|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Nov 26, 2016 0:59:58 GMT -5
Former Cuban leader Fidel Castro dies at age 90, state TV says.
|
|
|
Post by mimmihopps on Nov 26, 2016 4:33:43 GMT -5
Just read about it. I hope what he and Obama reached, will continue.
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Nov 26, 2016 13:20:37 GMT -5
Wish I owned some land in Cuba. Gonna become the new Vegas. Mo money!!!
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Nov 26, 2016 13:22:26 GMT -5
As an anarchist-socialist. very mixed feeling about this guy - I can only hope that the good things he stood for will continue to exist the Cuban consciousness. Good things he stood for? He oppressed his people for over 50 years and at one point worked with the Russians to bring down America with nuclear missiles.. Not cool. Not cool. Only one way to feel about this guy..............relieved. Especially if you are Cuban.
|
|
|
Post by The Escapist on Nov 26, 2016 13:24:59 GMT -5
As an anarchist-socialist. very mixed feeling about this guy - I can only hope that the good things he stood for will continue to exist the Cuban consciousness. Good things he stood for? He oppressed his people for over 50 years and at one point worked with the Russians to bring down America with nuclear missiles.. Not cool. Not cool. Only one way to feel about this guy..............relived. Especially if you are Cuban. Yeah, having read about him today he seems a pretty Leninist kind of psychopath. As you say, not cool.
|
|
|
Post by matt on Nov 26, 2016 13:33:56 GMT -5
A tyrant, a murderer and a thief.
Good riddance.
|
|
|
Post by spaneli on Nov 26, 2016 16:13:01 GMT -5
I studied Castro a bit, and took a class in US foreign relations in regard to Latin America.
Castro was interesting to say the least. He came to power because of legitimate grievances. He remained in power through illegitimate means.
The grievances: The want for America to get out of his country. This was legitimate. The US were as bad in their treatment of Latin Americans as Castro ever was during his lifetime. The want for the US to mind their own business economically and not tamper with other governments by causing coups and overthrows, was legitimate and felt by every Latin and central American country. For better or for worse, Castro is a hero to many because of this stance and through his unflinching ability to hold off the most powerful country in the world.
The illegitimate means: Castro never really recovered from the bay of pigs. It very much poisoned the waters and made him less trusting of the Cuban people. Honestly, to say that Castro brought the US on the brink of nuclear war is an oversimplification. The US did that on their own through stationing nuclear weapons near the border of Russia. Russia only returned the favor and Cuba helped. Still, these things, and the psychopathic paranoia of Castro, led to an amazingly oppressive regime, which there was really no excuse for. Castro, in his want to continue the revolution, never trusted anyone else but himself to carry on, even his own people. Ironically, he may be proven right. His brother has already thawed tensions with the US, and Obama will be shown to be very much ahead of the game by normalizing relations with a brand new market that can be tapped into for US gain. Future American presidents will reap the benefits that Obama sowed.
Cuba has universal health care, amazing research facilities, and universal literacy, but Castro negated all of those benefits through repression. He is a mixed bag of a legacy. Extremely mixed. Just like his revolution, complicated in many ways.
|
|
|
Post by spaneli on Nov 26, 2016 16:31:16 GMT -5
As an anarchist-socialist. very mixed feeling about this guy - I can only hope that the good things he stood for will continue to exist the Cuban consciousness. Good things he stood for? He oppressed his people for over 50 years and at one point worked with the Russians to bring down America with nuclear missiles.. Not cool. Not cool. Only one way to feel about this guy..............relieved. Especially if you are Cuban. This isn't a completely outlandish statement. I mean, it is, but there are other people who believe this. Trudeau just called Castro an amazing leader. Bernie Sanders has been known as a big supporter of Castro. Comments, he had to back away from during the primary debates.
|
|
|
Post by Manualex on Nov 26, 2016 17:11:05 GMT -5
Fidel promised elections shortly after taking over Cuba, they are still waiting. Not sad not happy about his passing. He wasn't even relevant anymore for politics in his country just a figurehead. Hate that my country will grieve his passing.
|
|
|
Post by matt on Nov 26, 2016 23:13:59 GMT -5
Quote from a Cuban.
