|
Post by SallyIsTheMainCharacter on Sept 4, 2024 18:12:12 GMT -5
Regarding cancelling resealing ticket from viagogo/stubhub, I used to work at theatre box office and we were able to restrict stubhub from listing any resales, and requests all information( the email, name, seat number, etc) to void the ticket. Say the promoter just ask viagogo to provide these info and send to the Ticketmaster, sure it can be done. But then, all the voided and relisted tickets sure will triggered the dynamic pricing algorithm lmao( sorry Im so stucked to what they plan to do?
|
|
|
Post by neila83 on Sept 4, 2024 18:23:28 GMT -5
Half are thick as shit .. the band have said that dynamic pricing was nothing to do with them and didn’t agree to it hence the reason they are cancelling viagogo tickets and putting out tickets for those selected in the presale .. most are moaning because they are catering for the demand.. to cater for it they need to do 150 nights at Wembley .. folks have lost the plot Hi Marcus.
|
|
|
Post by galli on Sept 5, 2024 6:49:33 GMT -5
Why on earth are there people complaining about this dynamic ticket pricing???
Absolutely noone forced you to buy tickets at such an insane price.
It is everyones free choice.
Before there was this dynamic pricing a lot tickets would go to the second market and would be sold there at insane rates.
But this way ticketmaster and the hopefully the band will participate in the demand.
If you have the feeling that it is too expensive then dont buy it, simple as that.
|
|
|
Post by tomlivesforever on Sept 5, 2024 7:15:38 GMT -5
Why on earth are there people complaining about this dynamic ticket pricing??? Absolutely noone forced you to buy tickets at such an insane price. It is everyones free choice. Before there was this dynamic pricing a lot tickets would go to the second market and would be sold there at insane rates. But this way ticketmaster and the hopefully the band will participate in the demand. If you have the feeling that it is too expensive then dont buy it, simple as that. It's exploitative, obviously. Cartel shit. Anyway it seems to be sorted going forward which is great.
|
|
|
Post by neila83 on Sept 5, 2024 7:19:49 GMT -5
Whether they knew about the specifics or not, it's fairly clear the general direction from Noel and Liam was 'make as much money as possible from as few gigs as possible' i.e. maximum capacity venues, maximum tolerable pricing.
Which is definitely contrary to what they used to do where I have seen at least Noel say they tried to keep ticket prices as low as possible, and looking back at Oasis gigs, prices were very reasonable. They did used to at least try to maintain their image of being the 'people's band' even if on the last tour particularly they were really just a brand fulfilling contractual requirements, completely phoning in the gigs. We can safely say no such desire was passed down from Noel and Liam for this tour - if they had told management to try and keep prices as reasonable as possible, or that maybe £30m each would have been acceptable rather than £50m, obviously management decisions would have been different.
People talk about how much it costs to put on gigs, but if they're getting £50m each there's obviously quite a lot of margin there!
|
|
|
Post by themanwholivesinhell on Sept 5, 2024 7:46:59 GMT -5
Why on earth are there people complaining about this dynamic ticket pricing??? Absolutely noone forced you to buy tickets at such an insane price. It is everyones free choice. Before there was this dynamic pricing a lot tickets would go to the second market and would be sold there at insane rates. But this way ticketmaster and the hopefully the band will participate in the demand. If you have the feeling that it is too expensive then dont buy it, simple as that. It's exploitative, obviously. Cartel shit. Anyway it seems to be sorted going forward which is great. As much as I want to believe so, I am struggling to see just how they can attain public forgiveness outside of diehard fans, and save their reputation. I don’t know how they’ll silence people about this. As public just responded to the extra gig announcement like it had been planned all along just to make more. I personally think the answer is some sort of long-term thing on Ticketmaster where if you prove you paid above list price for a ticket, you get the difference back. But tbh, even if they did that, people will just whinge “it’s not enough, you owe me more for that time i spent queuing!”
|
|
|
Post by jaq515 on Sept 5, 2024 8:40:36 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by supersonic84 on Sept 5, 2024 9:20:45 GMT -5
Why on earth are there people complaining about this dynamic ticket pricing??? Absolutely noone forced you to buy tickets at such an insane price.
