|
Post by oasisfanboy on Mar 11, 2011 0:00:04 GMT -5
It's not about classics, it's about none of BDI's tunes being better than those: The Hindu Times SCYHO LBL Shout It Out Loud Lyla POTQ TIOBI Bag It Up The Turning Waiting Fot The Rapture TSOTL FD Who Put The Weight.. Maybe they aren't classics but they piss over anything in DGSS Christ, it's funny how an album can really divide opinion. Good I suppose, tho. I mean, Shout It Out Loud not better than The Beat Goes On? That's stretching your point a little far, surely?!
|
|
|
Post by daysoasis on Mar 11, 2011 0:24:11 GMT -5
Clean your ears people, a number of bdi songs are just as good(and maybe even better!!!) as oasis songs of the last 10 years!!. And this album assured that they are very capable sans Noel G!!.
|
|
|
Post by shoofee on Mar 11, 2011 0:25:13 GMT -5
^ BOTH have spoken highly of one another. For me, one can dream, can't he?! A few years ago at some festival, I forget which. I believe the Foos were performing and Noel was just there as a guest to watch or both were on the bill (again dont remember). Dave had a sign on his trailer that said something to the effect of "Only Noel Gallagher is allowed in". The respect is mutual. I dont want to see Noel go down the road of doing collaborations with other highly intense artists as Dave is, as it rarely works. Lennon/McCartney is a different breed since they basically grew up musically together. Im not much on the Foos, but Dave is awesome. That said, this is a decent thread. I also think its extremely early. The album hasnt even been officially out two weeks yet despite a lot of us having heard it in its entirety for longer, to call anything or discount something a "classic" needs time to gestate. Beady Eye is not awful. However, at least on record, its nothing special. Lyrically its got the depth of a puddle and its musically derivative, even moreso than Oasis ever was. We can talk and talk about Noel's regression as years went on, but the man could still write absolutely spectacular songs. He, moreso than anyone else in Oasis, was clearly moving in other directions musically. The later half of Oasis shows this, as the songs Noel was singing tended to be more experimental. I remember hearing Falling Down for the first time (and that is a fucking great song) and being stunned by how different it was. Liam is more of the bread and butter, turn it up to 11, type of writer. He isn't much for nuance. Noel has learned to embrace nuance and take steps in other directions in almost every respect, whether it works or not is another story. HC is the only blight on Noel at this point. There is very little on that album that is worth anything. Even the supposed good songs, like THT and SCYHO do not stand up, at least for me. I also think that Noel's single worst song came on DBTT (Let There Be Love). Let There Be Love is proof that some things just shouldnt be changed as Its a Crime is a very listenable tune in comparison. I think its far to early to say anything definitive about Beady Eye. This debut is okay for what it is, but it's also lacking a lot in comparison to Oasis. There just doesn't seem to be much meaning behind half the songs on this record. It feels like a JET record almost, but its easily the best JET record ever made. Im far more excited for what Noel brings to the table with his eventual solo debut. His songs (written and sung) on the last two Oasis albums were leagues above any of the other's contributions (with To Be Where Theres Life the one exception). I also believe that the only Liam sung/Noel written tune on the last two that stands up to Noel's sung songs was The Turning, which Liam couldnt get right outside of the studio.
|
|
|
Post by gdforever on Mar 11, 2011 1:37:19 GMT -5
Speaking of Dave Grohl and Noel... Funny picture of the two of them hanging out together a week and a bit ago @ a Foo gig. lol. Along with Pink and Juliette Lewis yfrog.com/h3fzleaj
|
|
|
Post by theultimatewannabe on Mar 11, 2011 9:30:25 GMT -5
The BDI vs Oasis thing is seriously wearing down and I think people could try to avoid talking about it before they are quite confident with their opinions.
For now, the songs are growing steadily in me right now (especially Millionaire) and in a few months may exceed BHN in my list of favorite Oasis albums. I usually don't care about those "single materials "; they are good listens but don't really decide whether an album will be a classic or a disaster.
|
|
|
Post by start at the end on Mar 11, 2011 10:11:41 GMT -5
^ essentially telling people what they "should" and shouldn't talk about?
what a fuckin joke some of you people are.
I and the vast majority are pretty fuckin certain after two weeks, thanks though.
|
|
|
Post by theultimatewannabe on Mar 11, 2011 10:33:01 GMT -5
^ essentially telling people what they "should" and shouldn't talk about? what a fuckin joke some of you people are. I and the vast majority are pretty fuckin certain after two weeks, thanks though. I don't see any hints of "should" there, wrongo! Did my best there to be rhetorical and respectful of other's opinions, apparently you missed that. Certainty involves standing the test of time. A large part of people here STILL fight like a bunch of kids, and though calming down may not be the only solution, it's without doubt one of the best ones. The live tour has just started, no way a fan can start to see matters really objectively.
|
|
|
Post by start at the end on Mar 11, 2011 11:28:20 GMT -5
^ yeah. sure. I missed it. No hints in the aformentioned for certain.
you just did again too with the "live tour has just started no way a fan can start to see matters objectively" bullshit.
for fucks sake, according to whom?
