|
Post by theyknowwhatimean on Nov 29, 2018 10:54:10 GMT -5
To be fair, The Beatles used varispeed quite a lot to pitch their vocals up. For instance, ‘When I’m Sixty-Four’ is sped up by a key to make Macca’s voice sound younger. And then there’s the lashings of slap back echo Lennon applied to his vocals for his solo work. (Although, with that latter example, I think Lennon would have done well to remember that less is more).
|
|
|
Post by matt on Nov 29, 2018 11:58:14 GMT -5
Just think, without autotune we wouldn’t have tools like Olly Murs in the chart.
Autotune is one of those things that I naturally reject as I think about all the terrible X Factor shite that has infested the charts the past decade. However, I can’t blame the tools, I can only blame how it is used and abused in how it gives any talentless fool a chance at being a celebrity.
There more than plenty examples where it’s used as a studio mechanism to enhance the sonic qualities of a tune - when it’s used as a creative tool, then great. When it’s used as a tool to cheat your way to stardom, then it’s one of the worst things ever.
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Nov 29, 2018 11:59:34 GMT -5
Does it work on 2018 Bob Dylan? Can we make him sound like 1965 Bob Dylan again?
|
|
|
Post by MONO on Nov 30, 2018 3:31:36 GMT -5
Tonnes of acts over the years are comparable to The Beatles; comparable does not mean equal to. According to this logic, you can even compare your cousin who knows a few chords on a guitar to the Beatles. It just doesn't make any sense. What Ye and Cudi did as an artistic force between 2008/9 is absolutely reminiscent of the way that The Beatles would take pre-existing technology and rethink how it was incorporated into pop music forever. Great art is great art, no matter when and where it comes from. What Kanye and Kid Cudi did has already been done decades before by Cher's producers in "Believe". You definitely overestimate their cultural influence. For most people out there, Kanye is just Kim Kardashian's weird, trumpist husband and Kudi (if they even know him) is the guy who had one or two hits about 10 years ago...
|
|
|
Post by The Escapist on Nov 30, 2018 7:35:49 GMT -5
Tonnes of acts over the years are comparable to The Beatles; comparable does not mean equal to. According to this logic, you can even compare your cousin who knows a few chords on a guitar to the Beatles. It just doesn't make any sense. What Ye and Cudi did as an artistic force between 2008/9 is absolutely reminiscent of the way that The Beatles would take pre-existing technology and rethink how it was incorporated into pop music forever. Great art is great art, no matter when and where it comes from. What Kanye and Kid Cudi did has already been done decades before by Cher's producers in "Believe". You definitely overestimate their cultural influence. For most people out there, Kanye is just Kim Kardashian's weird, trumpist husband and Kudi (if they even know him) is the guy who had one or two hits about 10 years ago... Absolutely it does, because "comparable" does not mean "equal to". I can compare Patrick Troughton, the second Doctor, to The Beatles, because he has the same haircut - it doesn't mean he could write Dear Prudence. Kanye is comparable to The Beatles because of his influence, creativity, and consistency in music. And no-one is saying that he was the first to use vocal effects, so unless Cher brought a melodic and vulnerable sound to hip-hop (which I'm gonna go out on a limb and say she didn't) then the point is totally moot. And the people who would characterise Kanye and Cudi like that are generally over-thirty, and know extremely little about hip-hop or modern music. It's true that to older music fans, Kanye is typically seen as a moron celebrity, but for the vast majority of younger music fans, he's a controversial genius. You might hate him, but very few would dispute that he is one of the most important and iconic artists of the century. Side-Note: I dislike the noise thing tacked onto the end of Strawberry Fields. Considering editing it out.
|
|
|
Post by The Escapist on Nov 30, 2018 7:38:18 GMT -5
To be fair, The Beatles used varispeed quite a lot to pitch their vocals up. For instance, ‘When I’m Sixty-Four’ is sped up by a key to make Macca’s voice sound younger. And then there’s the lashings of slap back echo Lennon applied to his vocals for his solo work. (Although, with that latter example, I think Lennon would have done well to remember that less is more). I'm not sure if that's ironic or perfectly fitting.
