 2014 17:53:57 GMT -5
I can't hear nothing special in any of the bonus tracks. I would replace maybe Ballroom Figured with one of them but that's it. Rest of it should stay as B sides. The album as a whole is good and i played it the whole year but i can't really find the reason why i like it so much. I shouldn't and i thought i won't the first time i heard it cause it has 5 totally acoustic songs. Half of this album is really acoustic guitar, Liam's voice, and a bit of effects. For some reason it's really playful, the acousitc ones work well with the rockin ones. There's no big tunes really on it and i still like it. I don't know what it is really. I think the main reason why we really like this album is the cover. And it was intentional. Put a nipples picture on the cover and all the fuckers will buy it. That's the whole secret If they combined the rockers from DGSS and the vision for BE as a goal for a third album, that should be perfect. I think the nipples might have hurt their sales a little bit, especially in sensitive countries like the United States where any form of nudity is some sort of tragedy. But in general, you're right. The nipples were intentional. They wanted to turn heads. But what impression does that give? Like they're desperate for attention. Might as well be a slasher film throwing in sex and tits because they know everything else about the movie is piss poor. Only BE didn't need to turn heads or stir up any controversy, the music should have sold itself. Who's Beady Eye's target audience anyway? Lots of people from Oasis days surely, but aren't there a whole new generation of teens into the music? If you look for covers of Beady Eye tunes on youtube, that seems to be the case. A bunch of kids singing and strumming away to songs on both albums.
|
|
|
Post by The Milkman & The Riverman on Jun 11, 2014 18:06:55 GMT -5
I can't hear nothing special in any of the bonus tracks. I would replace maybe Ballroom Figured with one of them but that's it. Rest of it should stay as B sides. The album as a whole is good and i played it the whole year but i can't really find the reason why i like it so much. I shouldn't and i thought i won't the first time i heard it cause it has 5 totally acoustic songs. Half of this album is really acoustic guitar, Liam's voice, and a bit of effects. For some reason it's really playful, the acousitc ones work well with the rockin ones. There's no big tunes really on it and i still like it. I don't know what it is really. I think the main reason why we really like this album is the cover. And it was intentional. Put a nipples picture on the cover and all the fuckers will buy it. That's the whole secret If they combined the rockers from DGSS and the vision for BE as a goal for a third album, that should be perfect. I think the nipples might have hurt their sales a little bit, especially in sensitive countries like the United States where any form of nudity is some sort of tragedy. But in general, you're right. The nipples were intentional. They wanted to turn heads. But what impression does that give? Like they're desperate for attention. Might as well be a slasher film throwing in sex and tits because they know everything else about the movie is piss poor. Only BE didn't need to turn heads or stir up any controversy, the music should have sold itself. Who's Beady Eye's target audience anyway? Lots of people from Oasis days surely, but aren't there a whole new generation of teens into the music? If you look for covers of Beady Eye tunes on youtube, that seems to be the case. A bunch of kids singing and strumming away to songs on both albums. I was joking actually. Of course it's not for the attention or turning heads. It's just looks cool
|
|
|
Post by The Invisible Sun on Jun 11, 2014 19:24:50 GMT -5
If they combined the rockers from DGSS and the vision for BE as a goal for a third album, that should be perfect. I think the nipples might have hurt their sales a little bit, especially in sensitive countries like the United States where any form of nudity is some sort of tragedy. But in general, you're right. The nipples were intentional. They wanted to turn heads. But what impression does that give? Like they're desperate for attention. Might as well be a slasher film throwing in sex and tits because they know everything else about the movie is piss poor. Only BE didn't need to turn heads or stir up any controversy, the music should have sold itself. Who's Beady Eye's target audience anyway? Lots of people from Oasis days surely, but aren't there a whole new generation of teens into the music? If you look for covers of Beady Eye tunes on youtube, that seems to be the case. A bunch of kids singing and strumming away to songs on both albums. I was joking actually. Of course it's not for the attention or turning heads. It's just looks cool You might have have been joking, but I think the joke happens to be true. It doesn't simply look cool, it looks sexy. That's a stronger, more specific reaction. If you were in the store, completely unaware of Beady Eye and as you passed by it you caught a glimpse of the cover, would you not stop?
|
|
|
Post by The Milkman & The Riverman on Jun 11, 2014 19:38:04 GMT -5
I was joking actually. Of course it's not for the attention or turning heads. It's just looks cool You might have have been joking, but I think the joke happens to be true. It doesn't simply look cool, it looks sexy. That's a stronger, more specific reaction. If you were in the store, completely unaware of Beady Eye and as you passed by it you caught a glimpse of the cover, would you not stop? Surely, but that's what covers do anyway. If i was in store, and passed Be Here Now unaware of Oasis i'd stop either.
|
|
|
Post by The Invisible Sun on Jun 11, 2014 20:21:47 GMT -5
You might have have been joking, but I think the joke happens to be true. It doesn't simply look cool, it looks sexy. That's a stronger, more specific reaction. If you were in the store, completely unaware of Beady Eye and as you passed by it you caught a glimpse of the cover, would you not stop? Surely, but that's what covers do anyway. If i was in store, and passed Be Here Now unaware of Oasis i'd stop either. True, but that's due to an interesting design rather than a half naked chick. I think the latter is a bit too easy. Although, in BE's defense, it's an easily identifiable album cover, which is probably why they didn't bother with a band logo or title on the front cover.
|
|
|
Post by LlAM on Jun 12, 2014 11:14:03 GMT -5
FOUR FUCKING MINUTES, though. Like what the actual fuckkkkkkkk? Those four minutes are the best four minutes on the album !!
|
|