"At least this means that as a Cuban-American socialist, I will soon no longer have to put up with my ignorant comrades praising the name of this brutal dictator. A true socialist doesn't butcher thousands of his own people, he protects them. A true socialist doesn't implement arbitrary food rations to starve his people, he feeds them. A true socialist doesn't make his people equal in poverty, he makes them equal in prosperity. Good riddance, Fidel. You may not have been an imperialist stooge, but you ruined my family's country just the same."
For all 'achievements', they're not unique to revolutionary socialism. But hey, he hated America, so according to the Twittersphere, that makes him a good 'un.
The problem with this debate is that a large proportion on the left hold him up as a revered figure, a hero, an icon, a saint. Yet these are the same people calling Tony Blair a tyrant. Instead, how about the hard left lionise figures of real achievement? For example, Clement Attlee - I know the hard left may have to swallow their pride (that isn't going to happen) and shift themselves a bit more to the centre to recognise his achievements, but as far as I'm concerned, his legacy continues to make a tangible impact to my life and everyone else in the UK more than any idealistic revolutionary radicalism could ever do. He made it possible to show that significant change could be achieved within the paradigm he and everyone else was confined in. A lesson that it should be evolution we want, not revolution.
The left's astounding hypocrisy knows no bounds. Meanwhile we have Republicans on the right going on about Castro's firing squads, torture and repression - despite the same folk supporting the propping up of facist regimes. Is it any wonder why most people despise politics - there is a severe lack of morals on both sides, and as far as I'm concerned, they're both as bad as each other.
|
|
|
Post by Elie De Beaufour 🐴 on Nov 27, 2016 1:57:04 GMT -5
True story: When Ortiega was in power in Nicuragua, my aut's brother was amongst the ones who were killed because of Castro's bed politics with Nicuragua.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 27, 2016 7:30:15 GMT -5
Great man, great leader. R.I.P.
But of course people hate him because of Yankee propaganda. You should remember that even Nelson Mandela admired him and had a big respect for Castro.
|
|
|
Post by tomlivesforever on Nov 27, 2016 7:46:48 GMT -5
A tyrant, a murderer and a thief. Good riddance. Reductive to the point of stupidity. Castro like most people is more complicated than that. Here's someone with some expertise being a bit more balanced about he whole thing.
|
|
|
Post by matt on Nov 27, 2016 8:31:27 GMT -5
A tyrant, a murderer and a thief. Good riddance. Reductive to the point of stupidity. Castro like most people is more complicated than that. Here's someone with some expertise being a bit more balanced about he whole thing. Reductive really? And then you post an incredibly slanted leftist video in the name of 'balance'! Fuck sake Tom get a hold of this, she refers to the fact that it is the US embargo that is most significantly to blame for poverty ridden Cubans, as opposed to dismal economic policy (I can give you a long list of this if you really need). And that's just one point of wild inaccuracy in this. Christ sake, gullible or what? Well I hope he sleeps more peacefully than his torture victims. Forgive me for having high standards, I prefer democratic socialism to be honest. Let's admire that, and leave cretins like Castro who stain the name of it to rot in the ground eh?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 27, 2016 8:37:19 GMT -5
A tyrant, a murderer and a thief. Good riddance. “ Crowds exhibit a docile respect for force, and are but slightly impressed by kindness, which for them is scarcely other than a form of weakness. Their sympathies have never been bestowed upon easy going masters, but the tyrants who vigorously oppressed them. It is to these latter that they always erect the loftiest statues." - Gustave Le bon, The Crowd.
|
|
|
Post by Manualex on Nov 27, 2016 8:52:12 GMT -5
A tyrant, a murderer and a thief. Good riddance. Reductive to the point of stupidity. Castro like most people is more complicated than that. Here's someone with some expertise being a bit more balanced about he whole thing. I have seen my country being reduced to a shit hole thanks to this bastard, his brother, the incompetent president we have and the one who tought he was so unbreakable that didnt do any tests before it was too late. For one who went against the usa and all of that represents he will be a hero, but he's no hero to be admired for his human rights record and meddleing into other countries for his own benefit and left his country in a weird place where you have two different countries one for the ones of the government and another for the people. People who had to leave their own country on poorly made boats because they wanted a better way of living.
