|
|
Post by mattmightsay on Jul 4, 2003 20:51:10 GMT -5
idea from oasis-ultimate  |
|
|
|
Post by Rain on Jul 6, 2003 6:31:02 GMT -5
I like them to do a collaboration album with other artist.
|
|
|
|
Post by chocolate st*rfish on Jul 6, 2003 8:12:00 GMT -5
why not?
the white album is one of the best i can fuckin remember!
|
|
|
|
Post by kandaii on Jul 7, 2003 0:56:23 GMT -5
yeh, they're making us wait long enough for the next album so I say they should
|
|
NoelyG
Oasis Roadie
Posts: 434
|
Post by NoelyG on Jul 7, 2003 6:35:53 GMT -5
God yeah, if they can do it and it wont take long
|
|
DefinitelyMaybe
RKid
You're the outcast - you're the underclass / But you don't care - because you're living fast
Posts: 17
|
Post by DefinitelyMaybe on Aug 23, 2003 19:43:46 GMT -5
I would love it! If they have enough good songs for it, well they can go ahead and do it!
|
|
|
|
Post by maketradefair on Sept 23, 2003 12:52:31 GMT -5
no, i wouldnt like to see them do it, cos it means if they have say 2 albums worth of songs on the one album they would only have one tour for it. were as if they realised 2 albums, they would tour twice.. i really dindt explain that well.. but i hope you know what im getting at!..   |
|
|
|
Post by chocolate st*rfish on Sept 23, 2003 13:26:14 GMT -5
were as if they realised 2 albums, they would tour twice.. think we got yer point  |
|
|
|
Post by daysleeper on Sept 23, 2003 13:59:00 GMT -5
it all depends on the quality of the material. theres no point in releasing a 30 track double album if half the songs aren't up to scratch. if they have the material or a concept behind the album (a la Floyd) then it would be worth doing
personally i can't see it. and why bother really? just release one album one year and another the next. it used to be that bands released albums whenever they wanted - now it seems like bands can only release one album every 2/3 years.
|
|
|
|
Post by mape on Sept 23, 2003 20:49:54 GMT -5
No.
i don't think its the right thing to do these days. I just don't think its worth it. If the overall album is bad, then the few good songs will go unnoticed and will go to waste. Also, if the songs are good, then spread it over two albums. It just means more money, more publicity and more touring.
Also, the price would probably be higher, and that means that most of the north american market wouldn't touch it.
|
|
|
|
Post by mattmightsay on Sept 26, 2003 0:48:28 GMT -5
a big fuckin yes
|
|
|
|
Post by NoelsGirlie on Sept 27, 2003 14:32:47 GMT -5
I like them to do a collaboration album with other artist. nah i think they r much beter by themselves!!! |
|
|
|
Post by Toast960 on Oct 15, 2003 15:33:03 GMT -5
I think they should do what Metallica and Guns n' Roses did and just release a double album as two separate albums. Like the "Use Your Illusion" albums and "Load" and "Re-Load". They should record two albums worth of material and either release it together (if the record all the songs within the due date of the album) or just release one album and work on the next album and then tour after the second one is released.
|
|
|
|
Post by mîcCỵOrRIe on Oct 18, 2003 0:15:35 GMT -5
im up for it
|
|
|
|
Post by Columbia on Oct 27, 2003 9:00:06 GMT -5
na noel's too lazy. he says it gonna be till 2005 till the new one comes out and that is gonna just be a standard album. if there's double the tracks it'll be 2007 and i dunno about u lot but i cant wait that long!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by mîcCỵOrRIe on Oct 30, 2003 1:12:16 GMT -5
i wish he'd hurry up cuz we cant stand the wait
|
|
|
|
Post by Tomo on Nov 5, 2003 16:40:49 GMT -5
How about a new album with 1 cd being the new tunes and the second, a dvd with a documentry on it and extra stuff. I would probably forgive the band if they gave us that. I would definately wait (probably because we aint got a choice) till 2005.
|
|
|
|
Post by chocolate st*rfish on Nov 5, 2003 16:56:56 GMT -5
a very cool idea but you know that oasis is not the kind of band that sells gimmicks along with its albums.
|
|
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5