|
|
Post by tomlivesforever on Aug 5, 2008 11:57:16 GMT -5
You, or your "friend" suck at writing: As I sat down to hear the new album by Oasis I can honestly say that I did not expect much. The fact is, their last three albums (Don’t Believe The Truth, Heathen Chemistry, and Standing On The Shoulder Of Giants) were nothing to write home about. The Gallagher brothers known for their on and off stage fighting , trick you with their new album , “Dig Out Your Soul .” The opening track , “Bag it Up” , comes at you with a drum and bass line right out of the Chemical Brothers , which is the closest you’ll find that this is not an ordinary Oasis album. With guitarist Gem Archer and Bassist Andy Bell filling their roles nicely , Noel Gallagher has allowed them to write the two best songs on the album. “Waiting for the Rapture” is by far the strongest song on the album. As Liam sings “I’m waiting for the rapture alone in my soul tonight” you find yourself thinking “who is this great band?” The sharing of vocal duties on “Dig Out Your Soul” again shows you that Oasis’s best singer may just be Noel. The song “Falling Down” shows some of his best song writing efforts in years. Dave Sardy’s presence is strongly felt as song after song reveals stronger and stronger bass lines from Any Bell. Drumming on “Dig Out Your Soul” is done by Zak Starkey( yes that’s Ringo’s son). And by the way , what’s an anti war song doing on the album? -------- 1.) Spelled band members name wrong 2.) Capitalized random letters 3.) Don't know how to use a semi-colon 4.) Don't know how to use commas --------- All you did was put in every single cliche-review phrase, in addition to the poor puncuation: "Nothing to write home about" "Didn't expect much" "Song after song" "Best song writing in years" ^ Just use those phrases as a template, and you have a review of anything really. ---------- Furthermore, the world choice is horrible to along with the cliches: "Comes at you" -- That's not professional writing!!! "Shows" - stop using that, try "Depict" or "Demonstrate" ---------- So, learn punctuation (especially how to use commas), stop using cliches, and use better diction while adding more substance to the article and an actual conclusion and you'll have a decent review. So come back with your other "unused review" with this in mind, it'll make for a more believable story. And after going into detail here, I've come to the conclusion you're not out of HighSchool yet, let alone college. But even the common High Schooler knows this (at least if we're talking about a Private High School....) D- |
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Aug 5, 2008 11:59:14 GMT -5
Oh, and also don't use contractions in professional writing. "That's" should be "that is", etc
You've sunk to a new low, LDNMN, just when we thought you couldn't get any lower.
|
|
|
|
Post by jimmies on Aug 5, 2008 12:01:46 GMT -5
i feel sorry for the guy.
even though everyone is
trying to tell him to fuck off,
he still is promissing stuff for us,
and defending himself.
I think hes got a some kind of
personal mental disorder or something.
Otherwise hes just a sad little boy.
|
|
|
|
Post by supersonic1983 on Aug 5, 2008 12:02:12 GMT -5
You've sunk to a new low, LDNMN, just when we thought you couldn't get any lower. Fucking hell, will you leave it be? |
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Aug 5, 2008 12:04:55 GMT -5
I wrote this last year - Sophomore in College - this is how you write (got a 96% on this paper, too  ) - Best thing I've ever written, too. It's damn good! You're telling me a college student can write much better than someone who has their degree already and is working as a journalist at a music magazine company? Get lost. Last part of intro:While there was mass support for the United States’ involvement, and while the initial motives were genuine and benevolent in nature, the war was wrought with severe mistakes and miscalculations which ultimately rendered the conflict unwinnable. By the time Richard Nixon entered the White House in 1969, the frustrated and war-weary public demanded an end to this already decade long conflict. Nixon did achieve peace by withdrawing all military forces from Vietnam, but this did not occur until 1975, thus yielding six years of yet more critical mistakes and struggles. Thesis:While the media did indeed negatively impact Nixon’s effort in the conflict and its aftermath, the fact that he used contradictory rhetoric, made tactical military blunders, and shifted the motives from a world-inclusive fight against communism to a self-interested need of preserving credibility, all depict that Nixon had only himself to blame for not achieving “peace with honor” in the Vietnam War. Well crafted segment from argument 1:In 1969, the American public voted in a Republican for the presidency hoping for change and improvement, fed up with the incompetence of the Democrats who created the disarray in the first place. However, Nixon proved to be no different than his liberal counterparts, and perhaps was worse due to the contradictory nature of his policies.
