|
Post by webm@ster on Jul 21, 2003 14:51:28 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by shadowboxer on Jul 21, 2003 19:47:05 GMT -5
I definitely think stars need them, especially to stay in the headlines and that is what makes or breaks most of their careers. I will say that most can go over the limit and although they say that they are just "doing their jobs", i think it is a bit much. To not even be able to go to the grocery store without a flash in your face would suck!
( I 'm just glad no one has a huge telephoto lens and is trying to catch me in my towel or naked. Well no one is now that Mape is away.) ;D
|
|
|
Post by daysleeper on Jul 21, 2003 20:35:03 GMT -5
yeah i agree with SB. they are over the top but the stars need them and a lot actually encourage them.
they can't have the press exposure and total privacy. but some privacy is essential
i always think of Tom Hanks when people talk about the paparazzi. One of the world's biggest stars, but when was the last time you saw a private photo of him, or his kids? he doesn't encourage the press and he doesn't get hassled by them. a lot of other celebs do
|
|
|
Post by Rain on Jul 21, 2003 22:55:54 GMT -5
Photographers follow shadow all the time or is that DS ;D ;D ;D
|
|
NoelyG
Oasis Roadie
Posts: 434
|
Post by NoelyG on Aug 9, 2003 12:26:27 GMT -5
Defenetly an intrusion of privacy. Who gives a shit about Tara Plamer Tompkinson , Jordan or Jade from big brother. There are talent people living on the streets and these guys are loaded just for being famous scabs.
|
|