|
|
|
Post by matt on Nov 27, 2016 8:59:34 GMT -5
Reductive to the point of stupidity. Castro like most people is more complicated than that. Here's someone with some expertise being a bit more balanced about he whole thing. I have seen my country being reduced to a shit hole thanks to this bastard, his brother, the incompetent president we have and the one who tought he was so unbreakable that didnt do any tests before it was too late. For one who went against the usa and all of that represents he will be a hero, but he's no hero to be admired for his human rights record and meddleing into other countries for his own benefit and left his country in a weird place where you have two different countries one for the ones of the government and another for the people. People who had to leave their own country on poorly made boats because they wanted a better way of living. I really fail to see how somebody like Tom can rage against the likes of Bush and Blair (and quite rightly), yet stresses the need for a more 'complicated' appraisal on Castro. Contradictory and unbelievably blindsided.
|
|
|
Post by The Escapist on Nov 27, 2016 9:03:03 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by matt on Nov 27, 2016 9:21:51 GMT -5
Great man, great leader. R.I.P. But of course people hate him because of Yankee propaganda. You should remember that even Nelson Mandela admired him and had a big respect for Castro. Yep, all those proven instances of rape, torture, forced labour, firing squads, repression of human rights - damn all that American propaganda deluding us into thinking this is terrible. You don't half spout utter shite pal.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 27, 2016 9:31:32 GMT -5
Great man, great leader. R.I.P. But of course people hate him because of Yankee propaganda. You should remember that even Nelson Mandela admired him and had a big respect for Castro. Yep, all those proven instances of rape, torture, forced labour, firing squads, repression of human rights - damn all that American propaganda deluding us into thinking this is terrible. You don't half spout utter shite pal. And USA is not guilty of those things you listed? Cuba was never going to be a peaceful country. And it didn't help that USA was constantly messing with them.
|
|
|
Post by spaneli on Nov 27, 2016 9:35:30 GMT -5
Reductive to the point of stupidity. Castro like most people is more complicated than that. Here's someone with some expertise being a bit more balanced about he whole thing. Reductive really? And then you post an incredibly slanted leftist video in the name of 'balance'! Fuck sake Tom get a hold of this, she refers to the fact that it is the US embargo that is most significantly to blame for poverty ridden Cubans, as opposed to dismal economic policy (I can give you a long list of this if you really need). And that's just one point of wild inaccuracy in this. Christ sake, gullible or what? Well I hope he sleeps more peacefully than his torture victims. Forgive me for having high standards, I prefer democratic socialism to be honest. Let's admire that, and leave cretins like Castro who stain the name of it to rot in the ground eh? Not going to lie, she's not half wrong about the embargo. You embargo any country and the economy is going down the shitter, especially because Cuba is 90 miles from the US. Some countries get a soft embargo, while Cuba got a hard embargo. That's an embargo that the US enforced every single day. No exports. No imports. No trade deals with American businesses or allies or any other country who didn't want penalties with dealing with the US. Their economy was fairly steady because the USSR provided soft trade deals, they were the only country that traded with Cuba save for a few developing Latin American countries who weren't afraid of pussing off the US. But with the collapse of the USSR, Cuba's economy subsequently went with it. You cannot underestimate the devastating impact that the embargo had on Cuba. Honestly, your assessment on their economy is a vast oversimplification. Though, human rights is a completely different story.
