|
Post by jakob61907 on May 9, 2015 21:00:21 GMT -5
Socialists look at a guy driving down the street in a brand new BMW and say "look at that rich fucker, I'm going to drag him down to my level some day" Normal people look at a guy driving down the street in a brand new BMW and say "look at him, I hope to be as successful as him some day and own a car like that" Ridiculous! You can be both!! The big problem with the rich and elites is that they inherited it all. How can that be successful?? I'm more than happy for people to drive whatever they want and live however they want if they completely earnt their money and not due to having a rich daddy and mommy. I don't think people here are full on socialists they just believe that corporations should pay their fair way and have a society where you have equal opportunites no matter what creed or socio economic environment you come from. We're hardly all commies which I think is what you think.
|
|
|
Post by Let It Bleed on May 9, 2015 21:26:03 GMT -5
It's almost like how U.S. Republicans have whined during the entire length of Barack Obama's presidency, and tried to undermine anything and everything, including literally voting to shut down federal government. God bless. That's how the US government works. Never mind the fact that Obama had complete control of both houses during his first term! Ignoring his policies, Obama is a very poor politician (great on the campaign, but he never could apply that to his office persona). And you just watch the left's response when Jeb Bush is elected next year - it will be akin to silly, inconsequential protests for a few days before everyone moves on and accepts the result (like London right now). Hiallry Clinton's going to win....you may remember me telling you that Barry O. would win numerous times during both his campaigns. You may wonder how I know these things? It's because I look at the situation objectively because I don't really care. Just make sure you get all information and "facts" from FOX News and other completely biased sources. Way too many people sick of Republicans and their absolute bullshit and backward thinking. Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on May 9, 2015 21:45:20 GMT -5
That's how the US government works. Never mind the fact that Obama had complete control of both houses during his first term! Ignoring his policies, Obama is a very poor politician (great on the campaign, but he never could apply that to his office persona). And you just watch the left's response when Jeb Bush is elected next year - it will be akin to silly, inconsequential protests for a few days before everyone moves on and accepts the result (like London right now). Hiallry Clinton's going to win....you may remember me telling you that Barry O. would win numerous times during both his campaigns. You may wonder how I know these things? It's because I look at the situation objectively because I don't really care. Just make sure you get all information and "facts" from FOX News and other completely biased sources. Way too many people sick of Republicans and their absolute bullshit and backward thinking. Thanks. This world's an ugly place, but you're so beautiful to me. Good tidings. x
|
|
|
Post by globe on May 10, 2015 5:05:47 GMT -5
The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of someone else's money Quoting Thatcher, the peadophile protector? You must be so proud of yourself.
|
|
|
Post by theyknowwhatimean on May 10, 2015 5:06:30 GMT -5
The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of someone else's money Quoting Thatcher, the peadophile protector? You must be so proud of yourself.
|
|
|
Post by deasy on May 10, 2015 8:02:18 GMT -5
The above angry responses to my posts just show why socialism will never work. Loads of insults, from stupid to c unt and not a single argument against what I said.
Thankfully socialism is a minority in the majority of the world (except Greece - and that is going very well for them)
[sarcasm]Ye'd do very well in a debate[/sarcasm]
|
|
|
Post by deasy on May 10, 2015 8:03:14 GMT -5
The problem with socialism is that you eventually run out of someone else's money Quoting Thatcher, the peadophile protector? You must be so proud of yourself. What does that have to do with economic policy?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2015 9:08:29 GMT -5
The above angry responses to my posts just show why socialism will never work. Loads of insults, from stupid to c unt and not a single argument against what I said. Thankfully socialism is a minority in the majority of the world (except Greece - and that is going very well for them) [sarcasm]Ye'd do very well in a debate[/sarcasm] You didn't actually come up with any argument on your own, you just used other people's quotes. The argument you did come up with (the BMW one) was completely baseless. Tell me exactly what you think without parroting catch phrases from dead politicians. Then I will respond with a decent argument.
|
|
|
Post by globe on May 10, 2015 9:15:41 GMT -5
Quoting Thatcher, the peadophile protector? You must be so proud of yourself. What does that have to do with economic policy? Keep tugging your forelock son.
|
|
|
Post by deasy on May 10, 2015 9:26:14 GMT -5
What does that have to do with economic policy? Keep tugging your forelock son. More insults? Cool.
|
|
|
Post by deasy on May 10, 2015 9:28:25 GMT -5
I'll leave ye with 2 more comments and then leave it at that. No point in posting if I'm just going to get childish insults/abuse in response rather than an actual adult discussion:
1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity.
2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2015 9:28:34 GMT -5
Keep tugging your forelock son. More insults? Cool. If you actually give a decent, independently thought out argument then people will stop insulting you.
|
|
|
Post by globe on May 10, 2015 9:35:17 GMT -5
I'll leave ye with 2 more comments and then leave it at that. No point in posting if I'm just going to get childish insults/abuse in response rather than an actual adult discussion: 1. You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity. 2. What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. What adult discussion? You've so far quoted Thatcher and now a came away with a couple of more sound-bite comments that don't actually mean anything out there in the real world.
|
|
|
Post by Elie De Beaufour 🐴 on May 10, 2015 10:02:25 GMT -5
It's almost like how U.S. Republicans have whined during the entire length of Barack Obama's presidency, and tried to undermine anything and everything, including literally voting to shut down federal government. God bless. That's how the US government works. Never mind the fact that Obama had complete control of both houses during his first term! Ignoring his policies, Obama is a very poor politician (great on the campaign, but he never could apply that to his office persona). And you just watch the left's response when Jeb Bush is elected next year - it will be akin to silly, inconsequential protests for a few days before everyone moves on and accepts the result (like London right now). David D Duke (yes KKKlansman, I am using your name asshole) wants to be president too so 'All Jews and nigg*rs will die'. Didn't know the KKK were allowed to vote.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 10, 2015 11:00:08 GMT -5
The above angry responses to my posts just show why socialism will never work. Loads of insults, from stupid to c unt and not a single argument against what I said. Thankfully socialism is a minority in the majority of the world (except Greece - and that is going very well for them) [sarcasm]Ye'd do very well in a debate[/sarcasm] Yes - a few posts on an Oasis forum has deconstructed socialism. You'd do very well on Fox News (not sarcasm)
|
|
|
Post by supersonic1983 on May 11, 2015 2:18:01 GMT -5
What one person receives without working for, another person must work for without receiving. That's capitalism, isn't it?
|
|