that wording is far too broad. You endanger people's lives just by playing the sport in a lot of sports. Perhaps intentional behaviour that is against the rules - I guess so - that makes sense.

yeah, that's what I said - you endanger people's lives just by playing the sport in many sports but perhaps behaviour that is against the rules in a sport and that you do deliberately (how it would be proven I don't know). Like if you're playing hockey and you swing the stick over your head and hit the player as hard as you can on the skull like happened to that guy who was the first guy to wear a helmet. It's really hard to determine where the line is between a minor foul and a deliberate attempt to endanger someone's life in already dangerous psorts like hockey, rugby, etc - but maybe in like volleyball it's obvious - but then again that kind of thing wouldn't happen in volleyball

I guess not. Does it say "any player who intentionally endanger's someone's life" is kicked out?

Even if it does say this - this does not change the fact that as a matter of fact by playing rugby you are endangering someone's life - not as much as say throwoing knives at them and a great deal more than by polikng them - its' a scale like most htings but anyway, what od you mean?

i mean, in marty mcsorley's case, yes, they should. to refresh your memory...
s40.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=14OST2NAI2O3R2ZIY5ZQ5YVK3F

or this one... todd bertuzzi of the vancouver canucks
s40.yousendit.com/d.aspx?id=3TN7MCYYO6Q2I1XYIV0WAEZNT8

shadow honey the really sad thing is the arena pr people will probly use it to hype up that shite game++