|
Post by space75gr on Feb 18, 2015 5:00:45 GMT -5
I will never understand, till the day I die, why they chose Bring The Light as the first single. That putrid mess is barely listenable... Simply makes no sense. We joke about such a suggestion here, yet Beady Eye and their management actually did something so unfathomable. (i believe that BTL is an excellent rock n roll song but) i know what you mean and you are right. and the worst thing is that Beady Eye made the same mistake twice, releasing SBOTA as the 1st single of BE. I suppose they wanted to show/prove they could write something different from the typical oasis sound and could gain a few more fans outside the world of oasis. The funny thing is that critics praised both songs (BTL,SBOTA) with excellent reviews about them, but fans were somehow divided. The result was Beady Eye to lose fans...oasis fans. WTF! Release "The Roller" or "Four Letter Word", release "Flick Of The Finger" and put the excitement in 10! at the end of the day, i m gonna use the wise words of "LetItBleed"... "at least "The Roller", "Four Letter Word","Flick Of The Finger" will always be the 1st singles...in our hearts!!!" cheers!
|
|
|
Post by tonethestone1 on Feb 18, 2015 10:38:37 GMT -5
1) Four Letter Word This should have been first song Beady Eye let out to the public. Gets played a lot at football grounds ive noticed, not that its a sign of it being good. Good song though, as good as it gets tbh. 5/10.
2) Millionaire Not bad at all, simple, but works. Liam vocal good on this one. 5/10.
3) The Roller Weirdly I remember some US publications raving about this song, not sure why, its nothing special at all, bland. 3/10.
4) Beatles and Stones Lyrics possibly worst ive ever heard, from ANYONE. Tune is ok, bland but not offensive. (2)
5) Wind Up Dream Terrible. Even worse than I remember. (1)
6) Bring the Light Bizarre choice for opening Beady Eye with. Don't think its the disaster some make out, but its not a good song either. (3)
7) For Anyone Im a sucker for this one, quite like it, Songbird-esque. (4)
8) Kill for a Dream Lazy. Pure lazy writing. This wouldn't have made a b-side in Oasis lowest days. (1)
9) Standing On the Edge of the Noise Awful (1)
10) Wigwam Always liked this one, not sure why though, its very repetitive, not sure there was any need to do it, not as good as I remember. (3)
11) Three Ring Circus Verse crap. Chorus simple but does a job. (4)
12) The Beat Goes On Awful. First listen thought it had potential, turns out its a bigger flop than Falcao at United. (2)
13) The Morning Son Don't mind this one, its ok, nothing I would probably put on myself though, but not bad. (4)
|
|
|
Post by space75gr on Feb 18, 2015 12:30:46 GMT -5
1) Four Letter Word This should have been first song Beady Eye let out to the public. Gets played a lot at football grounds ive noticed, not that its a sign of it being good. Good song though, as good as it gets tbh. 5/10. 2) Millionaire Not bad at all, simple, but works. Liam vocal good on this one. 5/10. 3) The Roller Weirdly I remember some US publications raving about this song, not sure why, its nothing special at all, bland. 3/10. 4) Beatles and Stones Lyrics possibly worst ive ever heard, from ANYONE. Tune is ok, bland but not offensive. (2) 5) Wind Up Dream Terrible. Even worse than I remember. (1) 6) Bring the Light Bizarre choice for opening Beady Eye with. Don't think its the disaster some make out, but its not a good song either. (3) 7) For Anyone Im a sucker for this one, quite like it, Songbird-esque. (4) 8) Kill for a Dream Lazy. Pure lazy writing. This wouldn't have made a b-side in Oasis lowest days. (1) 9) Standing On the Edge of the Noise Awful (1) 10) Wigwam Always liked this one, not sure why though, its very repetitive, not sure there was any need to do it, not as good as I remember. (3) 11) Three Ring Circus Verse crap. Chorus simple but does a job. (4) 12) The Beat Goes On Awful. First listen thought it had potential, turns out its a bigger flop than Falcao at United. (2) 13) The Morning Son Don't mind this one, its ok, nothing I would probably put on myself though, but not bad. (4)
|
|
|
Post by allingoodtime on Feb 18, 2015 14:37:57 GMT -5
A good album imo, very good but you need to be a fan of 'vintage' style rock to enjoy it
|
|
|
Post by joladella on Feb 18, 2015 15:04:59 GMT -5
A good album imo, very good but you need to be a fan of 'vintage' style rock to enjoy it And/or the singer's voice/singing! Even though I prefer the way it sounds on BE. But still ...
