|
Post by webm@ster on Dec 17, 2010 11:34:53 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by barnafin95 on Dec 17, 2010 18:45:22 GMT -5
Love this band, disagree with Liam for once. Hope they actually do bring guitar music back, and some more similar bands follow in their wake. Still, they must be doing something right if Liam Gallagher's already passed opinion on them when they havent officially released anything
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 17, 2010 22:07:13 GMT -5
Liam is, generally, wrong about music. I haven't listened to them yet though.
|
|
|
Post by beadyeyeunofficial on Dec 18, 2010 8:26:25 GMT -5
Liam is, generally, wrong about music. I haven't listened to them yet though. Liam's the only fooker who knows that British music is on it's knees. Brother just Oasis-by-numbers.
|
|
|
Post by His Royal Noelness on Dec 18, 2010 9:37:54 GMT -5
I must give them a listen.
|
|
|
Post by barnafin95 on Dec 18, 2010 14:37:36 GMT -5
Closest thing to oasis in terms of attitude since, well, oasis imo.
|
|
|
Post by SunshineLullaby on Dec 18, 2010 15:38:07 GMT -5
^ The worst thing about Oasis was the attitude, so that does nothing for me.
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Dec 18, 2010 16:00:28 GMT -5
^ The worst thing about Oasis was the attitude, so that does nothing for me. No idea about the band in question, but I feel I need to comment on the above quote: The attitude is what makes Oasis work. The attitude gives the songs credence.
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Dec 18, 2010 16:08:07 GMT -5
Just listened to the two clips in that article. Absolutely nothing special. I kid you not, the first thought I had was "Is this a British Orson? " Also, the lyric: 'Love is a time machine' - come on, it's a bit early to start nicking lyrics from an album that was released in 2008 ffs.
|
|
|
Post by SunshineLullaby on Dec 18, 2010 21:06:31 GMT -5
^ The worst thing about Oasis was the attitude, so that does nothing for me. No idea about the band in question, but I feel I need to comment on the above quote: The attitude is what makes Oasis work. The attitude gives the songs credence. Absolutely not. You couldn't be more wrong. Noel's talent and Liam's voice (especially early on) gave the band its special quality. Them acting like children in interviews did not. Was it entertaining? Of course. I'd be a fucking liar if I said I didn't enjoy watching their interviews. But I think it hurt them in the long run. I know people who like them, but will focus on them being "dicks, gits, pricks, twats, etc." That's their words, not mine. So don't jump on me for it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 18, 2010 23:37:50 GMT -5
Liam is, generally, wrong about music. I haven't listened to them yet though. Liam's the only fooker who knows that British music is on it's knees. Brother just Oasis-by-numbers. Thats cos British music this year was rather shit. Liam still knows nothing about modern music; he never did and I doubt he ever will.
|
|
|
Post by mrjonboyd on Dec 20, 2010 8:12:20 GMT -5
Liams always good for a soundbite, but iwouldnt go by his musical barometer though!
I agree that the attitude does infact make Oasis, their cocksure swagger is a hallmark along with the anthems. However id say their arrogance is also why the music press and fans turned against them so quickly. Probably more specifically Liams fault for spitting venomous bile so often.
|
|
|
Post by matt on Dec 21, 2010 21:20:41 GMT -5
Liam is, generally, wrong about music. I haven't listened to them yet though. Liam's the only fooker who knows that British music is on it's knees. Brother just Oasis-by-numbers. Still here?
|
|
|
Post by Bring It On Dan on Dec 22, 2010 6:19:44 GMT -5
Just listened to the two clips in that article. Absolutely nothing special. I kid you not, the first thought I had was "Is this a British Orson? " This. Fucking rubbish. The second one is like a shit Come Together.
|
|
|
Post by The Morning Son on Dec 23, 2010 19:42:03 GMT -5
I don't like them. They've come out with an opinion but don't have the tunes to back it up like Oasis and will get nowhere near being as big.
The singer doesnt have that rock'n'rock voice. It almost like an indie band doing poor britpop covers.