It is everyones free choice. Before there was this dynamic pricing a lot tickets would go to the second market and would be sold there at insane rates. But this way ticketmaster and the hopefully the band will participate in the demand. If you have the feeling that it is too expensive then dont buy it, simple as that. Because the prices were advertised on the ticket sites well in advance of sales so fans then knew what option to budget for and what their upper limits of spending were. At NO time beforehand were fans informed that a 'dynamic pricing' policy was going to be implemented just because of demand. Its absolutely fan exploitation by whoever made the decision to apply the dynamic pricing. Fans queued for hours only to get to the front of the queue and find their budget had been blown out the water due to corporate greed. Nobody was forced to buy, that much is true but I can guarantee you many felt pressured into paying over the odds because they didn't want to miss out on this, whoever made the call on the pricing knew this and adjusted prices accordingly to bleed fans dry. As for the last bit in bold, maybe you're lucky and in a financial position that allows you buy top bracket tickets, but not everyone is lucky enough to be in that position. People are literally living month to month just now due to various cost of living issues leaving very little disposable income to go to one off things like concerts.
|
|
|
Post by andymorris on Sept 5, 2024 10:12:31 GMT -5
Whether they knew about the specifics or not, it's fairly clear the general direction from Noel and Liam was 'make as much money as possible from as few gigs as possible' i.e. maximum capacity venues, maximum tolerable pricing. Which is definitely contrary to what they used to do where I have seen at least Noel say they tried to keep ticket prices as low as possible, and looking back at Oasis gigs, prices were very reasonable. They did used to at least try to maintain their image of being the 'people's band' even if on the last tour particularly they were really just a brand fulfilling contractual requirements, completely phoning in the gigs. We can safely say no such desire was passed down from Noel and Liam for this tour - if they had told management to try and keep prices as reasonable as possible, or that maybe £30m each would have been acceptable rather than £50m, obviously management decisions would have been different. People talk about how much it costs to put on gigs, but if they're getting £50m each there's obviously quite a lot of margin there! Yeah, but in the end, people dont seem to care. They want to see the Gallaghers sing Wonderwall for them at any cost. Values are not "in" anymore. All that matters is the "now". Oasis used to have values. Its the biggest rock n roll swindle to be honest : Oasis standing ticket in 2009 was 40 Oasis standing ticket in 2024 is 150 Inflation since 2009 is 1,47 for 1 Oasis standing ticket should have been roughly 60 Reasonably, since its the comeback of the millenium, let's say 80 or even 90 including fee could have been acceptable. That's almost half of what people paid... before dynamic pricing. And they still would have earned many, many millions. Taking into account other gigs, they will make what 100, 150 millions each ? Do they really need that much money ? Is that needed to strum an acoustic guitar in a basement in a mansion ? Is Sarah McDonald's make up that expensive ? There is something a bit wrong here. They're gonna come on stage and sing that we need each other and other very heartful/universal messages like that. A bit ironic.
|
|
|
Post by monkian on Sept 5, 2024 10:29:34 GMT -5
Why on earth are there people complaining about this dynamic ticket pricing??? Absolutely noone forced you to buy tickets at such an insane price. It is everyones free choice. Before there was this dynamic pricing a lot tickets would go to the second market and would be sold there at insane rates. But this way ticketmaster and the hopefully the band will participate in the demand. If you have the feeling that it is too expensive then dont buy it, simple as that. Added to the points above about the cartel nature of exploiting people who were led to believe that tickets were much less than £355, I'd add that those of us who did pay did so after 7 hours of emotion in the queue. I thought it through and decided to proceed after talking it out with the wife (last chance to see my fave band of all time, 3 miles from house etc, no hotels/travel - just me going etc), but others may not have and just pressed "buy" because they'd spent so long queueing and just wanted tickets for the effort they'd put in. Also, the fact that these "in demand" tickets were priced at more than the better VIP / Experience tickets that were originally advertised, is downright immoral. I care much less about people paying less than i for a similar ticket but I'm really annoyed that some people who went in with a bigger budget paid less and then get a lot more than me, just because more people wanted my GA Heaton Park ticket. Were the VIP tickets subject to dynamic pricing too? Did dynamic pricing come into play after they'd sold out? Something doesn't stack up and I hope someone finds out what. The least they can do is give us something extra - a programme, a t-shirt, a VIP bar, a gold plated bottle to piss in at the front of the crowd, whatever. It's literally going to be impossible to make it up to anyone though. There will be people who backed out because of the high price, who will be peeved if we all get a refund because they'll say they should have had tickets in the first place. Even if we get a free hat, how will they police the passing on of said hat if we decide to resell. And of course, those of us with in demand tickets are now not allowed to buy cheaper tickets to the new Wembley gigs when they go on sale. If the new dates were always an option, there will be a lot of people who would have took their chances on them instead of overpaying. The word "fiasco" is an understatement.