|
|
|
Post by saruzzu on Feb 18, 2015 16:49:57 GMT -5
after 4 years
1) Four Letter Word 7/10 2) Millionaire 6/10 3) The Roller 6.5/10 4) Beatles and Stones 4/10 5) Wind Up Dream 3.5/10 6) Bring the Light 4.5/10 7) For Anyone 4/10 8) Kill for a Dream 5.5/10 9) Standing On the Edge of the Noise 5/10 10) Wigwam 6/10 11) Three Ring Circus 5/10 12) The Beat Goes On 7/10 13) The Morning Son 5.5/10
|
|
|
Post by allingoodtime on Feb 18, 2015 16:56:00 GMT -5
The four letter word: 8/10 Millionaire: 6.5/10 The Roller: 8.5/10 Beatles and stones: 6/10 Wind up dream: 5/10 Bring the light 5/10 Three ring circus: 6/10 The beat goes on 6.5/10 The morning son: 8.5/10
only rated the ones i listen to
|
|
|
Post by World71R on Feb 18, 2015 19:04:49 GMT -5
Top Tracks for Me:
1. The Roller 9/10 2. Four Letter Word (solo is fantastic) 8.5/10 3. The Morning Son 8/10 4. Millionaire 8/10 5. Bring the Light 7/10
|
|
|
Post by frjdoasis on Feb 18, 2015 20:30:48 GMT -5
I can't the get all the hate for BTL. It is a top boogie woogie song, groovy as fuck. It would have become a classic had it been released in the 50s.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2015 20:37:26 GMT -5
I can't the get all the hate for BTL. It is a top boogie woogie song, groovy as fuck. It would have become a classic had it been released in the 50s. right. only problem is, it was released in 2011. seriously, when i first heard 'bring the light' i thought it was a joke. no, i mean i really thought liam was doing it to fool everyone, and also to bring attention to the band... and then would release 'the real first single' later on that day, or the next.
|
|
|
Post by frjdoasis on Feb 18, 2015 20:41:04 GMT -5
Yes it was probably a bad choice for a single, but I was talking about the song rather than the opportunity to release it as a single. In that respect, I don't care for 'what's going on at the minute in music' when judging a tune.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2015 20:43:43 GMT -5
In that respect, I don't care for 'what's going on at the minute in music' when judging a tune. neither do i. unfortunately, aside from the fanbase here, we are probably in the minority.
|
|
|
Post by Jim G. on Feb 18, 2015 20:46:35 GMT -5
still the worst gallagher related output. never listen to that. bad songs (just a few decent) and worse production.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 18, 2015 20:50:02 GMT -5
Speaking of the production, I wonder how it would have sounded if the infamous Dave Sardy had got his greasy mitts on these recordings.
|
|
|
Post by spaneli on Feb 18, 2015 21:33:49 GMT -5
DGSS is still just negligibly average. There are some flashes and highlights, but I can't call any album "excellent" when it has duds like Millionaire, Beatles and Stones (seriously, who thought up that title?), Wind Up Dream, Three Ring Circus, The Beat Goes On, and Standing on the Edge of the Noise (literally, the worst Gallagher related song ever. The worst. That's note even hyperbole.). There are too many explanations that have to be thrown it's way, too many songs that only show flashes, too many poor lyrics, and lazy instrumentation. That's not what I think of when I hear an "excellent" album. What exactly on DGSS is excellent with the exception of Liam's voice? Excellent would say you hit something out of the ballpark. The Roller is a good song, but excellent? The Morning Son is a good song, but excellent? How is Bring the Light being called excellent? It's MUCH better than people give it credit for, but excellent? Four Letter Word probably gets the closest to that distinction. The rest is barely scrapping average.