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Nov 30, 2018 8:08:47 GMT -5
According to this logic, you can even compare your cousin who knows a few chords on a guitar to the Beatles. It just doesn't make any sense. What Kanye and Kid Cudi did has already been done decades before by Cher's producers in "Believe". You definitely overestimate their cultural influence. For most people out there, Kanye is just Kim Kardashian's weird, trumpist husband and Kudi (if they even know him) is the guy who had one or two hits about 10 years ago... Absolutely it does, because "comparable" does not mean "equal to". I can compare Patrick Troughton, the second Doctor, to The Beatles, because he has the same haircut - it doesn't mean he could write Dear Prudence. Kanye is comparable to The Beatles because of his influence, creativity, and consistency in music. And no-one is saying that he was the first to use vocal effects, so unless Cher brought a melodic and vulnerable sound to hip-hop (which I'm gonna go out on a limb and say she didn't) then the point is totally moot. And the people who would characterise Kanye and Cudi like that are generally over-thirty, and know extremely little about hip-hop or modern music. It's true that to older music fans, Kanye is typically seen as a moron celebrity, but for the vast majority of younger music fans, he's a controversial genius. You might hate him, but very few would dispute that he is one of the most important and iconic artists of the century. Side-Note: I dislike the noise thing tacked onto the end of Strawberry Fields. Considering editing it out. I find offense in that statement. You do realize people in their 30s were once young and in their teens and twenties right? For example when Kaynes first two mega hit record came out I was 22 and 23. Now I’m 37, like a lot of his original fans. We got older. I lived thru the excitement and the fun hype. Back then it was mostly if not all about the music. He’s changed. Most people would agree to that. His music is also just not as good as it was 13-15 years ago. Doesn’t matter the volume, the quality doesn’t match. Meanwhile I’m willing to bet that during kaynes breakthrough years you were probably 8-9 years old and are now retroactively going back to judge his work and I guess us “30 year olds who don’t know hip hop or modern music”. Shit, most of the “modern” music (Radiohead, Oasis, Coldplay, arcade Fire, Kanye, etc) you post about on this forum was made before you were 12 years old and the people that helped make those bands and albums hits were in their early 20s. So yes, us “30 year olds” get and understand hip hop and modern music.
|
|
|
Post by The Escapist on Nov 30, 2018 8:17:50 GMT -5
Absolutely it does, because "comparable" does not mean "equal to". I can compare Patrick Troughton, the second Doctor, to The Beatles, because he has the same haircut - it doesn't mean he could write Dear Prudence. Kanye is comparable to The Beatles because of his influence, creativity, and consistency in music. And no-one is saying that he was the first to use vocal effects, so unless Cher brought a melodic and vulnerable sound to hip-hop (which I'm gonna go out on a limb and say she didn't) then the point is totally moot. And the people who would characterise Kanye and Cudi like that are generally over-thirty, and know extremely little about hip-hop or modern music. It's true that to older music fans, Kanye is typically seen as a moron celebrity, but for the vast majority of younger music fans, he's a controversial genius. You might hate him, but very few would dispute that he is one of the most important and iconic artists of the century. Side-Note: I dislike the noise thing tacked onto the end of Strawberry Fields. Considering editing it out. I find offense in that statement. You do realize people in their 30s were once young and in their teens and twenties right? For example when Kaynes first two mega hit record came out I was 22 and 23. Now I’m 37, like a lot of his original fans. We got older. I lived thru the excitement and the fun hype. Back then it was mostly if not all about the music. He’s changed. Most people would agree to that. His music is also just not as good as it was 13-15 years ago. Doesn’t matter the volume, the quality doesn’t match. Meanwhile I’m willing to bet that during kaynes breakthrough years you were probably 8-9 years old and are now retroactively going back to judge his work and I guess us “30 year olds who don’t know hip hop or modern music”. Shit, most of the “modern” music (Radiohead, Oasis, Coldplay, arcade Fire, Kanye, etc) you post about on this forum was made before you were 12 years old and the people that helped make those bands and albums hits were in their early 20s. So yes, us “30 year olds” get and understand hip hop and modern music. This is the classic "all thumbs are fingers, but not all fingers are thumbs" scenario. I agree, tonnes of over-thirties know about modern music and I'm sure you're one of them - I never said anything to disagree with that. What I said is that the people who would characterise artists like Kanye as talentless idiots will, the vast majority of the time, be over-thirty. That's not to say that if you're young you have to like him, or if you're old you have to hate him, but the attitude that artists like him or other hip-hop stars are talentless idiots has generally transposed from being a racial idea to an age/cultural one. Be honest, do you disagree?