|
|
|
Post by resurrection89 on Sept 5, 2024 11:45:16 GMT -5
The change in the way people purchase music hasn’t helped inflated ticket prices. 30 years ago when DM, WTSMG came out the band would’ve made millions from the cd sales. Now millions of people don’t pay anything for their music so bands miss out. I personally am not a fan of this; If a band make a mega LP then they deserve to get money from their fans. The only way it’s profitable is through gigs
Liam even mentions it tongue and cheek in that funny clip where he’s making tea
|
|
|
Post by jaq515 on Sept 5, 2024 12:23:02 GMT -5
Whether they knew about the specifics or not, it's fairly clear the general direction from Noel and Liam was 'make as much money as possible from as few gigs as possible' i.e. maximum capacity venues, maximum tolerable pricing. Which is definitely contrary to what they used to do where I have seen at least Noel say they tried to keep ticket prices as low as possible, and looking back at Oasis gigs, prices were very reasonable. They did used to at least try to maintain their image of being the 'people's band' even if on the last tour particularly they were really just a brand fulfilling contractual requirements, completely phoning in the gigs. We can safely say no such desire was passed down from Noel and Liam for this tour - if they had told management to try and keep prices as reasonable as possible, or that maybe £30m each would have been acceptable rather than £50m, obviously management decisions would have been different. People talk about how much it costs to put on gigs, but if they're getting £50m each there's obviously quite a lot of margin there! Yeah, but in the end, people dont seem to care. They want to see the Gallaghers sing Wonderwall for them at any cost. Values are not "in" anymore. All that matters is the "now". Oasis used to have values. Its the biggest rock n roll swindle to be honest : Oasis standing ticket in 2009 was 40 Oasis standing ticket in 2024 is 150 Inflation since 2009 is 1,47 for 1 Oasis standing ticket should have been roughly 60 Reasonably, since its the comeback of the millenium, let's say 80 or even 90 including fee could have been acceptable. That's almost half of what people paid... before dynamic pricing. And they still would have earned many, many millions. Taking into account other gigs, they will make what 100, 150 millions each ? Do they really need that much money ? Is that needed to strum an acoustic guitar in a basement in a mansion ? Is Sarah McDonald's make up that expensive ? There is something a bit wrong here. They're gonna come on stage and sing that we need each other and other very heartful/universal messages like that. A bit ironic. as resurrection89 says its related to how much cost of music has changed I could be wrong as cant remember but am sure say in '94 cd's cost £15+ so if you use that inflation which is nearly 200% 30 years later a cd cost us £30 in todays money. Even the oasis singles were 3.99 so again £8 in todays money which is same price as an album now (IF you choose to buy) Fast forward to 09 and cd's were maybe £8 for standard edition and obv they were starting to try and claw money out of the music by releasing the special editions albums, boxsets pretty much standard vs ltd edition etc. You could look back at gigs in 94 and say they were £5 in 94 800% inflation is ridiculous at £40 but obv circumstances had changed massively, they were a huge band but also they were very rich by then but obv no one even blinked.. That same time has now passed again and circumstances have massively changed again a reunion and music industry changed even more. Now music is basically free, so artist compensation needs to come from somewhere.