There's a reason Beady Eye lost over a half to a third of their fanbase in a matter of a year and it wasn't completely down to a choice of single. Some of it had to do with the quality of the album. When your most ardent fans give-up then what does that tell you about the quality of an album? If DGSS was excellent then I don't want to know what that makes BE? The best album ever? No, I'll reserve excellent for something that deserves it, not DGSS.
It's still one of the few albums, next to HC, that no matter how many times I listen to, no matter the mood, or the day, it doesn't get better. In fact, it gets worse. It becomes too much to excuse what's on there. I wish it hadn't been made. I wish they had spent more time writing instead of trying to prove something. Think if they had taken the best bits of DGSS and BE? But you know what? When it takes two albums worth of material to make a decent to good album it says a lot about the material available and the band. It says they're average at best.
|
|
|
Post by World71R on Feb 18, 2015 22:02:50 GMT -5
It becomes too much to excuse what's on there. I wish it hadn't been made. I wish they had spent more time writing instead of trying to prove something. Think if they had taken the best bits of DGSS and BE? But you know what? When it takes two albums worth of material to make a decent to good album it says a lot about the material available and the band. It says they're average at best. I agree with this part the most. The problem Beady Eye had was that they came out of the gates completely retro with recycled material and nothing to hide it whatsoever. The Beat Goes On is a prime example of it. It's just way too much of a retro-sounding song, far too derivative, and is rather underwhelming, with nothing to build it up. Nothing with Andy Bell "trying" to write an Oasis-esque song, it's just that it's too average, like you said.
|
|
|
Post by leak4ever on Feb 18, 2015 22:28:09 GMT -5
I will never understand, till the day I die, why they chose Bring The Light as the first single. That putrid mess is barely listenable... Simply makes no sense. We joke about such a suggestion here, yet Beady Eye and their management actually did something so unfathomable. (i believe that BTL is an excellent rock n roll song but) i know what you mean and you are right. and the worst thing is that Beady Eye made the same mistake twice, releasing SBOTA as the 1st single of BE. I suppose they wanted to show/prove they could write something different from the typical oasis sound and could gain a few more fans outside the world of oasis. The funny thing is that critics praised both songs (BTL,SBOTA) with excellent reviews about them, but fans were somehow divided. The result was Beady Eye to lose fans...oasis fans. WTF! Release "The Roller" or "Four Letter Word", release "Flick Of The Finger" and put the excitement in 10! at the end of the day, i m gonna use the wise words of "LetItBleed"... "at least "The Roller", "Four Letter Word","Flick Of The Finger" will always be the 1st singles...in our hearts!!!" cheers! The problem with Bring The Light, crapness aside, is that it didn't appeal to anyone. Not the general public nor his loyal fans. I'm an Oasis fan but the song didn't appeal to me at all. And it wasn't the type of song that would appeal to the masses either. So who's gonna buy it? As you said, there were much better songs on DGSS and yet they chose a stupid Jerry Lee Lewis rip off. With decisions like that, are we surprised that Beady Eye became a joke of a band?
|
|
|
Post by leak4ever on Feb 18, 2015 22:39:11 GMT -5
Kill For A Dream must have one of the stupidest guitar solos in rock history. They're professional musicians and that's the best they could do? I could come up with something better in a few seconds and I'm not even good at guitar!
|
|
|
Post by The Crimson Rambler on Feb 18, 2015 22:44:55 GMT -5
I will never understand, till the day I die, why they chose Bring The Light as the first single. That putrid mess is barely listenable. It's the equivalent of releasing Little James as the lead single to Giants. Simply makes no sense. We joke about such a suggestion here, yet Beady Eye and their management actually did something so unfathomable. ' Bring The Light' seems to be one of these love/hate songs not unlike equally polarising songs ' Force of Nature' and ' She Is Love'. These songs are so boneheaded and catchy (at least compared to other songs on their respective albums), that I struggle to see why so many seem to be detest them. These are Liam and Noel songs, you can't expect every song to be ' Champagne Supernova' and not expect a ' Digsy's Dinner' or ' She's Electric' thrown in. I personally though that either ' Bring the Light' or ' The Roller' were the perfect choice for lead single. Not because they're amazing or single worthy in the context of Oasis but simply because the rest of the album is so average. For me, these 2 songs were easily the brightest spots of the album with maybe ' Four Letter Word' being the only other song doing much for me. I really don't get all this, "oh, if only this single came out first" talk. At the end of the day if the songs were there, there'd of been more fans regardless. A poor album followed by much better one.
