Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2015 17:55:27 GMT -5
For me 1999 because Bonehead and Guigsy left. The real Oasis split in 1999. 2000 was just Noel and Liam
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2015 18:13:14 GMT -5
2007, because of the embrassingly poor performance at the BRITs
|
|
|
|
Post by World71R on Apr 5, 2015 18:32:14 GMT -5
1999, with a dishonourable mention to 2004 and 2009 (struggling to get an album made in 04, band breaking up in 09)
|
|
|
|
Post by glider on Apr 5, 2015 18:37:42 GMT -5
1999. The fame deteriorated. Bonehead and Guigsy left. Noel was bored of songwriting. A bunch of family drama etc. Getting sued by Tony. The death of Britpop and the desperate need for them to reinvent their sound.
|
|
|
|
Post by underneaththesky on Apr 5, 2015 19:29:52 GMT -5
2004 (GLASTONBURY)
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 5, 2015 19:34:58 GMT -5
When did Noel quit overseas touring? 2001?
|
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Apr 5, 2015 19:42:19 GMT -5
1999-2000
|
|
|
|
Post by supernovadragon on Apr 6, 2015 12:48:43 GMT -5
01, Because of the failed Heathen Chemistry
|
|
|
|
Post by Mean Mrs. Mustard on Apr 6, 2015 13:55:06 GMT -5
01, Because of the failed Heathen Chemistry Heathen Chemistry came out in 2002 |
|
|
|
Post by supernovadragon on Apr 6, 2015 14:16:18 GMT -5
01, Because of the failed Heathen Chemistry Heathen Chemistry came out in 2002 I know it did, I meant the original one from when it was meant to be released in 01...they rerecorded the album didn't they? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 6, 2015 14:27:53 GMT -5
gotta be 99 lost bonehead and guigs , dont see how HC year can be in convo
ok alot of people here arent huge fans of it , but it went to number 1 in uk , they toured without too much drama ( i forget if thats the tour noel got into a car accident in states and liam lost teeth in fight )
but nme gave it a solid 7 or 8 of ten they played 2 sold out beacon shows in nyc that were great , thought all in all not a bad comeback from the dissaray they were in losing bonehead and guigs and getting hammered in press over sotsog
|
|
|
|
Post by Mean Mrs. Mustard on Apr 6, 2015 14:35:01 GMT -5
Yeah defo 1999. Tbh I don't think HC is THAT bad. I think DBTT is worse.
|
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Apr 6, 2015 17:58:42 GMT -5
Yeah defo 1999. Tbh I don't think HC is THAT bad. I think DBTT is worse. And this is why women shouldn't be allowed to voice their opinions. |
|
|
|
Post by matt on Apr 6, 2015 22:51:10 GMT -5
1999 marked the end of the Oasis we all love - this was the band that got us on this forum.
Maybe I'm too sentimentally attached to the 90s, but from there on in, it was mediocre albums with just a spattering of great tunes sadly.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 7, 2015 3:02:11 GMT -5
Yeah defo 1999. Tbh I don't think HC is THAT bad. I think DBTT is worse. And this is why women shouldn't be allowed to voice their opinions. I wonder if our two active mods feel the same way. |
|
|
|
Post by themanwithnoname on Apr 7, 2015 5:00:33 GMT -5
Controversially perhaps, I'm going for 1997.
There was so much expectation ahead of the third album, then it came out and it wasn't nearly as good as the first two.
From that point on the excitement and buzz died down and Oasis kind of became just another band. The aura of invincibility and the idea that they could actually be "the next Beatles" or whatever just died a death.
Be Here Now is judged less harshly these days, including by me. But at the time it felt like the end of something truly magical.
Second choice would be 1999.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mean Mrs. Mustard on Apr 7, 2015 7:05:06 GMT -5
Yeah defo 1999. Tbh I don't think HC is THAT bad. I think DBTT is worse. And this is why women shouldn't be allowed to voice their opinions. Fucking chauvinist. |
|
|
|
Post by PollyWantsACracker on Apr 24, 2015 6:08:34 GMT -5
1999 marked the end of the Oasis we all love - this was the band that got us on this forum. Maybe I'm too sentimentally attached to the 90s, but from there on in, it was mediocre albums with just a spattering of great tunes sadly. Your not saying Standing On The Shoulder of Giants was shit now, are you??? Don't diss that album man, its my personal favorite Oasis album, actually. And you'll probably kill me for saying this, but Put Yer Money Where Yer Mouth Is is in my top 5 on it. Literally, EVERYONE on here hates it, and I feel so lonely for that. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 24, 2015 6:16:34 GMT -5
1999 marked the end of the Oasis we all love - this was the band that got us on this forum. Maybe I'm too sentimentally attached to the 90s, but from there on in, it was mediocre albums with just a spattering of great tunes sadly. Your not saying Standing On The Shoulder of Giants was shit now, are you??? Don't diss that album man, its my personal favorite Oasis album, actually. And you'll probably kill me for saying this, but Put Yer Money Where Yer Mouth Is is in my top 5 on it. Literally, EVERYONE on here hates it, and I feel so lonely for that. I don't hate the song at all. To properly enjoy it it has to be played LOUD. The lyrics are meaningless and only serve the melody of the song but the groove, the loops and the riff are excellent and really serve to pick up the pace of the album after the meandering Who Feels Love? That fourth track could either have been Put Yer Money Where Yer Mouth Is or Full On but I don't see it as filler at all. |
|
|
|
Post by PollyWantsACracker on Apr 24, 2015 7:32:29 GMT -5
Your not saying Standing On The Shoulder of Giants was shit now, are you??? Don't diss that album man, its my personal favorite Oasis album, actually. And you'll probably kill me for saying this, but Put Yer Money Where Yer Mouth Is is in my top 5 on it. Literally, EVERYONE on here hates it, and I feel so lonely for that. I don't hate the song at all. To properly enjoy it it has to be played LOUD. The lyrics are meaningless and only serve the melody of the song but the groove, the loops and the riff are excellent and really serve to pick up the pace of the album after the meandering Who Feels Love? That fourth track could either have been Put Yer Money Where Yer Mouth Is or Full On but I don't see it as filler at all. Do you ever think there is a great guitar riff buried underneath all those keyboards on the song though? I keep thinking this song could have had much louder guitar. it would benefit from a bit of remixing. |
|
280981
Oasis Roadie
Posts: 210
|
Post by 280981 on Apr 24, 2015 9:26:24 GMT -5
2009 because they split up
|
|
|
|
Post by The-Ghost-Dancer on Apr 24, 2015 15:15:51 GMT -5
98 - 2000 we had members leave and the bside album which was amazing but if noel had kept all those songs off singles would of made a brilliant 4th lp from 98 - 2000 i thought they were in limbo which they were then they released SOTSOG my personal favourite lp by the band and im all over PYMWYMI like a rash its a top song
|
|
|
|
Post by oasisnz on Apr 24, 2015 18:05:41 GMT -5
2004. Liam's voice was dead, the Glastonbury performance was awful and the intial sessions for Don't Believe The Truth were abandoned because Noel didn't feel the material was good enough (it was shite).
|
|
|
|
Post by PollyWantsACracker on Apr 25, 2015 7:49:27 GMT -5
2004. Liam's voice was dead, the Glastonbury performance was awful and the intial sessions for Don't Believe The Truth were abandoned because Noel didn't feel the material was good enough (it was shite). Liam's vocals were already shot by 2002 actually. You can clearly tell on Heathen Chemistry. |
|
|
|
Post by ManofMisery on Apr 25, 2015 8:04:38 GMT -5
2006 Buenos Aires  |
|
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5