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Nov 30, 2018 8:20:42 GMT -5
I find offense in that statement. You do realize people in their 30s were once young and in their teens and twenties right? For example when Kaynes first two mega hit record came out I was 22 and 23. Now I’m 37, like a lot of his original fans. We got older. I lived thru the excitement and the fun hype. Back then it was mostly if not all about the music. He’s changed. Most people would agree to that. His music is also just not as good as it was 13-15 years ago. Doesn’t matter the volume, the quality doesn’t match. Meanwhile I’m willing to bet that during kaynes breakthrough years you were probably 8-9 years old and are now retroactively going back to judge his work and I guess us “30 year olds who don’t know hip hop or modern music”. Shit, most of the “modern” music (Radiohead, Oasis, Coldplay, arcade Fire, Kanye, etc) you post about on this forum was made before you were 12 years old and the people that helped make those bands and albums hits were in their early 20s. So yes, us “30 year olds” get and understand hip hop and modern music. This is the classic "all thumbs are fingers, but not all fingers are thumbs" scenario. I agree, tonnes of over-thirties know about modern music and I'm sure you're one of them - I never said anything to disagree with that. What I said is that the people who would characterise artists like Kanye as talentless idiots will, the vast majority of the time, be over-thirty. That's not to say that if you're young you have to like him, or if you're old you have to hate him, but the attitude that artists like him or other hip-hop stars are talentless idiots has generally transposed from being a racial idea to an age/cultural one. Be honest, do you disagree? I’m gonna be honest. There were plenty of young people who thought he was an idiot back in 2004-2005 as well. You just hear about it more now because of social media. But trust me, it’s the same. Like all bands or artists, there will always be a faction of people who don’t like you. All walks of life and ages.
|
|
|
Post by The Escapist on Nov 30, 2018 8:22:56 GMT -5
This is the classic "all thumbs are fingers, but not all fingers are thumbs" scenario. I agree, tonnes of over-thirties know about modern music and I'm sure you're one of them - I never said anything to disagree with that. What I said is that the people who would characterise artists like Kanye as talentless idiots will, the vast majority of the time, be over-thirty. That's not to say that if you're young you have to like him, or if you're old you have to hate him, but the attitude that artists like him or other hip-hop stars are talentless idiots has generally transposed from being a racial idea to an age/cultural one. Be honest, do you disagree? I’m gonna be honest. There were plenty of young people who thought he was an idiot back in 2004-2005 as well. You just hear about it more now because of social media. But trust me, it’s the same. Like all bands or artists, there will always be a faction of people who don’t like you. All walks of life and ages. Yeah, you're right - but that's not my point. My point is that the percentage of people who think people like Kanye, Cudi, Travis Scott, etc...are talentless morons will be vastly higher among over-thirties than under-thirties. I don't see how you can disagree with that, it's just so blatantly true. And, of course, it works both ways. People under the age of twenty are more likely to dismiss great older acts like Simon and Garfunkel or, indeed, The Beatles. That doesn't mean all younger people do, or no older people dislike those acts too, it's just a feature of music culture in 2018, which is divided by age more than race or culture, possibly for the first time ever. Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Nov 30, 2018 8:30:48 GMT -5
I’m gonna be honest. There were plenty of young people who thought he was an idiot back in 2004-2005 as well. You just hear about it more now because of social media. But trust me, it’s the same. Like all bands or artists, there will always be a faction of people who don’t like you. All walks of life and ages. Yeah, you're right - but that's not my point. My point is that the percentage of people who think people like Kanye, Cudi, Travis Scott, etc...are talentless morons will be vastly higher among over-thirties than under-thirties. I don't see how you can disagree with that, it's just so blatantly true. And what are you basing that on? I can flat out tell you when in college I knew just as many people who didn’t like Kanye. They were all in their 20s. I can say the same for bands like Oasis and Radiohead in high school in the 90s. For every fan I found I can easily find the same amount who found those bands either depressing or Beatle Ripoffs. Also in their teens. And I’m sure people in their 20s and 30s echoed similar thoughts at the same time. You are definitely being too broad and general. You aren’t acknowledging people of ur own age group who currently think Kanye is an idiot. Trust me they are out there in force. Bottom line is some people like Kanye. Others don’t. I wouldn’t bring age into it. Because like I said I probably know more 20 year olds who think he’s an idiot than 30 year olds.