|
|
|
Post by leak4ever on Feb 18, 2015 23:12:07 GMT -5
I will never understand, till the day I die, why they chose Bring The Light as the first single. That putrid mess is barely listenable. It's the equivalent of releasing Little James as the lead single to Giants. Simply makes no sense. We joke about such a suggestion here, yet Beady Eye and their management actually did something so unfathomable. ' Bring The Light' seems to be one of these love/hate songs not unlike equally polarising songs ' Force of Nature' and ' She Is Love'. These songs are so boneheaded and catchy (at least compared to other songs on their respective albums), that I struggle to see why so many seem to be detest them. These are Liam and Noel songs, you can't expect every song to be ' Champagne Supernova' and not expect a ' Digsy's Dinner' or ' She's Electric' thrown in. I personally though that either ' Bring the Light' or ' The Roller' were the perfect choice for lead single. Not because they're amazing or single worthy in the context of Oasis but simply because the rest of the album is so average. For me, these 2 songs were easily the brightest spots of the album with maybe ' Four Letter Word' being the only other song doing much for me. I really don't get all this, "oh, if only this single came out first" talk. At the end of the day if the songs were there, there'd of been more fans regardless. A poor album followed by much better one. Being polarising can be a good thing IF the people who support it actually love it. If the song polarises opinion but the support for it is not enough, then the hatred for it will prevail and it goes down as a failure. The best example I can give you is with BABYMETAL. They are absolutely hated with extreme vitriol by many and in most circumstances, they wouldn't survive. However, those who support them love them to such an extent that they can pretty much sell out venues wherever they go, anywhere in the world, despite only having one album out and singing in Japanese. My point is, it's no good being middle of the road and safe unless it's going to appeal to the masses. Bring The Light didn't appeal to the masses nor was it polarising in a good way.
|
|
|
Post by Manualex on Feb 18, 2015 23:34:58 GMT -5
Havent heard this one in full for the past... 4 years. I guess it's time to revist it for one more review
1) The intro of 4LW is amazing, from the get go no BS. My only issue with the song is the Nothing Ever Last FOrevah before the first solo, everything else is Beady Eye at it's finest... OMG that's the 4lw NELF
2) Millionaire is a lovely acoustic song... Until Liam starts singing about being loved like a lover and sounds already tired/nasally in the album
3) The Roller is nice, but I cant recall any lyrics before I hear the song, the great solo played by Gem is one of the best of the album
4) Let's not mention the name of this atrocity, the less said about this the better. It keeps the momentum of the record and it beats me MAMAAAAAH. I will get out of the way as soon it's over Liam.
5) Wind Up Dream, I think the chorus says it all about this album
"It's just a wind up dream So don't wake me up 'Cause I like what I see With my eyes shut"
Nice harmonica solo, but the final seconds are annoying
6) It's sextacy! should have been a minute(or two?) shorter than it is, fun track BUT FFS this isn't the first thing you show to the world after OASIS you give a preview of a guitar from a song that isn't on this album and then you deliver this and ask to be taken seriously? I dont get it, and I'll never will
Baby come on! Baby Fuck off
Sometimes you dont want to show all the tune in the studio version and I really think this should have been a B-side at best/forgotten album track at it's worst
7)For Anyone 2 Minutes that repeats the same thing over and over again, I honestly didn't tought it was possible to be repetitive in this short amount of time. Another verse(with other lyrics) could've helped the fate of this one. In-out of my mind
8) The lowlight of the album, is this song about Liam throwing a plum/breaking someone's guitar and not wanting to face the consecuences of it? Because it feels that way. The melodies are great but the lyrics are atrocious. A higher bpm would help, this is the Little James(a minute of Nananananana... batman for fun, 20 seconds and a fade out would've worked better) of the album and it wasn't written by Liam! but rather Andy.
9) STOTEN Yes Liam/Andy/Gem we were rolling in anticipation for your album, but this isn't worth it. Get back to where you all belong. Great bootleg title, but atrocious song.(contender for lowlight of album as well).