Conclusion:Due to this type of media coverage, it is almost certain that some of Nixon’s actions were negated by the coverage. However, Nixon made far too many mistakes of his own in order for the media to be blamed in any significant way for his blunders or in inability of achieving peace with honor. If Nixon was more confident in his policies, and if he transposed that confidence onto the battlefield while keeping the initial motives and focus of the war in tact perhaps not only would he have achieved peace with honor, but may have also achieved victory. However, the complete opposite occurred. Only Nixon is to blame, not some guy in a suit and tie standing in front of a camera. |
|
|
|
Post by lorddontnoelmenow on Aug 5, 2008 12:06:22 GMT -5
I wrote this last year - Sophomore in College - this is how you write (got a 96% on this paper, too ) - Best thing I've ever written, too. It's damn good! You're telling me a college student can write much better than someone who has their degree already and is working as a journalist at a music magazine company? Get lost. Last part of intro:While there was mass support for the United States’ involvement, and while the initial motives were genuine and benevolent in nature, the war was wrought with severe mistakes and miscalculations which ultimately rendered the conflict unwinnable. By the time Richard Nixon entered the White House in 1969, the frustrated and war-weary public demanded an end to this already decade long conflict. Nixon did achieve peace by withdrawing all military forces from Vietnam, but this did not occur until 1975, thus yielding six years of yet more critical mistakes and struggles. Thesis:While the media did indeed negatively impact Nixon’s effort in the conflict and its aftermath, the fact that he used contradictory rhetoric, made tactical military blunders, and shifted the motives from a world-inclusive fight against communism to a self-interested need of preserving credibility, all depict that Nixon had only himself to blame for not achieving “peace with honor” in the Vietnam War. Well crafted segment from argument 1:In 1969, the American public voted in a Republican for the presidency hoping for change and improvement, fed up with the incompetence of the Democrats who created the disarray in the first place. However, Nixon proved to be no different than his liberal counterparts, and perhaps was worse due to the contradictory nature of his policies.
Conclusion:Due to this type of media coverage, it is almost certain that some of Nixon’s actions were negated by the coverage. However, Nixon made far too many mistakes of his own in order for the media to be blamed in any significant way for his blunders or in inability of achieving peace with honor. If Nixon was more confident in his policies, and if he transposed that confidence onto the battlefield while keeping the initial motives and focus of the war in tact perhaps not only would he have achieved peace with honor, but may have also achieved victory. However, the complete opposite occurred. Only Nixon is to blame, not some guy in a suit and tie standing in front of a camera. you've got way too much time on your hands |
|
|
|
Post by tomlivesforever on Aug 5, 2008 12:08:11 GMT -5
I wrote this last year - Sophomore in College - this is how you write (got a 96% on this paper, too ) - Best thing I've ever written, too. It's damn good! You're telling me a college student can write much better than someone who has their degree already and is working as a journalist at a music magazine company? Get lost. Last part of intro:While there was mass support for the United States’ involvement, and while the initial motives were genuine and benevolent in nature, the war was wrought with severe mistakes and miscalculations which ultimately rendered the conflict unwinnable. By the time Richard Nixon entered the White House in 1969, the frustrated and war-weary public demanded an end to this already decade long conflict. Nixon did achieve peace by withdrawing all military forces from Vietnam, but this did not occur until 1975, thus yielding six years of yet more critical mistakes and struggles. Thesis:While the media did indeed negatively impact Nixon’s effort in the conflict and its aftermath, the fact that he used contradictory rhetoric, made tactical military blunders, and shifted the motives from a world-inclusive fight against communism to a self-interested need of preserving credibility, all depict that Nixon had only himself to blame for not achieving “peace with honor” in the Vietnam War. Well crafted segment from argument 1:In 1969, the American public voted in a Republican for the presidency hoping for change and improvement, fed up with the incompetence of the Democrats who created the disarray in the first place. However, Nixon proved to be no different than his liberal counterparts, and perhaps was worse due to the contradictory nature of his policies.
