|
|
Post by shadowboxer on Sept 14, 2003 2:28:18 GMT -5
CRAP! Mosley beating De la Hoya...  I think the judges must have been watching a different fight. My boy got tired, but he was clearly landing more punches.  Fixed it was!! |
|
|
|
Post by boxersshadow on Sept 14, 2003 11:45:48 GMT -5
 golden boy get's a shoe shine........ LAS VEGAS (AP) -- -- Sugar Shane Mosley was even sweeter the second time around.Mosley came on in the late rounds again Saturday night to beat Oscar De La Hoya for the second time in three years, winning a close but unanimous decision to take the WBC and WBA 154-pound (69.3-kilogram) titles. In a fight almost as close as the first one, Mosley was the busier and faster fighter, beating De La Hoya to the punch and staying away from the left hook that De La Hoya used to knock out his last two opponents |
|
|
|
Post by mape on Sept 14, 2003 12:11:07 GMT -5
hmm from what i read in the fish-wrap today, mosley took over in the later few rounds. its always the last few rounds that judges base their decisions on.
i'm sorry, but i think its time for your boy to hang up his gloves. ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by shadowboxer on Sept 14, 2003 16:15:42 GMT -5
golden boy get's a shoe shine........ LAS VEGAS (AP) -- -- Sugar Shane Mosley was even sweeter the second time around.Mosley came on in the late rounds again Saturday night to beat Oscar De La Hoya for the second time in three years, winning a close but unanimous decision to take the WBC and WBA 154-pound (69.3-kilogram) titles. In a fight almost as close as the first one, Mosley was the busier and faster fighter, beating De La Hoya to the punch and staying away from the left hook that De La Hoya used to knock out his last two opponents THis has Webby written all over it....hmmmm guest my ass!  |
|
|
|
Post by mape on Sept 14, 2003 20:44:17 GMT -5
he's taking legal action i think.
and as for our guest, i don't think webby was smart enough to pull it off on his own. it was a collaboration with that other guy, what's his name? dayslipper or something
|
|
|
|
Post by daysleeper on Sept 14, 2003 21:03:35 GMT -5
hehe - no i think this is soley the work of the deranged webhamster  i never even realised guests were allowed to post in this forum  |
|
|
|
Post by mape on Sept 14, 2003 21:12:31 GMT -5
hmmm... maybe you're rite after all. now that i think about it, that webhamster is always up to no good. must put him back in that plastic ball again
|
|
|
|
Post by shadowboxer on Sept 14, 2003 21:43:55 GMT -5
hmmm... maybe you're rite after all. now that i think about it, that webhamster is always up to no good. must put him back in that plastic ball again Yes, the plastic ball and see how he fairs after I throw him down a flight of stairs. ;D |
|
|
|
Post by mape on Jan 9, 2004 21:32:10 GMT -5
The FBI raided the Las Vegas offices of Bob Arum Tuesday night, apparently as part of an investigation into the boxing promoter's business practices, and the New York Daily News reported Friday that those practices could include fixing the disputed Oscar De La Hoya-Sugar Shane Mosley II fight.
According to the Daily News, the 20-month investigation also involves New York City police and includes allegations that Top Rank, Arum's company, and some of its fighters schemed to throw fights.
The newspaper reports that law enforcement sources indicate that evidence has been found suggesting that the De La Hoya-Mosley fight in September may have been rigged. Mosley won a unanimous decision but De La Hoya cried foul, demanding an investigation into the three judges' scorecards.
The rigging apparently would involve tampering with the scales to allow boxers of different weight classes to fight each other, according to the paper, and the forging of medical documents.
In this case, De La Hoya, a Top Rank fighter, would have actually been heavier than announced and had a weight advantage that was supposed to translate into a victory and a lucrative third match with Mosley. Nevertheless, a third match is still likely.
Meanwhile, according to Friday's Los Angeles Times, none of the key figures in that match has been questioned.
|
|
Fixed it was!!
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5