|
|
Post by blacksheep on Oct 2, 2008 6:16:46 GMT -5
Another album...another shitty RS review.
By all accounts, this is a better album than DBTT, yet they gave DBTT 3.5 stars and DOYS 2.5
In typical fashion the review rips the band and doesn't even talk about the songs.
What do they want? Oasis make rock music, no more no less.
Go wank it to Myley Cyrus and the Jonas brothers a bit more!
Oh ya, I fully expected this.
|
|
liamscoat
Oasis Roadie
..would Jesus Christ have been a fucking pervert if he had a crisp packet on his head.Who knows?
Posts: 334
|
Post by liamscoat on Oct 2, 2008 7:25:33 GMT -5
Who cares, loads are giving the band a backlash after what many see as a return to form on DBTT...........but this album is a Massive step forward to that.......to give it 2.5 is madness the first five songs alone are worth that!!!  |
|
|
|
Post by start at the end on Oct 2, 2008 7:57:33 GMT -5
Wow, 2 1/2? Just for kicks, Jessica Simson and Paris HIlton both got 3.
wow. just.....wow.
|
|
|
|
Post by LlAM on Oct 2, 2008 8:07:01 GMT -5
Wow, 2 1/2? Just for kicks, Jessica Simson and Paris HIlton both got 3. wow. just.....wow. Hahaha Paris Hilton is clearly a better artist than everyone involved in Oasis combined x2  |
|
|
|
Post by caats19 on Oct 2, 2008 8:08:21 GMT -5
anybody else add their own review?
|
|
gem909
Oasis Roadie
Posts: 101
|
Post by gem909 on Oct 2, 2008 8:08:22 GMT -5
rolling stone is no longer a relevant music magazine it covers pop culture and politics and is only into whats hip at the moment or selling loads of records , plus they have always hated oasis the only time they covered oasis with any kinda normal coverage was around 95-96 and thats when they where the new big thing , thats all they are into whats hot at the moment
|
|
|
|
Post by start at the end on Oct 2, 2008 8:21:41 GMT -5
rolling stone is no longer a relevant music magazine it covers pop culture and politics and is only into whats hip at the moment or selling loads of records , plus they have always hated oasis the only time they covered oasis with any kinda normal coverage was around 95-96 and thats when they where the new big thing , thats all they are into whats hot at the moment All too true, but for some reason, I've always wanted them to just rebound with one 4 star review for the band. I really thought it was going to be DBTT...and that received one of the most back-handed 3 1/2 star reviews I've ever read. Interestingly enough, I think this 2 1/2 star affair finally ended that near obsession. Simply a ridiculous "critique" by any reasonable measure. |
|
gem909
Oasis Roadie
Posts: 101
|
Post by gem909 on Oct 2, 2008 9:10:32 GMT -5
when idiots like jessica simpson are getting 3 stars for her turd fest of a record and artist like the jonas brothers are on the cover , and fucking the idiot cast of the hills is on the cover ,, i mean really the whole fucking staff over there should be fucking fired for being so totally uncool ,, there heads have been up there own asses for so long they dont even know what\ good music is anymore
|
|
|
|
Post by dearprudence on Oct 2, 2008 9:13:14 GMT -5
Rolling Stone slammed Led Zeppelin their entire career and now go search that fucking top 500 album list and how now suck up to them... their a fucking rubbish magazine anyway
|
|
gem909
Oasis Roadie
Posts: 101
|
Post by gem909 on Oct 2, 2008 9:17:11 GMT -5
that magazine thinks its more important than the music ,, thats why i hate , the same reason mtv sucks mass balls they dont play fucking videos anymore is the same reason rolling stone blows my ass its an honor to get such a terrible review from that shit magazine i wish they would have given it zero stars the free press of that would have shifted another hundred thousand copies
|
|
ozfan2
Oasis Roadie
Posts: 307
|
Post by ozfan2 on Oct 2, 2008 9:30:57 GMT -5
Post some comments on the RS comment section. Sorry but what did oasis do to RS??? Their credibility has been exposed.
I wish their was a way to blockade a website or something.
I will never go to RS again. that is a promise.