Conclusion:Due to this type of media coverage, it is almost certain that some of Nixon’s actions were negated by the coverage. However, Nixon made far too many mistakes of his own in order for the media to be blamed in any significant way for his blunders or in inability of achieving peace with honor. If Nixon was more confident in his policies, and if he transposed that confidence onto the battlefield while keeping the initial motives and focus of the war in tact perhaps not only would he have achieved peace with honor, but may have also achieved victory. However, the complete opposite occurred. Only Nixon is to blame, not some guy in a suit and tie standing in front of a camera. F |
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Aug 5, 2008 12:09:15 GMT -5
I wrote this last year - Sophomore in College - this is how you write (got a 96% on this paper, too ) - Best thing I've ever written, too. It's damn good! You're telling me a college student can write much better than someone who has their degree already and is working as a journalist at a music magazine company? Get lost. Last part of intro:While there was mass support for the United States’ involvement, and while the initial motives were genuine and benevolent in nature, the war was wrought with severe mistakes and miscalculations which ultimately rendered the conflict unwinnable. By the time Richard Nixon entered the White House in 1969, the frustrated and war-weary public demanded an end to this already decade long conflict. Nixon did achieve peace by withdrawing all military forces from Vietnam, but this did not occur until 1975, thus yielding six years of yet more critical mistakes and struggles. Thesis:While the media did indeed negatively impact Nixon’s effort in the conflict and its aftermath, the fact that he used contradictory rhetoric, made tactical military blunders, and shifted the motives from a world-inclusive fight against communism to a self-interested need of preserving credibility, all depict that Nixon had only himself to blame for not achieving “peace with honor” in the Vietnam War. Well crafted segment from argument 1:In 1969, the American public voted in a Republican for the presidency hoping for change and improvement, fed up with the incompetence of the Democrats who created the disarray in the first place. However, Nixon proved to be no different than his liberal counterparts, and perhaps was worse due to the contradictory nature of his policies.
Conclusion:Due to this type of media coverage, it is almost certain that some of Nixon’s actions were negated by the coverage. However, Nixon made far too many mistakes of his own in order for the media to be blamed in any significant way for his blunders or in inability of achieving peace with honor. If Nixon was more confident in his policies, and if he transposed that confidence onto the battlefield while keeping the initial motives and focus of the war in tact perhaps not only would he have achieved peace with honor, but may have also achieved victory. However, the complete opposite occurred. Only Nixon is to blame, not some guy in a suit and tie standing in front of a camera. you've got way too much time on your hands Coming from the guy who keeps making stuff up, oh the irony! And if you have even more time on your hands, you would have been able to fake a better review! |
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Aug 5, 2008 12:11:14 GMT -5
I wrote this last year - Sophomore in College - this is how you write (got a 96% on this paper, too ) - Best thing I've ever written, too. It's damn good! You're telling me a college student can write much better than someone who has their degree already and is working as a journalist at a music magazine company? Get lost. Last part of intro:While there was mass support for the United States’ involvement, and while the initial motives were genuine and benevolent in nature, the war was wrought with severe mistakes and miscalculations which ultimately rendered the conflict unwinnable. By the time Richard Nixon entered the White House in 1969, the frustrated and war-weary public demanded an end to this already decade long conflict. Nixon did achieve peace by withdrawing all military forces from Vietnam, but this did not occur until 1975, thus yielding six years of yet more critical mistakes and struggles. Thesis:While the media did indeed negatively impact Nixon’s effort in the conflict and its aftermath, the fact that he used contradictory rhetoric, made tactical military blunders, and shifted the motives from a world-inclusive fight against communism to a self-interested need of preserving credibility, all depict that Nixon had only himself to blame for not achieving “peace with honor” in the Vietnam War. Well crafted segment from argument 1:In 1969, the American public voted in a Republican for the presidency hoping for change and improvement, fed up with the incompetence of the Democrats who created the disarray in the first place. However, Nixon proved to be no different than his liberal counterparts, and perhaps was worse due to the contradictory nature of his policies.