Anybody see a bit of Blur in there?
|
|
|
Post by SunshineLullaby on Dec 23, 2010 21:45:01 GMT -5
^ I agree with all of that. Listened to the preview song. Very uninspiring and that attitude won't help win them fans.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 24, 2010 6:13:56 GMT -5
I'll give it to Liam on this one though, they're shit. American musicians do Britpop better now.
|
|
|
Post by mrjonboyd on Dec 27, 2010 9:08:29 GMT -5
American musicians do Britpop better now. Ha, like that, good quote!
|
|
|
Post by NYR on Dec 28, 2010 22:38:47 GMT -5
^ The worst thing about Oasis was the attitude, so that does nothing for me. No idea about the band in question, but I feel I need to comment on the above quote: The attitude is what makes Oasis work. The attitude gives the songs credence. i couldn't disagree more. the songs were what made oasis work. fuck the attitude, the clothes, the interviews and everything else. they'd be nothing without the songs.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 28, 2010 23:52:00 GMT -5
No idea about the band in question, but I feel I need to comment on the above quote: The attitude is what makes Oasis work. The attitude gives the songs credence. i couldn't disagree more. the songs were what made oasis work. fuck the attitude, the clothes, the interviews and everything else. they'd be nothing without the songs. Indeed. Where would Oasis be without the tunes? They'd be just like Brother.
|
|
|
Post by SunshineLullaby on Dec 29, 2010 0:48:04 GMT -5
^ Good to see there's some who agree with me on that.
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Dec 29, 2010 2:01:39 GMT -5
No idea about the band in question, but I feel I need to comment on the above quote: The attitude is what makes Oasis work. The attitude gives the songs credence. i couldn't disagree more. the songs were what made oasis work. fuck the attitude, the clothes, the interviews and everything else. they'd be nothing without the songs. The attitude complemented the songs. You need both in the case of Oasis. Without the attitude, Oasis would have simply been a pop band - churning out tunes just for the sake of making quick profits. Instead, Noel believed in the songs he was writing, and Liam in the songs he was sneering. It added authenticity to the band. And it helped weave themselves and their songs into the fabric of society. People could identify with their tunes because they were singing about them and because they were singing about early versions of themselves. Essentially, Noel's early work was all about escapism, youth, and trying to make a better life for himself and coincided with themes that the average youth could embrace. Without the attitude and the resulting belief, the songs would have just been words set to music. However, with the attitude the Gallagher's were able to bring to life those tracks, and the two - attitude and quality songs - worked in tandem to ignite the global passion and phenomenon that Oasis were able to become.
|
|
|
Post by NYR on Dec 29, 2010 4:11:08 GMT -5
a few things... -the attitude may have complemented the songs, but you could have said that about any rock and roll band. -"fabric of society," "global passion and phenomenon..." jesus christ, man-- you write this with one hand? you're writing like they both died in a plane crash. -you said it yourself, noel believed in the songs he was writing. that's not attitude. that's called believing in oneself.
this is pretty much "wibbling rivalry." sure, noel had some attitude. i would if i wrote songs like "live forever." but let's be serious, man. this band may have had its fights and quotes, but we're all here because of one thing: the music.
|
|
|
Post by SunshineLullaby on Dec 29, 2010 11:34:34 GMT -5
Yeah, I agree with the above. I'm a songwriter and I believe in what I create, but if you don't you might as well give up. Even if a musician is known as being humble, I can guarantee he still knew that he was better than his peers and he was going to make a living making music. But the "attitude", as we've taken to calling it, went beyond self-belief. It was more in your face. Some people loved it, some hated it. But it has nothing to do with my enjoyment of Oasis. Without the tunes they're just every shitty rapper putting himself in his own Top 10 Dead Or Alive list.
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Jan 8, 2011 20:21:04 GMT -5
No idea about the band in question, but I feel I need to comment on the above quote: The attitude is what makes Oasis work. The attitude gives the songs credence. i couldn't disagree more. the songs were what made oasis work. fuck the attitude, the clothes, the interviews and everything else. they'd be nothing without the songs. This isn't only addressed to you, but to others who hold the same opinion - and should very well be a new thread, tbh.... "You have to have that attitude to play those songs, otherwise it just wouldn't have been believable. Y'know, I think one goes with the other." Gem circa 2004 Gem is spot on.
|
|