DOYS is a abrilliant album and for them to dismiss it like that shows that they have a deep seated hatred for oasis.
Karma..
|
|
gem909
Oasis Roadie
Posts: 101
|
Post by gem909 on Oct 2, 2008 9:41:01 GMT -5
there to busy sniffing miley cirus s panties and jerking of the jonas brothers to give it a proper listen man
|
|
|
|
Post by njoasisnyc on Oct 2, 2008 11:29:41 GMT -5
whats the link to this review?
|
|
|
|
Post by NoelandMeMay29 on Oct 2, 2008 12:21:53 GMT -5
Unless this review was a 4-5 star review, this album was not going to make people that don't buy Oasis cd's buy it.
I'm more please that the NME (Oasis's own country magazine) gave it an 8/10.
This album is a 3.5-4, so RS is off a full star but w/ so many reviews out there now and all being personal opinions, I'm not sure why we care.
If DM & MG never existed I think all of their albums would get at least a half star more but those 2 first albums were so mega everything gets compared.
When Billboard comes out we'll see what they say.
|
|
|
|
Post by njoasisnyc on Oct 2, 2008 12:49:42 GMT -5
i agree every album they released has been a great album by anyones standard WITHOUT dm and mg looming in the background.. when you made 2 classic albums like that and were haled to replace the beatles, you are gonna pay for it later on.
|
|
|
|
Post by webm@ster on Oct 2, 2008 13:18:35 GMT -5
can some one confirm that there is a print article review which gives them 2 and a half stars for the album and not for TSOTL single ?
thanks
|
|
|
|
Post by caats19 on Oct 2, 2008 13:22:55 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by webm@ster on Oct 2, 2008 14:41:03 GMT -5
thanks , pathetic writing btw , why does it say posted on October 16th 2008 under the article ? |
|
|
|
Post by eva on Oct 2, 2008 14:46:00 GMT -5
just to confirm they're morons
|
|
|
|
Post by webm@ster on Oct 2, 2008 15:08:16 GMT -5
|
|
gem909
Oasis Roadie
Posts: 101
|
Post by gem909 on Oct 2, 2008 15:14:47 GMT -5
so they them slag for the beatles thing then compliment them for outta time a song that has a sample of a lennon interview in the song this confirms it for me they have no clue at all and dislike this band for the sake of it i mean how do you rip them for there love of the beatles then praise the song that has lennon on it
|
|
|
|
Post by eyeballtickler23 on Oct 2, 2008 15:51:54 GMT -5
Poorly written, badly researched, layered with the cliches that come with every Oasis review (ex: "Beatles rip offs"). I can't take this review seriously enough to be bothered by it.
|
|
|
|
Post by calioasis on Oct 2, 2008 15:58:38 GMT -5
Sad but true is that American geek music reviewers don't like Oasis perceived attitude and they can't get past it. They've never gotten the humor and fun in the bands cocky attitude. Which is weird because they give the most entertaining interviews around. Have you tried to read an interview with Coldplay? My god I can't even get through them, so boring. The bed wetting music geeks have no sense of humor. Oasis is one of the few bands that tries to keep a sense of rock and roll star. They speak big and they never, ever, say anything woe is me. That's part of the fun.
Also, Considering the place rock music is in right now you'd think people would rejoice when Oasis released a real rock n roll record. And objectively this record is at LEAST a 3.5 our of 5.
Of course i haven't read Rolling Stone in forever (who has?). Jonas Brothers on the cover?! Please. It's still bizarre though, I really don't get it.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheEXPERIENCE on Oct 2, 2008 15:59:43 GMT -5
Hilarious. GENERIC?  ? It's funny they get on them for not abandoning the old stuff, yet they do something new but it's STILLLLL fucking generic!? They are so in love with Radiohead its mind boggling. Hope that whole magazine goes under |
|
|
|
Post by caats19 on Oct 2, 2008 17:16:37 GMT -5
haha they gave the killer's sam's town 2/5 stars cause they left behind that 80's music for some americana rock n roll. sadly they went back to the 80's on the new single.
|
|
? It's funny they get on them for not abandoning the old stuff, yet they do something new but it's STILLLLL fucking generic!?
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5