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Nov 30, 2018 8:37:23 GMT -5
And what are you basing that on? I can flat out tell you when in college I knew just as many people who didn’t like Kanye. They were all in their 20s. I can say the same for bands like Oasis and Radiohead in high school in the 90s. For every fan I found I can easily find the same amount who found those bands either depressing or Beatle Ripoffs. Also in their teens. And I’m sure people in their 20s and 30s echoed similar thoughts at the same time. You are definitely being too broad and general. You aren’t acknowledging people of ur own age group who currently think Kanye is an idiot. Trust me they are out there in force. Bottom line is some people like Kanye. Others don’t. I wouldn’t bring age into it. Because like I said I probably know more 20 year olds who think he’s an idiot than 30 year olds. Let's take a step back here. Are you really arguing that the portion of people who dismiss modern rap stars as talentless is the same across all age groups? Really? I didn’t say that and you are getting way off point. My remarks are on your statement that “30 year olds don’t know hip hop or modern music”. We do. We were there when all this shit went down. I find that remake offensive. And like I said, there are people in all age groups who like and dislike hip hop or rock or indie or whatever. You are being too broad. That is my point. You keep saying 30 year olds don’t get or like Kanye. And I’m directly telling you that 12-15 years ago people had the same thoughts as today. They had them in their 20s and again in their 30s. You are just reacting more to it because of social media and ur own opinions.
|
|
|
Post by The Escapist on Nov 30, 2018 8:43:16 GMT -5
Let's take a step back here. Are you really arguing that the portion of people who dismiss modern rap stars as talentless is the same across all age groups? Really? I didn’t say that and you are getting way off point. My remarks are on your statement that “30 year olds don’t know hip hop or modern music”. We do. We were there when all this shit went down. I find that remake offensive. And like I said, there are people in all age groups who like and dislike hip hop or rock or indie or whatever. You are being too broad. That is my point. You keep saying 30 year olds don’t get or like Kanye. And I’m direcgly telling you that 12-15 years ago people had the same thoughts as today. They had them in their 20s and again in their 30s. You are just reacting more to it because of social media and ur own opinions. Okay, here's a challenge for you. Find where I said that statement. I never did. My statement was this: The people who characterise modern rap acts like Kanye as talentless are, the majority of the time, over-thirty.The classifier in that statement is people who characterise modern rap acts like Kanye as talentless. You're getting confused between that, and all over-thirties. Even if I'm only talking about 3% of other-thirties, the point is that will be a larger number than the people who characterise modern rap acts like Kanye as talentless who are under-thirty. At no point did I say young people couldn't think that, or that all older people do, just that if we look purely at the human beings who think modern rap stars are talentless idiots, then the majority of them will be over-thirty. I apologise for any offence you took, but the statements you're attributing to me simply didn't happen.
|
|
|
Post by MONO on Nov 30, 2018 8:54:27 GMT -5
For example when Kaynes first two mega hit record came out I was 22 and 23. Now I’m 37, like a lot of his original fans. We got older. I lived thru the excitement and the fun hype. Back then it was mostly if not all about the music. He’s changed. Most people would agree to that. Those were the days he was still famous for his songs. Today, he's only famous for being Kanye. And definitely not for "White Album"-like influences on music with side projects most people never heard of.