|
|
|
Post by andymorris on Sept 5, 2024 12:42:05 GMT -5
Yeah, but in the end, people dont seem to care. They want to see the Gallaghers sing Wonderwall for them at any cost. Values are not "in" anymore. All that matters is the "now". Oasis used to have values. Its the biggest rock n roll swindle to be honest : Oasis standing ticket in 2009 was 40 Oasis standing ticket in 2024 is 150 Inflation since 2009 is 1,47 for 1 Oasis standing ticket should have been roughly 60 Reasonably, since its the comeback of the millenium, let's say 80 or even 90 including fee could have been acceptable. That's almost half of what people paid... before dynamic pricing. And they still would have earned many, many millions. Taking into account other gigs, they will make what 100, 150 millions each ? Do they really need that much money ? Is that needed to strum an acoustic guitar in a basement in a mansion ? Is Sarah McDonald's make up that expensive ? There is something a bit wrong here. They're gonna come on stage and sing that we need each other and other very heartful/universal messages like that. A bit ironic. as resurrection89 says its related to how much cost of music has changed I could be wrong as cant remember but am sure say in '94 cd's cost £15+ so if you use that inflation which is nearly 200% 30 years later a cd cost us £30 in todays money. Even the oasis singles were 3.99 so again £8 in todays money which is same price as an album now (IF you choose to buy) Fast forward to 09 and cd's were maybe £8 for standard edition and obv they were starting to try and claw money out of the music by releasing the special editions albums, boxsets pretty much standard vs ltd edition etc. You could look back at gigs in 94 and say they were £5 in 94 800% inflation is ridiculous at £40 but obv circumstances had changed massively, they were a huge band but also they were very rich by then but obv no one even blinked.. That same time has now passed again and circumstances have massively changed again a reunion and music industry changed even more. Now music is basically free, so artist compensation needs to come from somewhere. Comparing what can be compared eg level of fame and market value, its still overpriced. Maine Road was 17, Knebworth was around 23 pounds in 96, the 2009 prices already took into account piracy and decline in album sales. As you can see it was always gradual, those prices are just insane. And not justified. 94 prices at 5 pounds was before they were famous. Ticket prices have slowly but surely skyrocketed since livenation was created. Im not saying it should be 50 or 60. They are for the most of them, unjustified.
|
|
|
Post by jaq515 on Sept 5, 2024 12:59:00 GMT -5
as resurrection89 says its related to how much cost of music has changed I could be wrong as cant remember but am sure say in '94 cd's cost £15+ so if you use that inflation which is nearly 200% 30 years later a cd cost us £30 in todays money. Even the oasis singles were 3.99 so again £8 in todays money which is same price as an album now (IF you choose to buy) Fast forward to 09 and cd's were maybe £8 for standard edition and obv they were starting to try and claw money out of the music by releasing the special editions albums, boxsets pretty much standard vs ltd edition etc. You could look back at gigs in 94 and say they were £5 in 94 800% inflation is ridiculous at £40 but obv circumstances had changed massively, they were a huge band but also they were very rich by then but obv no one even blinked.. That same time has now passed again and circumstances have massively changed again a reunion and music industry changed even more. Now music is basically free, so artist compensation needs to come from somewhere. Comparing what can be compared eg level of fame and market value, its still overpriced. Maine Road was 17, Knebworth was around 23 pounds in 96, the 2009 prices already took into account piracy and decline in album sales. As you can see it was always gradual, those prices are just insane. And not justified. 94 prices at 5 pounds was before they were famous. Ticket prices have slowly but surely skyrocketed since livenation was created. Im not saying it should be 50 or 60. They are for the most of them, unjustified. that was my point about 09 they already started to increase gig prices to balance but they were still dealing with a lot of actual physical albums bought etc at the time where now, most of that revenue is effectively gone. in know £'s wise 17 to 23 not huge but it is a 35% increase in less than 4 months. obv was being stupid about the pre fame gig prices but point is the same as circumstances change so do prices and at moment they sat as one of most anticipated reunion tour uk seen and we are all paying that price. live nation guess is the culprit for some of the price increases of tickets but like said cds were £15+ and they cost pence to produce so was the record companies over charging then to make themselves rich now its live nation Nothing changed its just shifted from music to gigs (and btw I was suprised at the £150 ticket price I didnt expect that at all but I can see see why tbh)
|
|
|
Post by stardustez on Sept 5, 2024 13:21:02 GMT -5
From the link; Oasis fan John and his family all tried simultaneously to get tickets, but by mid-afternoon, after six hours in the online queue, John had given up, but his wife was eventually offered tickets - for £355 each. "I find that just disgraceful," he said. Oasis have "built their career on the connection they've got with ordinary folk", John said. "But when you've queued all day and the price of the ticket has more than doubled, I just think they've broken their contract with the working class. "They're pretty dead to me now." This is exactly how I feel right now.