10) Wigwam is a great song, why is it burried after all that's before?(something I'll further discuss later) Sha-lalala's are rather lovely. The echo on liam voice before the I'm coming up is annoying. Chris is starting one of the best moments right now, but it shouldn't take more than a minute to do it. Yes, Liam Im hearing you coming. The best track from drumming part. The sha-lalalalas are not good in the outro. A minute or two less could help with the long time this record has been going.
11) The three ring circus going raaaaawnddddd The sound you're asking for is something post 60's so you wont like it. I wonder if they actually used all the songs that were rejected in Oasis or did they also written songs for this one? Because the B-sides were miles better on this album
12) Beat goes on, if this is the song that the angels will sing to me I would rather go to hell. It tries to be anthem but feels anemic, like something is missing. And if your heart isnt beating you're dead Liam. And for me is the end of the day(11:55 pm for me as I write this)
13) And we get to The morning son
You'll never know, unless you try, you're blinding by what you idleise. I stand alone, nobody knows the morning. the sun is roll he in my light He's in my sole he's even in my rock and roll
Are these the lyrics? because if it isn't someone fucked up on their youtube channel. The less said about the echo on Liams voce the better. The Keyboards finally work after god knows how long. Chris kills it in this one.
And after a frenzy outro we are done. It's not that bad, but not that good, too many songs that are just there, dont hit you, but when they do it usually not for the better.
|
|
|
Post by Manualex on Feb 18, 2015 23:47:42 GMT -5
Is my hate deserved? Probably not, but you cant go out and say that you have done the best album since DM and then deliver this. I would loved to see them win and when they putted out BE they did moved onwards but the world wouldnt listen, shame because that was the start of something great.
|
|
|
Post by The Invisible Sun on Feb 19, 2015 0:10:25 GMT -5
I think I'm the only one that appreciates Kill For A Dream. It has a great opening line (I consider it their best line of all their songs), and I think a good melody, just not a very good chorus. The solo is pretty basic, but I still think it's catchy. Most of the other lyrics are shit, but does Beady Eye really have many good lyrical moments in general? Of course not.
Let's be honest here, none of us listen to Beady Eye for their prophetic, insightful lyrics. We listen for that occasional spark of melodic genius. It doesn't happen very often and it's usually only very brief, but when it does happen, it makes it worth listening to.
4 years later, I think it's a pretty shit album in comparison to what they were capable of. BE blows it out of the water. Better songs and more consistency. But DGSS does have its shining moments.
Highlights:
The Morning Son Wigwam Millionaire The Roller
The rest of the songs are average (Four Letter Word) to plain bad (Standing On The Edge Of The Noise). Some more good ones, but none that really stand out. Even Kill For A Dream, which as I mentioned I really love, plods on.
Something else that makes this album nearly unlistenable, is the graininess. I swore my files were bad, it just didn't sound right and when the album arrived in the mail, I was saddened to see it wasn't the file quality, but the songs themselves.
I understand they were going for that 60's sound, but it's just dreadful and is one of the contributing factors which make this album so bland. It's why so many of these songs perform better live, because the mastering that was done is just awful. If you've ever bothered to put it in audacity or a similar program and look at the wavelengths, the highs and lows...it's a wall of sound, a large blob of solid color...It's ridiculous. They should have worked on it some more. Brought in another producer that knew what they were doing. Who finished this album after Lillywhite fled? Wasn't it Andy? My advice to him would be to stay away from production.