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Nov 30, 2018 8:57:53 GMT -5
According to this logic, you can even compare your cousin who knows a few chords on a guitar to the Beatles. It just doesn't make any sense. What Kanye and Kid Cudi did has already been done decades before by Cher's producers in "Believe". You definitely overestimate their cultural influence. For most people out there, Kanye is just Kim Kardashian's weird, trumpist husband and Kudi (if they even know him) is the guy who had one or two hits about 10 years ago... Absolutely it does, because "comparable" does not mean "equal to". I can compare Patrick Troughton, the second Doctor, to The Beatles, because he has the same haircut - it doesn't mean he could write Dear Prudence. Kanye is comparable to The Beatles because of his influence, creativity, and consistency in music. And no-one is saying that he was the first to use vocal effects, so unless Cher brought a melodic and vulnerable sound to hip-hop (which I'm gonna go out on a limb and say she didn't) then the point is totally moot. And the people who would characterise Kanye and Cudi like that are generally over-thirty, and know extremely little about hip-hop or modern music.  ;It's true that to older music fans, Kanye is typically seen as a moron celebrity, but for the vast majority of younger music fans, he's a controversial genius. You might hate him, but very few would dispute that he is one of the most important and iconic artists of the century. Side-Note: I dislike the noise thing tacked onto the end of Strawberry Fields. Considering editing it out. I mean this supports what I'm talking about. You are just completely firing from the hip. I know so many 20 year olds who don't like him at all and do not consider him a genius of any kind. They see him as someone who had huge records a decade ago and is now making less impactful music. That is the nature of the beast for all artists it seems. I still know plenty of 30 year olds who like him, especially his early stuff but they all pretty much acknowledge his glory days are over. Has nothing to do with age since I'm telling you that two different groups of people come to the same conclusion.
|
|
|
Post by The Escapist on Nov 30, 2018 9:12:10 GMT -5
Absolutely it does, because "comparable" does not mean "equal to". I can compare Patrick Troughton, the second Doctor, to The Beatles, because he has the same haircut - it doesn't mean he could write Dear Prudence. Kanye is comparable to The Beatles because of his influence, creativity, and consistency in music. And no-one is saying that he was the first to use vocal effects, so unless Cher brought a melodic and vulnerable sound to hip-hop (which I'm gonna go out on a limb and say she didn't) then the point is totally moot. And the people who would characterise Kanye and Cudi like that are generally over-thirty, and know extremely little about hip-hop or modern music. ;It's true that to older music fans, Kanye is typically seen as a moron celebrity, but for the vast majority of younger music fans, he's a controversial genius. You might hate him, but very few would dispute that he is one of the most important and iconic artists of the century. Side-Note: I dislike the noise thing tacked onto the end of Strawberry Fields. Considering editing it out. I mean this supports what I'm talking about. You are just completely firing from the hip. I know so many 20 year olds who don't like him at all and do not consider him a genius of any kind. They see him as someone who had huge records a decade ago and is now making less impactful music. That is the nature of the beast for all artists it seems. I still know plenty of 30 year olds who like him, especially his early stuff but they all pretty much acknowledge his glory days are over. Has nothing to do with age since I'm telling you that two different groups of people come to the same conclusion. Okay, but you have to admit that you misread my comment about over-thirties entirely. I maintain that the people who consider Kanye a genius are much more likely to be young than old, and the people who consider him talentless are much more likely to be old than young. At no point did I comment on over-thirties at large, or even pass comment on those two different points of view, I merely pointed out that age is a massive factor in people's perception of modern rap stars. Clearly we have very different experiences of what people in my age group think of such music. Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by theyknowwhatimean on Nov 30, 2018 9:27:37 GMT -5
To be fair, The Beatles used varispeed quite a lot to pitch their vocals up. For instance, ‘When I’m Sixty-Four’ is sped up by a key to make Macca’s voice sound younger. And then there’s the lashings of slap back echo Lennon applied to his vocals for his solo work. (Although, with that latter example, I think Lennon would have done well to remember that less is more). I'm not sure if that's ironic or perfectly fitting. Eh?
