|
|
Post by SOULDIGGER on Dec 6, 2010 7:27:00 GMT -5
Its a song title. Who fucking cares. These guys love those 2 bands and they also have made it clear thru the years that they really don't give a shit what anyone thinks or says, especially some of you who have a Hard on for bashing a "song title" already. They should write a song about some of you "lot" and call it "whiners and complainers". Cheers
|
|
|
|
Post by LlAM on Dec 6, 2010 7:27:45 GMT -5
fUCK OFF WILL YOU
|
|
|
|
Post by BEng on Dec 6, 2010 7:40:06 GMT -5
You just managed to write the whole sentence in capital letters, except the one that really needs to be capitalised...  Got to agree with SOULDIGGER here, of course it's a stupid song name, but what does it matter? I kinda respect them to release a song they know people will complaint about. As long as the music is decent, they can name it whatever they want. |
|
|
|
Post by tomlivesforever on Dec 6, 2010 7:54:21 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by oneeye on Dec 6, 2010 7:55:27 GMT -5
I agree with SOULDIGGER.
Far too much complaining - the critics will judge it when they hear the song
|
|
|
|
Post by LlAM on Dec 6, 2010 8:04:13 GMT -5
|
|
copie
Oasis Roadie
Posts: 239
|
Post by copie on Dec 6, 2010 8:08:31 GMT -5
I think it's some kind of ruse to avoid the album leaking...
Like "Star Wars" being called "Blue Harvest"
I mean it has to be. The title, the song names, the ARTWORK... so so horrid.
|
|
|
|
Post by wonderplan on Dec 6, 2010 8:20:22 GMT -5
it's rock n' roll not rocket science
|
|
|
|
Post by oneeye on Dec 6, 2010 8:23:29 GMT -5
I think it's some kind of ruse to avoid the album leaking... Like "Star Wars" being called "Blue Harvest" I mean it has to be. The title, the song names, the ARTWORK... so so horrid. is it new material? Yes! Have you heard the album? No! Just wait .................. |
|
|
|
Post by Frank Lee Vulgar on Dec 6, 2010 8:29:47 GMT -5
I think it's some kind of ruse to avoid the album leaking... Like "Star Wars" being called "Blue Harvest" I mean it has to be. The title, the song names, the ARTWORK... so so horrid. I wouldn't even be too surprised if that was true, considering what BDI have done so far. |
|
|
|
Post by BEng on Dec 6, 2010 9:57:10 GMT -5
Glad to see your Caps Lock key is fixed. Seriously, that comment was worth complaining. I don't mind the album cover/title and song titles. Even more excited for the album and to see them live!  |
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Dec 6, 2010 11:48:38 GMT -5
Happy has returned! I love these threads now and again, I needed a good laugh |
|
|
|
Post by Bring It On Dan on Dec 6, 2010 13:10:57 GMT -5
I love the title.
|
|
|
|
Post by worldsoutro on Dec 6, 2010 13:13:01 GMT -5
This has to be a joke tracklist
|
|
|
|
Post by SOULDIGGER on Dec 6, 2010 13:55:57 GMT -5
Why? What's so funny about the tracklist? Other than "wigwam" I don't see a problem.
|
|
|
|
Post by gdforever on Dec 6, 2010 14:05:25 GMT -5
Oh common. Beatles and Stones is a title waiting to be picked on. lol. @ least this means that the album isn't gonna be stuck in the fifties like BTL.
I don't think that any of us, that aren't morons, are writing off any songs because of their titles.
Also...personally I think Wigwam is more worthy of ridicule as a title. Beatles and Stones is just a bit cringeworthy that's all.
|
|
|
|
Post by beadyeyeunofficial on Dec 6, 2010 14:57:51 GMT -5
Oh common. Beatles and Stones is a title waiting to be picked on. lol. @ least this means that the album isn't gonna be stuck in the fifties like BTL. I don't think that any of us, that aren't morons, are writing off any songs because of their titles. Also...personally I think Wigwam is more worthy of ridicule as a title. Beatles and Stones is just a bit cringeworthy that's all. You're right, it'll probably be stuck in the '60s. |
|
|
|
Post by dj on Dec 6, 2010 15:25:55 GMT -5
I don't care what the titles are as long as the songs are good & I like them. Beatles & Stones just sounds like a working title for maybe how the song will sound or was inspired by that never got changed. As for people knocking BDI for the that title they were going to knock them anyway...
|
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Dec 6, 2010 16:08:55 GMT -5
Remember Noel on the DM DVD: "Before I joined the band, Liam had one song, get this, it was called 'Acoustic'....The vision, let me tell you" |
|
|
|
Post by stinenat on Dec 6, 2010 16:58:29 GMT -5
I think wigwam is a badass title for a psychedelic rock song. It's the only imaginative title on there. That said, titles don't mean shit. I didn't like the album title until I saw the artwork. It's badass. So indie feeling.
|
|
|
|
Post by supersonic8587 on Dec 6, 2010 20:38:20 GMT -5
Remember Noel on the DM DVD: "Before I joined the band, Liam had one song, get this, it was called 'Acoustic'....The vision, let me tell you" Haha. At least he's made some progress. |
|
|
|
Post by mkoasis on Dec 7, 2010 0:54:50 GMT -5
I think wigwam is a badass title for a psychedelic rock song. It's the only imaginative title on there. That said, titles don't mean shit. I didn't like the album title until I saw the artwork. It's badass. So indie feeling. I agree. I'm betting Wigwam will be a groovy, bass-heavy instrumental. I love the title. Heck, its my favourite song on the album already. I've decided. I also like that they called the track Beatles & Stones. They know ppl will take the piss but they don't care. This is another I'm really looking forward to hearing. Some of the titles are really..well, not that cool. But I'm still excited for the album. Nice title, crap artwork. I love the BTL cover, that was brilliant. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Dec 7, 2010 7:23:52 GMT -5
I love all the people who pop up to defend things that are clearly shit, lol.
Beatles and Stones?
Are you fucking serious.
|
|
|
|
Post by psj3809 on Dec 7, 2010 8:49:08 GMT -5
I love the way people turn up just to moan about the name of a song ! Its like we're all 14 year old take that fans or something going OTT the second we hear any news, its embarassing.
Yeah 'hindu times', 'columbia' were cracking names werent they !
They can call it whatever they want as long as the tunes half decent. Jesus i wish it was feb so the album would come out so we could stop all this ridiculous OTT stuff !
|
|
|
|
Post by SunshineLullaby on Dec 7, 2010 11:09:27 GMT -5
^ There's no comparison between The Hindu Times and Columbia (both great song names, by the way) and the atrocity that is Beatles and Stones. There's seriously no reason to name a song such an asinine name. Why would BDI do that? Do they think we don't know they're influenced by them. It'd be like the Brian Jonestown Massacre writing a song called We Like The Rolling Stones. Goes without saying, doesn't it?
|
|
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5