|
|
|
Post by jaq515 on Sept 5, 2024 13:27:08 GMT -5
From the link; Oasis fan John and his family all tried simultaneously to get tickets, but by mid-afternoon, after six hours in the online queue, John had given up, but his wife was eventually offered tickets - for £355 each. "I find that just disgraceful," he said. Oasis have "built their career on the connection they've got with ordinary folk", John said. "But when you've queued all day and the price of the ticket has more than doubled, I just think they've broken their contract with the working class. "They're pretty dead to me now." This is exactly how I feel right now. Think every one is upset about this thus the thread but your response to it was to sell the tickets to fans on here 1500 tho?
|
|
|
Post by stardustez on Sept 5, 2024 13:59:32 GMT -5
From the link; Oasis fan John and his family all tried simultaneously to get tickets, but by mid-afternoon, after six hours in the online queue, John had given up, but his wife was eventually offered tickets - for £355 each. "I find that just disgraceful," he said. Oasis have "built their career on the connection they've got with ordinary folk", John said. "But when you've queued all day and the price of the ticket has more than doubled, I just think they've broken their contract with the working class. "They're pretty dead to me now." This is exactly how I feel right now. Think every one is upset about this thus the thread but your response to it was to sell the tickets to fans on here 1500 tho? It was obviously mocking him. If I get rid of them I will transfer it to my sister.
|
|
|
Post by carlober on Sept 5, 2024 14:39:21 GMT -5
From the link; Oasis fan John and his family all tried simultaneously to get tickets, but by mid-afternoon, after six hours in the online queue, John had given up, but his wife was eventually offered tickets - for £355 each. "I find that just disgraceful," he said. Oasis have "built their career on the connection they've got with ordinary folk", John said. "But when you've queued all day and the price of the ticket has more than doubled, I just think they've broken their contract with the working class. "They're pretty dead to me now." This is exactly how I feel right now. Overreacting much? The most important band of his life is "pretty dead" to him because of insane ticket prices inflated by a fucked-up algorithm? What about the music, the memories? Come on.
|
|
|
Post by Marissa on Sept 5, 2024 14:53:33 GMT -5
In my opinion:
This will blow over.
The Eras Tour used a ballot with even less of an effort to identify diehard fans - truly, truly random - and Ticketmaster crashed horrifically on everyone, and then tickets were scalped for thousands of dollars later and that was it. She added some more dates as it was needed and there were many people who still didn't get tickets.
But it didn't sour the entire damn tour. People got over it.
They will here too.
At least our band's team are trying to make it right. Only allowing face value resale. Offering priority to fans who missed out for the new dates.
I doubt they can just go back in and have TM refund fans the difference in the dynamic pricing easily like many are calling for. It's likely a breach of contract to do so. And for all we know they could still be exploring that option.
|
|
|
Post by themanwholivesinhell on Sept 5, 2024 17:04:15 GMT -5
I doubt they can just go back in and have TM refund fans the difference in the dynamic pricing easily like many are calling for. It's likely a breach of contract to do so. And for all we know they could still be exploring that option. Ye I strongly suspect the reason they haven’t yet is that it breaches their contract with Ticketmaster. I guess this TM investigation has the potential to change things. As if its proven Ticketmaster exploited fans, then they could end up being liable to pay those fans the difference back.
|
|
|
Post by jaq515 on Sept 5, 2024 17:13:43 GMT -5
I doubt they can just go back in and have TM refund fans the difference in the dynamic pricing easily like many are calling for. It's likely a breach of contract to do so. And for all we know they could still be exploring that option. Ye I strongly suspect the reason they haven’t yet is that it breaches their contract with Ticketmaster. I guess this TM investigation has the potential to change things. As if its proven Ticketmaster exploited fans, then they could end up being liable to pay those fans the difference back. I would say at the very least bands using dynamic will have to advertise all prices up front and give potential price brackets it could rise too. So standing 135-360 if this gig had been advertised with dynamic in mind (Potentially allow for longer time window for people who get the 360 price to decide if can afford it vs being pressured to purchase in the small time window you have) if the outcome is anything like that I cant see many bands using it as the high price of the dynamic window will just turn people off getting tickets and the dynamic might not even kick in
|
|
|
Post by andymorris on Sept 6, 2024 1:39:45 GMT -5
Of course it will blow over. People who paid the silly prices will get over it, the media will move on to the next scandal.
Scandals dont stick anymore. People get bored quickly.
No one will get refunded the difference coz it would set a precedent, and ticketmaster or greedy producers dont want that. They will probably quietly make a law about it, probably including a text on ticketmaster warning that prices will be higher if demand grows. That's it.