Conclusion:Due to this type of media coverage, it is almost certain that some of Nixon’s actions were negated by the coverage. However, Nixon made far too many mistakes of his own in order for the media to be blamed in any significant way for his blunders or in inability of achieving peace with honor. If Nixon was more confident in his policies, and if he transposed that confidence onto the battlefield while keeping the initial motives and focus of the war in tact perhaps not only would he have achieved peace with honor, but may have also achieved victory. However, the complete opposite occurred. Only Nixon is to blame, not some guy in a suit and tie standing in front of a camera. F lol, try A....sadly, I only got a B in that class but this still remains a great piece of work, and I'll big it up as much as I can. I clearly have talent |
|
|
|
Post by ugottahavefun on Aug 5, 2008 12:12:55 GMT -5
I wrote this last year - Sophomore in College - this is how you write (got a 96% on this paper, too ) - Best thing I've ever written, too. It's damn good! You're telling me a college student can write much better than someone who has their degree already and is working as a journalist at a music magazine company? Get lost. Last part of intro:While there was mass support for the United States’ involvement, and while the initial motives were genuine and benevolent in nature, the war was wrought with severe mistakes and miscalculations which ultimately rendered the conflict unwinnable. By the time Richard Nixon entered the White House in 1969, the frustrated and war-weary public demanded an end to this already decade long conflict. Nixon did achieve peace by withdrawing all military forces from Vietnam, but this did not occur until 1975, thus yielding six years of yet more critical mistakes and struggles. Thesis:While the media did indeed negatively impact Nixon’s effort in the conflict and its aftermath, the fact that he used contradictory rhetoric, made tactical military blunders, and shifted the motives from a world-inclusive fight against communism to a self-interested need of preserving credibility, all depict that Nixon had only himself to blame for not achieving “peace with honor” in the Vietnam War. Well crafted segment from argument 1:In 1969, the American public voted in a Republican for the presidency hoping for change and improvement, fed up with the incompetence of the Democrats who created the disarray in the first place. However, Nixon proved to be no different than his liberal counterparts, and perhaps was worse due to the contradictory nature of his policies.
Conclusion:Due to this type of media coverage, it is almost certain that some of Nixon’s actions were negated by the coverage. However, Nixon made far too many mistakes of his own in order for the media to be blamed in any significant way for his blunders or in inability of achieving peace with honor. If Nixon was more confident in his policies, and if he transposed that confidence onto the battlefield while keeping the initial motives and focus of the war in tact perhaps not only would he have achieved peace with honor, but may have also achieved victory. However, the complete opposite occurred. Only Nixon is to blame, not some guy in a suit and tie standing in front of a camera. you've got way too much time on your hands Notorious , you can't be doing that mate  |
|
|
|
Post by idledreamer on Aug 5, 2008 12:13:04 GMT -5
Bass lines from Any Bell ? A new bassist ? jeezus christ, you now have a frenchman who speaks fucking broken english picking out yer mistakes... yes, tell us--- who is this, this 'any bell' anyway?? |
|
|
|
Post by lorddontnoelmenow on Aug 5, 2008 12:14:59 GMT -5
Bass lines from Any Bell ? A new bassist ? jeezus christ, you now have a frenchman who speaks fucking broken english picking out yer mistakes... yes, tell us--- who is this, this 'any bell' anyway?? Who the fuck is andy bell? |
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Aug 5, 2008 12:16:31 GMT -5
you've got way too much time on your hands Notorious , you can't be doing that mate Doing what? The point is that if some Sophomore college student can write like that, then you'd expect someone at RS to be able to, too. Therefor, that alone discredits this "unused review" and renders it utter pish. |
|
|
|
Post by idledreamer on Aug 5, 2008 12:16:37 GMT -5
Dave Sardy’s presence is strongly felt as song after song reveals stronger and stronger bass lines from Any Bell. MUU- AHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA.......  |
|
|
|
Post by supersonic1983 on Aug 5, 2008 12:18:00 GMT -5
lol, try A....sadly, I only got a B in that class but this still remains a great piece of work, and I'll big it up as much as I can. I clearly have talent  |
|
|
|
Post by tomlivesforever on Aug 5, 2008 12:18:57 GMT -5
lol, try A....sadly, I only got a B in that class but this still remains a great piece of work, and I'll big it up as much as I can. I clearly have talent We're not in class now mate. I'm giving you a forum grade. Its fucking turd. |
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Aug 5, 2008 12:21:04 GMT -5
Bass lines from Any Bell ? A new bassist ? jeezus christ, you now have a frenchman who speaks fucking broken english picking out yer mistakes... yes, tell us--- who is this, this 'any bell' anyway?? ROFL LMFAO  And with that, it's confirmed that this is indeed an unused review, but a faked one at that. I wonder what other crap LDNMN has in store for us now, seeing that he has no credibility what's so ever. My advice mate: Go on another forum and try spreading your lies there. You're done here now. |
|
|
|
Post by lorddontnoelmenow on Aug 5, 2008 12:22:57 GMT -5
jeezus christ, you now have a frenchman who speaks fucking broken english picking out yer mistakes... yes, tell us--- who is this, this 'any bell' anyway?? ROFL LMFAO And with that, it's confirmed that this is indeed an unused review, but a faked one at that. I wonder what other crap LDNMN has in store for us now, seeing that he has no credibility what's so ever. My advice mate: Go on another forum and try spreading your lies there. You're done here now.the truth will soon be upon you.... |
|
|
|
Post by keystone1316 on Aug 5, 2008 12:26:29 GMT -5
I will say that regardless of whether or not noelmedown is lying or not...
this is an absolutely shit review. However, it is possible that this isnt the original review, but that noelmedown quickly transcribed it in a forum post.
