|
|
Post by songbirdsally on Sept 22, 2011 17:30:29 GMT -5
Too short, I need moooooore  |
|
|
|
Post by applebuttaz on Sept 22, 2011 17:35:22 GMT -5
it's different...but i can't make an ultimate decision yet.
|
|
|
|
Post by songbirdsally on Sept 22, 2011 17:44:45 GMT -5
the beginning reminds me of 'Fucking In The Bushes'
|
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Sept 22, 2011 17:46:03 GMT -5
Need more. Sounds like Gas Panic to me when the vocals kick in, though.
|
|
|
|
Post by gdforever on Sept 22, 2011 17:49:01 GMT -5
Can you imagine how MENTAL the board would have gotten if this is the first version we heard?
|
|
|
|
Post by Iliad ♣ on Sept 22, 2011 17:49:24 GMT -5
Love the sound, don't like the voice (so far of course, it's just two lines  ). Does this mean we get some of the songs twice? edit: do yourself a favour and skip my comment about the voice, it's nonsense, it's just two lines so I'll need to hear more of it |
|
|
|
Post by thedon on Sept 22, 2011 17:50:40 GMT -5
Sounds really good. Not sure what's going on here though, I thought the Amorphous Androgynous album was different songs? Saying that, there's no melodic similarity so it might just be the same lyric and nothing else.
|
|
|
|
Post by gdforever on Sept 22, 2011 17:51:10 GMT -5
Like the sound, don't llike the voice. Does this mean we get some of the songs twice? We are getting 3 HFB tracks rerecorded and 10 original tracks. Watch the yahoo videos in the press section. |
|
|
|
Post by thedon on Sept 22, 2011 17:51:29 GMT -5
the beginning reminds me of 'Fucking In The Bushes' Sounds more like Soldier On to me! |
|
|
|
Post by Iliad ♣ on Sept 22, 2011 17:52:26 GMT -5
Like the sound, don't llike the voice. Does this mean we get some of the songs twice? We are getting 3 HFB tracks rerecorded and 10 original tracks. Watch the yahoo videos in the press section. Thank you! |
|
|
|
Post by mememe26 on Sept 22, 2011 18:05:25 GMT -5
How did this snippet come about?
|
|
dion
Oasis Roadie
Posts: 362
|
Post by dion on Sept 22, 2011 18:08:25 GMT -5
I very much doubt this is legit, they wouldn't have managed to arse up spelling Amorphous Androgynous for a kick off.
|
|
|
|
Post by bluemagpie on Sept 22, 2011 18:27:01 GMT -5
^It wasn't posted officially, so that's not an issue.
I think this could be a completely different song with bits of IIHAG stuck in - that's what the AA were doing, yes?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 22, 2011 18:40:03 GMT -5
Thats more like it Noel! Where did this come from? B-side? I can imagine Gaz from the AA to have passed a few copies round being the free spirited hippy he is meaning there could be a leak...
|
|
|
|
Post by manualex on Sept 22, 2011 18:41:58 GMT -5
I... wont listen untill some say is fake or in the full released form |
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Sept 22, 2011 19:03:45 GMT -5
If it is a fake, kudos to whoever is responsible b/c it's would be a damn good fake. Note how Noel's vocals don't match the melody of the original. Thus someone simply didn't just overdub the studio version on to a psychedelic track.....
|
|
|
|
Post by gdforever on Sept 22, 2011 19:10:16 GMT -5
^It wasn't posted officially, so that's not an issue. I think this could be a completely different song with bits of IIHAG stuck in - that's what the AA were doing, yes? Noel said they were rerecorded not remixed |
|
dion
Oasis Roadie
Posts: 362
|
Post by dion on Sept 22, 2011 19:15:25 GMT -5
^It wasn't posted officially, so that's not an issue. Well the person who got the "leak" would have received a file called "IIHAG - Amorphous Androgynous version" or something similar, I can't see the person leaking it getting AA's name wrong and you'd have to be pretty daft to manage a transcription error when the files already named for you. |
|
|
|
Post by noelliamnoel on Sept 22, 2011 19:43:44 GMT -5
For you tech people, does software exist to fake vocals like this? In other words, can someone use the original Noel vocal and change the melody completely? It's like I'm 97% sure it's Noel singing, but there is just a sliver of doubt in my mind
|
|
|
|
Post by bluemagpie on Sept 22, 2011 19:54:23 GMT -5
^It wasn't posted officially, so that's not an issue. I think this could be a completely different song with bits of IIHAG stuck in - that's what the AA were doing, yes? Noel said they were rerecorded not remixed I thought he said they put elements of different songs together in ways he didn't expect. That can be done with rerecorded material as well as with the originals. All I'm saying is that we have a clip with very little to tie it to the original song, and given that it was (apparently) produced by the AA it could be something completely different. Lyrics can easily be taken out of context - after all, the RM demo has a line from STC in it. ^It wasn't posted officially, so that's not an issue. Well the person who got the "leak" would have received a file called "IIHAG - Amorphous Androgynous version" or something similar, I can't see the person leaking it getting AA's name wrong and you'd have to be pretty daft to manage a transcription error when the files already named for you. The file I got from mmario here (which I assume is the original) is named "iihagr" - there's no name there to misspell. And yes, I do realize that this undermines the Different Song Theory a bit, but you never know. |
|
|
|
Post by CFC2013 on Sept 22, 2011 20:58:15 GMT -5
I don't like this psychedelic stuff. Why Liam and Noel are so obsessed with it is beyond me.
|
|
|
|
Post by heathenchemistry02 on Sept 22, 2011 21:21:32 GMT -5
if this is real, based on the short clip I'm not liking it that much.
Probably because we know the other version of the song already. I'm down for a tripped out sound, but the other version all the way. It may be good once we hear the whole thing. It was a bit much, but although refreshingly different
|
|
|
|
Post by SunshineLullaby on Sept 22, 2011 21:29:13 GMT -5
I've always been a big believer in the "serve the song" production mantra. Meaning it's important to arrange and record the song in a way that highlights the strength of the song, not the production. This snippet sounds like the AA guys trying to impress each other in the studio.
The melody being completely changed is proof of this. The melody had to change to fit what they wanted to throw on the track when it should always be the other way around.
Whatever, it's a small snippet. Hopefully the songs on this album aren't all stifled.
|
|
|
|
Post by NYR on Sept 22, 2011 23:02:40 GMT -5
i like it a lot! it's absolutely kickass!
|
|
|
|
Post by GIMH on Sept 23, 2011 0:37:57 GMT -5
So after my 3rd listen, it reminds me a bit musically of something off Urban Hymns but I can't put my finger on what.
|
|
). Does this mean we get some of the songs twice?
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5