|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on May 24, 2020 12:04:45 GMT -5
A simple yes or no binary vote. It’s of course more complex than that as everyone will define ‘hype’ and ‘success’ here differently which will be interesting, hence the thread.
While there’s no doubt that they established themselves as one of the biggest names in rock at the end of the last decade, but the hype starting around 2005? No, they never lived up to that. Perhaps they never wanted to - but I never believe that kind of deflection. But anyway, I vote NO.
|
|
|
Post by oasisserbia on May 24, 2020 15:42:52 GMT -5
I am 100% sure that we already have the same thread.
|
|
|
Post by fabulousbakers on May 24, 2020 17:49:23 GMT -5
I am 100% sure that we already have the sam thread. We do - but Sam was a stupid name for a band. Anyway, Sam didn't live up to their hype either.
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on May 24, 2020 20:38:25 GMT -5
I am 100% sure that we already have the sam thread. We do - but Sam was a stupid name for a band. Anyway, Sam didn't live up to their hype either. lol wtf
|
|
|
Post by yeayeayeah on May 26, 2020 0:29:41 GMT -5
For me they did. I far more enjoy their later work. I was never really a huge fan of their early indie stuff.
|
|
|
Post by oasisserbia on May 26, 2020 11:12:42 GMT -5
If your last album is your best, after 15 years long career, then answer is yes. They did.
|
|
|
Post by oasisserbia on May 26, 2020 11:27:05 GMT -5
Are ''Best of ..." albums no longer a thing? I can't remember seeing "Best of" or "Greatest hits" albums by any "new" band.
How would "Best of Arctic Monkeys" look like? They can make really strong album.
|
|
|
Post by tiger40 on Sept 6, 2020 13:42:51 GMT -5
It's no from me I'm afraid. I've never really been a fan of them.
|
|