Idk though, if thats truly a RS album review, Id really like to apply for a job as a writer there.
|
|
|
|
Post by ugottahavefun on Aug 5, 2008 12:31:34 GMT -5
THis is how you write...
It’s one of life’s greatest delights, I would venture, to wake up in an early mundane hour and to find that no nasty errands or silly appointments are menacingly awaiting one’s most pressing attention for the forthcoming morning. Invariably these mornings are on a Saturday and the happiest waker that can be found is more often than not a schoolboy, elated to have reached such a stage after a taxing week in that rather disgusting institution of schooling…
For with the oncoming rush of consciousness striving to rule, Our Hero puts up a mighty, valiant, albeit quite doomed effort, worthy of an Homeric Epic, to divert this assault, dreading the realisation of another weekday, in which he must plod and trod his way to the enclosed territory of ‘Education for the Masses’. Like a battering ram through a country cottage’s gate these dour thoughts come, stimulating a sudden adrenalinic fire of panic and despair to take over the mind, fully rousing him for a brief moment as he searches for Truth. Quickly he runs down the corridor of the cerebrum, knocking frantically on its four and twenty million doors in his quest for that eternal noun, while unsurity ever so slowly builds.
But then dear Reader, what unparalleled relief and joy is experienced therewith when such fears are deemed false, like promises of Satan, and the waker can plunge back into his pillows, those close brethren of the clouds, in the knowledge that this is the day when Time himself can’t dictate his actions to an unhappy degree.
Together with the celebrated mattress, princely sheets and the regal quilt he regains his golden dream alignment, the great conduit valley, necessary for his nightly journeying to the Land of Nod or it’s evil brother Nord, and half-hopes in this to regain a few atoms of the Dream Dust that may have been left by Sleep herself in order to facilitate for himself a furtherment of tranquil voyaging from the mortal body.
Alas! All that is left is a majestic dwelling on what fruit it would’ve borne, and yet try as he might, his continuations are but pale frustrating imitations with regards to this minor Utopia. Better luck is found on just the remembrance of these episodes, which can be examined in languid leisure half a dozen times in snugglement before they are denied to him like sand to an hourglasses hemisphere, to leave a soothing nothingness, and thus one of the peaks of existence, where a strawberry sunshine is forever present.
This will eventually too fade and incur, mayhaps after an hour’s half (too short!), a most unpleasant action of movement and so, while still being contained in this bowl of warm milk in the grey of early morning gloom, a new line of thought is required before a perception of wakefulness urges the body to vacate this Paradise for the ordinary. There cometh the Radio, whose crackly medium wave reception does more for the soul than any state of the art of television, that with it’s images, are an insult, it seems at this time, to the imagination.
It’s the News Bulletin, for the most part ignored in normal daily activity, now seems of the utmost importance in the pre-rising haze, as does the line deliberated weather report, and the re-plays of comedy shows from the 1970’s seem to our subject to be of the most exuberating bliss, of a world perhaps untainted by all of our faults since Eden. Talk of ‘Fuzzy Wuzzies’ and ‘Stupid Boy’ induce a nostalgic grin of an epoch not seen visually ever before by our Hero.