|
|
|
Post by NYR on Feb 19, 2015 12:17:15 GMT -5
I agree with most of what you wrote. The album was mediocre. It had some moments and a lot of disappointments. (I think The Morning Son was a highlight, so I'll have to disagree with you there.) That said, if Liam and co. had listened to Steve Lillywhite, they could have made a truly solid record. He's one of the best producers of the last 30 years, and he knows what he's doing. Instead, they ignored everything he threw at them; every idea he proposed, and every criticism he had for the songs. He could have made some of the bad songs somewhat passable, the passable songs good, and the good songs great. They were arrogant fools. The way Lillywhite was treated made rounds around the industry. That's why every person they asked to produce their second album passed. (Not putting down Dave Sitek's work, but do you know how far down the line you have to go to get to him? He was literally the ONLY person who would work with them. He did a great job, too, even though the songs were awful.) I'm also interested what the source is for this? Who turned them down? I struggle to believe that he was the ONLY producer in the world of music who would work with them even if they are difficult. Not finding producers willing to work with them was mentioned in the "Start Anew" documentary that can be found on YouTube. To answer Marcos and jupi... Not to bring up old feuds (which, by the way, was certainly not my intention), Liam and co. effectively threw Lillywhite under the bus in an interview with Shortlist. They said about DGSS, “the producer weren’t right, he bailed, Gem ended up mixing it and it turned out great for what it was. But we needed a great producer.” Lillywhite responded on his Twitter account, where a lot of the blanks could be filled from his criticisms—mainly that the songs from DGSS were throwaways from the Oasis years and that he was glad Sitek was helping them write songs for BE. That says a lot, actually. It says that they basically made Lillywhite a glorified engineer, and not a producer. Anyone familiar with the process of making an album knows that the producers work with the artist to take the songs, clean them up and make them better. His saying that he was glad that Sitek was helping them write songs for BE infers that he had nothing to do with bettering the songs—they were recorded as they were first introduced to him. (In other words, "We're recording these songs. They're good as is. We're paying you to record, so record them. We're not hearing any of what you have to say about it.") Lillywhite is a pro, which is why he kept most the details of what happened behind closed doors. However, he said "Things were said," and Lillywhite left during the mixing phase. He wouldn't have said any of that had Beady Eye slagged him off publicly when promoting BE... because they needed to blame someone other than themselves for DGSS' poor chart performance and mixed critical reception. edit: Since my last post got more attention than intended (it was pretty throwaway), I should say that I pieced things together. I may not have gotten the exact details exactly right, but am pretty sure what I said was more or less what happened.
|
|
|
Post by matt on Feb 19, 2015 14:42:22 GMT -5
I'm also interested what the source is for this? Who turned them down? I struggle to believe that he was the ONLY producer in the world of music who would work with them even if they are difficult. Not finding producers willing to work with them was mentioned in the "Start Anew" documentary that can be found on YouTube. To answer Marcos and jupi... Not to bring up old feuds (which, by the way, was certainly not my intention), Liam and co. effectively threw Lillywhite under the bus in an interview with Shortlist. They said about DGSS, “the producer weren’t right, he bailed, Gem ended up mixing it and it turned out great for what it was. But we needed a great producer.” Lillywhite responded on his Twitter account, where a lot of the blanks could be filled from his criticisms—mainly that the songs from DGSS were throwaways from the Oasis years and that he was glad Sitek was helping them write songs for BE. That says a lot, actually. It says that they basically made Lillywhite a glorified engineer, and not a producer. Anyone familiar with the process of making an album knows that the producers work with the artist to take the songs, clean them up and make them better. His saying that he was glad that Sitek was helping them write songs for BE infers that he had nothing to do with bettering the songs—they were recorded as they were first introduced to him. (In other words, "We're recording these songs. They're good as is. We're paying you to record, so record them. We're not hearing any of what you have to say about it.") Lillywhite is a pro, which is why he kept most the details of what happened behind closed doors. However, he said "Things were said," and Lillywhite left during the mixing phase. He wouldn't have said any of that had Beady Eye slagged him off publicly when promoting BE... because they needed to blame someone other than themselves for DGSS' poor chart performance and mixed critical reception. edit: Although my last post got some of your attention, it was pretty throwaway, so I should say that I pieced things together. I may not have gotten the exact details exactly right, but am pretty sure what I said was more or less what happened. The only reason why Lillywhite bailed is probably he knew he was trying to polish a turd. I just looked at that track listing, and there are some songs I completely forgot about and all I can say is, wow, what a steaming pile of clusterfuck they are. The only tunes I like on it are Four Letter Word, For Anyone, Wigwam and The Morning Son. The rest is just a crime to humanity. What's even worse is their cowardly manner in the way they castigated Steve Lillywhite (a good guy who rightly praised Flick of the Finger so a man not to have a grudge) - either they are deluded bordering on genuine insanity to think they could have got a good album out of those or they are cowardly to admit they themselves were to blame for the albums failure.
|
|