tadas
Oasis Roadie
???
Posts: 428
|
Post by tadas on Aug 5, 2008 19:47:03 GMT -5
i personaly like lorddontnoelmenow. whether hes making shit up or not. he'll never give up, same as Notorious L.4.E. everyone is taking this shit too serious. lets just wait for the album peace love and bananas
|
|
|
Post by wrinklyrocker on Aug 5, 2008 19:57:48 GMT -5
mate i think youre behind in the times, tadas. he were proved to be a liar when the NME informed us that his "who sings what" revelations were absolute bollocks.
but like him all you want.
p.s. did you read that shite review clearly??
|
|
tadas
Oasis Roadie
???
Posts: 428
|
Post by tadas on Aug 5, 2008 20:04:54 GMT -5
i read everything and i couldnt care less what everyone say until i hear the album my self
|
|
|
Post by wrinklyrocker on Aug 5, 2008 20:16:45 GMT -5
fancy this discussion happening in the PLAY PEN....
|
|
|
Post by The Boy Without the Blues on Aug 5, 2008 22:00:19 GMT -5
What we really need is webby to straighten this out. if webby comes on and says that im wrong about andy writing "waiting for the rapture" or about the songs that noel sings then i will never post here again. but he wont because i know im 100% right NME just told that Waiting For Rapture is Noel's and he sings it... also, Liam sings The Turning.... Care to keep your word?
|
|
|
Post by nyr401994 on Aug 5, 2008 22:49:01 GMT -5
i haven't seen writing on this level since the fourth grade.
|
|
|
Post by Moorish on Aug 6, 2008 3:54:49 GMT -5
I wrote this last year - Sophomore in College - this is how you write (got a 96% on this paper, too ) - Best thing I've ever written, too. It's damn good! You're telling me a college student can write much better than someone who has their degree already and is working as a journalist at a music magazine company? Get lost. Last part of intro:While there was mass support for the United States’ involvement, and while the initial motives were genuine and benevolent in nature, the war was wrought with severe mistakes and miscalculations which ultimately rendered the conflict unwinnable. By the time Richard Nixon entered the White House in 1969, the frustrated and war-weary public demanded an end to this already decade long conflict. Nixon did achieve peace by withdrawing all military forces from Vietnam, but this did not occur until 1975, thus yielding six years of yet more critical mistakes and struggles. Thesis:While the media did indeed negatively impact Nixon’s effort in the conflict and its aftermath, the fact that he used contradictory rhetoric, made tactical military blunders, and shifted the motives from a world-inclusive fight against communism to a self-interested need of preserving credibility, all depict that Nixon had only himself to blame for not achieving “peace with honor” in the Vietnam War. Well crafted segment from argument 1:In 1969, the American public voted in a Republican for the presidency hoping for change and improvement, fed up with the incompetence of the Democrats who created the disarray in the first place. However, Nixon proved to be no different than his liberal counterparts, and perhaps was worse due to the contradictory nature of his policies. Conclusion:Due to this type of media coverage, it is almost certain that some of Nixon’s actions were negated by the coverage. However, Nixon made far too many mistakes of his own in order for the media to be blamed in any significant way for his blunders or in inability of achieving peace with honor. If Nixon was more confident in his policies, and if he transposed that confidence onto the battlefield while keeping the initial motives and focus of the war in tact perhaps not only would he have achieved peace with honor, but may have also achieved victory. However, the complete opposite occurred. Only Nixon is to blame, not some guy in a suit and tie standing in front of a camera. Okay, you made you point before, no need to copy and paste in some extract from an essay you wrote! It's the other guy who's acting like he 11 years old, let's not all try and top him. Leave the wanking to LDNMN!
|
|