The good thing to do for Oasis would be to lower the prices for the next tour, if any.
|
|
|
Post by spaneli on Sept 6, 2024 1:59:43 GMT -5
Ye I strongly suspect the reason they haven’t yet is that it breaches their contract with Ticketmaster. I guess this TM investigation has the potential to change things. As if its proven Ticketmaster exploited fans, then they could end up being liable to pay those fans the difference back. I would say at the very least bands using dynamic will have to advertise all prices up front and give potential price brackets it could rise too. So standing 135-360 if this gig had been advertised with dynamic in mind (Potentially allow for longer time window for people who get the 360 price to decide if can afford it vs being pressured to purchase in the small time window you have) if the outcome is anything like that I cant see many bands using it as the high price of the dynamic window will just turn people off getting tickets and the dynamic might not even kick in You're never going to be able to give a range or estimate on dynamic pricing. That sorta flies against it being "dynamic." On that day tickets were going for $360. But on another day, with greater demand, they could have easily gone up to $1k. Edit: For instance, the demand for this tour was way bigger than even Oasis had suspected. So if they had put out an estimated bracket relative to the demand they were expecting before these tickets went on sale, that estimate and those brackets would've been wholly incorrect.
|
|
|
Post by darmin on Sept 6, 2024 2:34:13 GMT -5
as resurrection89 says its related to how much cost of music has changed I could be wrong as cant remember but am sure say in '94 cd's cost £15+ so if you use that inflation which is nearly 200% 30 years later a cd cost us £30 in todays money. Even the oasis singles were 3.99 so again £8 in todays money which is same price as an album now (IF you choose to buy) Fast forward to 09 and cd's were maybe £8 for standard edition and obv they were starting to try and claw money out of the music by releasing the special editions albums, boxsets pretty much standard vs ltd edition etc. You could look back at gigs in 94 and say they were £5 in 94 800% inflation is ridiculous at £40 but obv circumstances had changed massively, they were a huge band but also they were very rich by then but obv no one even blinked.. That same time has now passed again and circumstances have massively changed again a reunion and music industry changed even more. Now music is basically free, so artist compensation needs to come from somewhere. Comparing what can be compared eg level of fame and market value, its still overpriced. Maine Road was 17, Knebworth was around 23 pounds in 96, the 2009 prices already took into account piracy and decline in album sales.
As you can see it was always gradual, those prices are just insane. And not justified. 94 prices at 5 pounds was before they were famous. Ticket prices have slowly but surely skyrocketed since livenation was created. Im not saying it should be 50 or 60. They are for the most of them, unjustified. Are you kidding me? Since 2009 till our days the decline in sales was probably bigger or as big due to streaming
|
|
|
Post by jaq515 on Sept 6, 2024 2:53:06 GMT -5
I would say at the very least bands using dynamic will have to advertise all prices up front and give potential price brackets it could rise too. So standing 135-360 if this gig had been advertised with dynamic in mind (Potentially allow for longer time window for people who get the 360 price to decide if can afford it vs being pressured to purchase in the small time window you have) if the outcome is anything like that I cant see many bands using it as the high price of the dynamic window will just turn people off getting tickets and the dynamic might not even kick in You're never going to be able to give a range or estimate on dynamic pricing. That sorta flies against it being "dynamic." On that day tickets were going for $360. But on another day, with greater demand, they could have easily gone up to $1k. Edit: For instance, the demand for this tour was way bigger than even Oasis had suspected. So if they had put out an estimated bracket relative to the demand they were expecting before these tickets went on sale, that estimate and those brackets would've been wholly incorrect. Ok so they’ll have to advertise tickets the at 135-1000. The CMA do not care a second who you are if they think someone doing something they don’t like you have to change. (Obv the the ones who nearly stopped the 80 billion Microsoft / activison blizzard deal and Microsoft did jump through hoops for them). So Ticketmaster won’t stand a chance I think having a price cap is already one of the things the government was talking about for ticket reselling so could See the CMA (and to me is very obvious choice if this practice is going to happen) So back to original point CMA will defo want transparency for customers and say to have a cap. So all tickets who choose to have dynamic pricing will have to advertise 135-1000 for tickets which again will just scare off people even trying so bands won’t use it Think we at 2 different angles you accepting what’s happening now and I was coming from In the future if this practice continues what wil have to change
|
|