YOU?
The thread is about the fucking ALBUM and its relation/standing next to Oasis material. Why don't take this shit on down the road and find another venue where you DON'T imply or directly state how and what others should think.
|
|
|
Post by shoes222 on Mar 11, 2011 14:02:59 GMT -5
Clean your ears people, a number of bdi songs are just as good(and maybe even better!!!) as oasis songs of the last 10 years!!. And this album assured that they are very capable sans Noel G!!. From a songwriting standpoint they really aren't. That's a widely accepted opinion.
|
|
|
Post by tomlivesforever on Mar 11, 2011 16:54:45 GMT -5
Yeah because The Beat Goes on isn't better than Probably All In The Mind. ffs
Widely accepted by who? Noelites like yourself?
|
|
|
Post by supersonic8587 on Mar 11, 2011 17:12:37 GMT -5
Clean your ears people, a number of bdi songs are just as good(and maybe even better!!!) as oasis songs of the last 10 years!!. And this album assured that they are very capable sans Noel G!!. From a songwriting standpoint they really aren't. That's a widely accepted opinion. If a song is good, if it's not it's not. If a song is poorly written it will make for a shit song. If it's well written it will make for a good song. You can't have shit songwriting and amazing songs.
|
|
|
Post by daysoasis on Mar 11, 2011 17:18:14 GMT -5
We all had a pre knowledge that coming in, BDI would be less lyrically stronger!!!.But the songs turned out fine !!....i just have a feeling they'll do things that oasis never touched upon!!!
|
|
|
Post by discworld on Mar 11, 2011 17:23:49 GMT -5
Yeah because The Beat Goes on isn't better than Probably All In The Mind. ffs Widely accepted by who? Noelites like yourself? I prefer Probably All in The Mind I fall asleep at each listen of The Beat Goes On Any Noel's version of Probably All In The Mind ?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 11, 2011 18:45:02 GMT -5
There's nothing wrong with (Probably) All In The Mind. It's not their strongest tune, but it has a nice melody.
|
|
|
Post by tomlivesforever on Mar 11, 2011 18:55:21 GMT -5
I didn't say it was awful, I was just saying there are songs DGSS which are better than Noel's over the las 10 years. I have no doubt of that.
|
|
|
Post by theultimatewannabe on Mar 11, 2011 21:15:34 GMT -5
^ yeah. sure. I missed it. No hints in the aformentioned for certain. you just did again too with the "live tour has just started no way a fan can start to see matters objectively" bullshit. for fucks sake, according to whom? YOU? The thread is about the fucking ALBUM and its relation/standing next to Oasis material. Why don't take this shit on down the road and find another venue where you DON'T imply or directly state how and what others should think. That was a mere suggestion! I couldn't care less if people ignore me completely and keep talking about stuff like "rate the album!" or "Liam's vocal is the greatest!", I understand that this is a highly emotional fan forum and was cautiously giving a humble opinion without any intentions of persuading anybody. Now I'm confused if I am actually allowed to say anything here. Sorry for unintentionally disregarding the "fact" that suggestion was a serious sin
|
|
|
Post by definitivt on Mar 12, 2011 8:57:00 GMT -5
DGSS holds 65 on metacritic. DBTT holds 64 and DOYS 66. This doesn't necessarily mean anything, but my point is that only idiots says that it's worse than the later Oasis albums like it's a fact.
|
|
|
Post by shoes222 on Mar 12, 2011 15:57:01 GMT -5
I didn't say it was awful, I was just saying there are songs DGSS which are better than Noel's over the las 10 years. I have no doubt of that. Well sure, but Noel wrote a ton of songs for Oasis over the last 10 years. So if you're comparing the worst of those songs to one of the best on DGSS then fine, the DGSS song might be better, but the average Noel song is far more complete and musically and lyrically interesting than the average Beady Eye song. I shouldn't have to argue this point.
|
|
|
Post by Officer Jim Kurring on Mar 12, 2011 16:37:32 GMT -5
I shouldn't have to argue this point. you're right. we should have certain guidelines to stop needless arguing. one of those points should be.....Noel's songwriting has slowed down but he can still write great songs. winning!
|
|
|
Post by start at the end on Mar 14, 2011 10:05:45 GMT -5
DGSS holds 65 on metacritic. DBTT holds 64 and DOYS 66. This doesn't necessarily mean anything, but my point is that only idiots says that it's worse than the later Oasis albums like it's a fact. metacritic is a great clearinghouse for major releases but less so for albums like DGSS. Sad to say, but there's a bunch of poor reviews from pretty credible sources I have on my make-shift "review thread" that are not on MC. Honestly, I'd say the 30 or so reviews I've read of it would prolly land it more closely between 55-60- where is right about where I think it should fall. 3 stars out of 5. Id say 35% have been poor, 40% have been ok, and 25% have been good/excellent.
|
|