|
|
|
Post by matt on Nov 27, 2016 9:50:20 GMT -5
Reductive really? And then you post an incredibly slanted leftist video in the name of 'balance'! Fuck sake Tom get a hold of this, she refers to the fact that it is the US embargo that is most significantly to blame for poverty ridden Cubans, as opposed to dismal economic policy (I can give you a long list of this if you really need). And that's just one point of wild inaccuracy in this. Christ sake, gullible or what? Well I hope he sleeps more peacefully than his torture victims. Forgive me for having high standards, I prefer democratic socialism to be honest. Let's admire that, and leave cretins like Castro who stain the name of it to rot in the ground eh? Not going to lie, she's not half wrong about the embargo. You embargo any country and the economy is going down the shitter, especially because Cuba is 90 miles from the US. Some countries get a soft embargo, while Cuba got a hard embargo. That's an embargo that the US enforced every single day. No exports. No imports. No trade deals with American businesses or allies or any other country who didn't want penalties with dealing with the US. Their economy was fairly steady because the USSR provided soft trade deals, they were the only country that traded with Cuba save for a few developing Latin American countries who weren't afraid of pussing off the US. But with the collapse of the USSR, Cuba's economy subsequently went with it. You cannot underestimate the devastating impact that the embargo had on Cuba. Honestly, your assessment on their economy is a vast oversimplification. Though, human rights is a completely different story. Managers of state enterprises were selected for loyalty rather than professionalism and expertise, many more left the country as it was all about political gain rather than economic reasons. Manufacturing severely reduced with the policies. Also, workers efforts diverted to politics not productivity. Of course the US embargo had an effect, but on the whole, the regime's emphasis to put politics above practicalities severely harmed them.
|
|
|
Post by matt on Nov 27, 2016 9:53:52 GMT -5
Yep, all those proven instances of rape, torture, forced labour, firing squads, repression of human rights - damn all that American propaganda deluding us into thinking this is terrible. You don't half spout utter shite pal. And USA is not guilty of those things you listed? Cuba was never going to be a peaceful country. And it didn't help that USA was constantly messing with them. Whose talking about American actions here, and whose denying it? Nobody as far as I can see (though, in truth, enforced state torture in not near to the extent of brutality as Cuba). It's just that you think that people are led to believe that those crimes are bad merely because of propaganda? Unless you are in favour of all that or you are just confused. But then again, what do you expect from a Trump supporter?
|
|
|
Post by The Escapist on Nov 27, 2016 9:59:11 GMT -5
Oppose all states.
|
|
|
Post by spaneli on Nov 27, 2016 10:04:11 GMT -5
Not going to lie, she's not half wrong about the embargo. You embargo any country and the economy is going down the shitter, especially because Cuba is 90 miles from the US. Some countries get a soft embargo, while Cuba got a hard embargo. That's an embargo that the US enforced every single day. No exports. No imports. No trade deals with American businesses or allies or any other country who didn't want penalties with dealing with the US. Their economy was fairly steady because the USSR provided soft trade deals, they were the only country that traded with Cuba save for a few developing Latin American countries who weren't afraid of pussing off the US. But with the collapse of the USSR, Cuba's economy subsequently went with it. You cannot underestimate the devastating impact that the embargo had on Cuba. Honestly, your assessment on their economy is a vast oversimplification. Though, human rights is a completely different story. I don't think so - managers of state enterprises were selected for loyalty rather than professionalism and expertise, many more left the country as it was all about political gain rather than economic reasons. Manufacturing severely reduced with the policies. Also, workers efforts diverted to politics not productivity. Of course the US embargo had an effect, but on the whole, the regime's emphasis to put politics above practicalities severely harmed them. The embargo is key. The things you stated do not effect an economy as much as having limited exports and imports, and the inability to receive loans from other countries. These are basic ingredients for any economy to succeed. It doesn't matter who you hire or who leaves or who stays. You economy is going down the toilet if you don't have these. Take away the ability to trade and get loans from any country and that country's economy is dying a swift death no matter their policies. Because of a fall in trading partner, Cuba was reduced to one export, sugar. Once the sugar markets fell, the USSR propped up Cuba's economy by providing soft trade deals on sugar. Once the USSR collapsed, the decline in the sugar market hit Cuba and Cuba finally received an economy death knell. Who are you bringing to fix an economy with one export? No one.
|
|