|
|
|
Post by The Escapist on Nov 30, 2018 9:29:29 GMT -5
I'm not sure if that's ironic or perfectly fitting. Eh? Making him sound younger for a song about getting older?
|
|
|
Post by theyknowwhatimean on Nov 30, 2018 9:35:52 GMT -5
Making him sound younger for a song about getting older? Yeah, but he wrote it when he was 16, didn’t he? In 1958. One of his earliest compositions. They used to do in their sets at Hamburg, whenever the power went out. So I guess Paul wanted his voice higher to mimic how he sounded then. Also, the track was sounding quite lumpen and dirge-like at the speed they originally recorded it (have a listen of ‘Take 2’ on the “Deluxe Edition” of Pepper on your streaming service of choice).
|
|
|
Post by The Escapist on Nov 30, 2018 9:40:44 GMT -5
Making him sound younger for a song about getting older? Yeah, but he wrote it when he was 16, didn’t he? In 1958. One of his earliest compositions. They used to do in their sets at Hamburg, whenever the power went out. So I guess Paul wanted his voice higher to mimic how he sounded then. Also, the track was sounding quite lumpen and dirge-like at the speed they originally recorded it (have a listen of ‘Take 2’ on the “Deluxe Edition” of Pepper on your streaming service of choice). "Like a creepy tiny little vampire hovering around his lonely palace" - Matt Morgan
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Nov 30, 2018 9:50:42 GMT -5
I mean this supports what I'm talking about. You are just completely firing from the hip. I know so many 20 year olds who don't like him at all and do not consider him a genius of any kind. They see him as someone who had huge records a decade ago and is now making less impactful music. That is the nature of the beast for all artists it seems. I still know plenty of 30 year olds who like him, especially his early stuff but they all pretty much acknowledge his glory days are over. Has nothing to do with age since I'm telling you that two different groups of people come to the same conclusion. Okay, but you have to admit that you misread my comment about over-thirties entirely. I maintain that the people who consider Kanye a genius are much more likely to be young than old, and the people who consider him talentless are much more likely to be old than young. At no point did I comment on over-thirties at large, or even pass comment on those two different points of view, I merely pointed out that age is a massive factor in people's perception of modern rap stars. Clearly we have very different experiences of what people in my age group think of such music. Thanks. Why would the Kanye fan who thinks he is a genius be younger? It was the 30 to early 40 year old fan (20s and 30s at the time) who saw him in his prime on his rise up, cherished those records and singles. Lived it in real time. To me that is the fan base who should be saying the genius comments. The people who experienced It in real time. 20 year olds were mosty too young for that fruitful time of his creative life to appreciate it to its max. For them it’s a retrospective look back.
|
|
|
Post by The Escapist on Nov 30, 2018 9:54:36 GMT -5
Okay, but you have to admit that you misread my comment about over-thirties entirely. I maintain that the people who consider Kanye a genius are much more likely to be young than old, and the people who consider him talentless are much more likely to be old than young. At no point did I comment on over-thirties at large, or even pass comment on those two different points of view, I merely pointed out that age is a massive factor in people's perception of modern rap stars. Clearly we have very different experiences of what people in my age group think of such music. Thanks. Why would the Kanye fan who thinks he is a genius be younger? It was the 30 to early 40 year old fan (20s and 30s at the time) who saw him in his prime on his rise up, cherished those records and singles. Lived it in real time. To me that is the fan base who should be saying the genius comments. The people who experienced It in real time. 20 year olds were mosty too young for that fruitful time of his creative life to appreciate it to its max. For them it’s a retrospective look back. Again, you're misunderstanding my point. I agree with this post even though most people I know prefer new-Kanye, but I'm not talking about Kanye fans, I'm talking about people who think he's talentless - those people are much more likely to be over-thirty. I really don't see what you're arguing about.