|
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Aug 5, 2008 12:37:43 GMT -5
THis is how you write... It’s one of life’s greatest delights, I would venture, to wake up in an early mundane hour and to find that no nasty errands or silly appointments are menacingly awaiting one’s most pressing attention for the forthcoming morning. Invariably these mornings are on a Saturday and the happiest waker that can be found is more often than not a schoolboy, elated to have reached such a stage after a taxing week in that rather disgusting institution of schooling… For with the oncoming rush of consciousness striving to rule, Our Hero puts up a mighty, valiant, albeit quite doomed effort, worthy of an Homeric Epic, to divert this assault, dreading the realisation of another weekday, in which he must plod and trod his way to the enclosed territory of ‘Education for the Masses’. Like a battering ram through a country cottage’s gate these dour thoughts come, stimulating a sudden adrenalinic fire of panic and despair to take over the mind, fully rousing him for a brief moment as he searches for Truth. Quickly he runs down the corridor of the cerebrum, knocking frantically on its four and twenty million doors in his quest for that eternal noun, while unsurity ever so slowly builds. But then dear Reader, what unparalleled relief and joy is experienced therewith when such fears are deemed false, like promises of Satan, and the waker can plunge back into his pillows, those close brethren of the clouds, in the knowledge that this is the day when Time himself can’t dictate his actions to an unhappy degree. Together with the celebrated mattress, princely sheets and the regal quilt he regains his golden dream alignment, the great conduit valley, necessary for his nightly journeying to the Land of Nod or it’s evil brother Nord, and half-hopes in this to regain a few atoms of the Dream Dust that may have been left by Sleep herself in order to facilitate for himself a furtherment of tranquil voyaging from the mortal body. Alas! All that is left is a majestic dwelling on what fruit it would’ve borne, and yet try as he might, his continuations are but pale frustrating imitations with regards to this minor Utopia. Better luck is found on just the remembrance of these episodes, which can be examined in languid leisure half a dozen times in snugglement before they are denied to him like sand to an hourglasses hemisphere, to leave a soothing nothingness, and thus one of the peaks of existence, where a strawberry sunshine is forever present. This will eventually too fade and incur, mayhaps after an hour’s half (too short!), a most unpleasant action of movement and so, while still being contained in this bowl of warm milk in the grey of early morning gloom, a new line of thought is required before a perception of wakefulness urges the body to vacate this Paradise for the ordinary. There cometh the Radio, whose crackly medium wave reception does more for the soul than any state of the art of television, that with it’s images, are an insult, it seems at this time, to the imagination. It’s the News Bulletin, for the most part ignored in normal daily activity, now seems of the utmost importance in the pre-rising haze, as does the line deliberated weather report, and the re-plays of comedy shows from the 1970’s seem to our subject to be of the most exuberating bliss, of a world perhaps untainted by all of our faults since Eden. Talk of ‘Fuzzy Wuzzies’ and ‘Stupid Boy’ induce a nostalgic grin of an epoch not seen visually ever before by our Hero. Not bad. But can't compare what either of us wrote - it's two different writing styles for two different things. What you wrote is for a short story, what I wrote is for a paper. Your style fits stories, mine fits editorials (and anything that's not a short story). Credit to you though, that's one thing I can't do - write short stories, it's very hard. The fact that I don't read makes it even harder (which really does beg the question where I developed this talent from -- although I do read many political editorials, and prominent sports (soccer) articles which are written by credible journalists. But what we can compare both our pieces to LDNMN's "review", and both are far superior to it. |
|
|
|
Post by vespa on Aug 5, 2008 12:59:03 GMT -5
who gives a shit how we write?its a fuckin internet forum!were not doing a degree in fuckin law.wether or not this guys lyin or telling the truth?who cares?notorious you need to get a grip studying all these pissing reviews!wait for the album an official reviews if it gets you this wound up.but if this guy aint lying then if i were you id do a runner cos youll have made yourself look like a twat
|
|
|
|
Post by ugottahavefun on Aug 5, 2008 13:13:56 GMT -5
Not bad. But can't compare what either of us wrote - it's two different writing styles for two different things. What you wrote is for a short story, what I wrote is for a paper. Your style fits stories, mine fits editorials (and anything that's not a short story). Credit to you though, that's one thing I can't do - write short stories, it's very hard. The fact that I don't read makes it even harder (which really does beg the question where I developed this talent from -- although I do read many political editorials, and prominent sports (soccer) articles which are written by credible journalists. But what we can compare both our pieces to LDNMN's "review", and both are far superior to it. Agreed. |
|
|
|
Post by Elias on Aug 5, 2008 13:20:50 GMT -5
Why on earth would there be an unused review? Especially one as short as that, hardly seems worth writing anything.
|
|
|
|
Post by wrinklyrocker on Aug 5, 2008 14:36:05 GMT -5
Guys, you have to realise that EVERY time you reply, this guys head inflates even more, and you increase the chances of him posting AGAIN. Yeah this post is a contradiction in itself, but I don't care, someone had to say it. It's attention you are giving him...good or bad it doesn't matter. Just STOP replying, he will then leave quietly. why would i leave if im an oasis fan posting on an oasis fansite?? doesnt make sense to me then fucking post somewhere else other than "i have the album please pay attention to me" and quit shoveling out bullshit. |
|
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5