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Nov 30, 2018 10:10:19 GMT -5
Why would the Kanye fan who thinks he is a genius be younger? It was the 30 to early 40 year old fan (20s and 30s at the time) who saw him in his prime on his rise up, cherished those records and singles. Lived it in real time. To me that is the fan base who should be saying the genius comments. The people who experienced It in real time. 20 year olds were mosty too young for that fruitful time of his creative life to appreciate it to its max. For them it’s a retrospective look back. Again, you're misunderstanding my point. I agree with this post even though most people I know prefer new-Kanye, but I'm not talking about Kanye fans, I'm talking about people who think he's talentless - those people are much more likely to be over-thirty. I really don't see what you're arguing about. My point is and I’ve said it a couple times, you’re being too broad with your Kanye take. I’m saying I’ve seen it just as much the other way. I think you are looking too down on people over 30. Gotta be honest, I don’t hear too many people over 30 talk of him anymore unless it’s about his theatrics which dominate his headlines or the constant pushback of albums. It’s hard to be a Kanye fan in 2018. Too many antics when it should just be about the music. I also personally don’t know many people who would pick new Kanye over old Kanye. Maybe I know and work with bizarre people. It’s kinda like I don’t know many people who prefer post 2000s Oasis over their peak period. That’s an interesting and minority’s view take.
|
|
|
Post by The Escapist on Nov 30, 2018 10:18:35 GMT -5
Again, you're misunderstanding my point. I agree with this post even though most people I know prefer new-Kanye, but I'm not talking about Kanye fans, I'm talking about people who think he's talentless - those people are much more likely to be over-thirty. I really don't see what you're arguing about. My point is and I’ve said it a couple times, you’re being too broad with your Kanye take. I’m saying I’ve seen it just as much the other way. I think you are looking too down on people over 30. Gotta be honest, I don’t hear too many people over 30 talk of him anymore unless it’s about his theatrics which dominate his headlines or the constant pushback of albums. It’s hard to be a Kanye fan in 2018. Too many antics when it should just be about the music. I also personally don’t know many people who would pick new Kanye over old Kanye. Maybe I know and work with bizarre people. It’s kinda like I don’t know many people who prefer post 2000s Oasis over their peak period. That’s an interesting and minority’s view take. I honestly don't think we're disagreeing on much, save which part of Kanye's career is best (personally I'll easily take records like Yeezus or Pablo over Graduation, but that's obviously a personal thing). Let's say we took all the people in the world who considered people like Kanye / Travis Scott / Cudi / Kendrick talentless - do you really think there'd be an even age spreading? I'm not saying all of them would be over-thirty, or that there would be no under-thirties, but I would bet every single possession I own on the fact that there would be a hell of a lot more of the former than the latter. That's not a comment on you or any of the cool over-thirties I know, it's just a fact of the culture we live in - like I said, if you did the same thing with a similarly ignorant take like "The Beatles were just a boy band", you'd get a lot more younger people than older people. That's my point - that when you have outlier opinions on music culture like those two, they will often be based on biasing factors like age.
|
|
|
Post by fabulousbakers on Nov 30, 2018 20:51:13 GMT -5
Yeah, but he wrote it when he was 16, didn’t he? In 1958. One of his earliest compositions. They used to do in their sets at Hamburg, whenever the power went out. So I guess Paul wanted his voice higher to mimic how he sounded then. Also, the track was sounding quite lumpen and dirge-like at the speed they originally recorded it (have a listen of ‘Take 2’ on the “Deluxe Edition” of Pepper on your streaming service of choice). Yes but I think it was deliberately recorded too slow because they already knew they were going to speed it up when it was finished to make it sound like a younger man singing. They didn't finish it then decide it was too slow and needed speeding up.
|
|