1,000,000,000 times this. The FDNY and NYPD, on the most part, can't stand each other and fight constantly over who is in charge of a situation. Now imagine not just the FDNY and NYPD working in perfect harmony rather than fighting for control, but the CIA, Air Force, NSA, FBI, Secret Service, and the Army as well. Because of this, there would have been plenty of people who would have needed to know about this plan—people outside the Situation Room. Don't you think at least one of them would have had the conscience to leak something like this to the press before September 11? Info of top security is leaked to the press plenty enough as it is, so it wouldn't be so out of the question.

But nooooooo, these conspiratards can't believe it was just a bunch of pissed off Muslim extremists who went to flight school and learned how to take advantage of our airport security theater.

Also, as someone whose father was a 9/11 first responder and died from 9/11-related illness, I'd like to ask The-Ghost-Dancer one question: would you like to trade places, asshole?

This.

I think it happens at a subconscious level, but to some people it's less scary to think that our own government attacked us compared to a handful of thugs living in a cave in some third world country.

The realization that there are people hell bent on destroying our civilization scares them into such conspiracies.

I personally don't believe the 911 conspiracy theory because it would need so much planning. But I'm too open-minded to completely ignore the theory so I'll remain neutral. But one thing is sure, there are definitely some conspiracy theories which are true and I'm ready to believe (or consider) them if there are enough facts to support them.

Maybe the latest conspiracy theory I've started to believe is Cobain's murder. Soaked In Bleach was a great documentary about the subject.

I can't deny that I'm familiar with the points of the conspiracy and I think it induced entertaining Tv docus. It's interesting how documentaries like these can turn people into conspirators and let them watch 3D animations of the planes crashing into the towers over and over again. I think this alone is quite obscure and sinister. It's also quite primitive on their part because the conclusion is it's alleged cause and it's a bit like reading only the headline of an article back and forth.

There is no need to find another maximum of a shocking example when Donald Trump is on my Tv. 

the only building I believe may have been brought down is WTC 7 as theres not much reason why it would come down, theres multiple witness reports of explosions coming from the building as well people being told by fire fighters "its either going to come down on its own or we're going to bring it down", now Im only saying this because the building was badly damaged and they may of felt it needed to come down for safety not because it was rigged all along to collapse.

when it comes to the main WTC towers, a new design was used to make them apparently stronger for their height, traditional skyscrapers used a "box technique" of beams where you just keep building them one on top of the other whereas these towers used a different method of essentially having stronger outer support columns with an inner core which then youd suspend floors between them so this meant once the outer collumns were compromised the building lost a lot of its structural integrity, the fires caused the floors to bow downwards causing it to pull in on those outer collumns, once it gave way it just pancaked down, theres even footage of the inner core still standing on the south tour for a time before that came down too (so it just collapsed down around them)

you even look at the south tour collapse and you can see the corner that was damaged fall in on its self and from there the top 3rd section just fell in one whole piece, so it wasnt a tidy "controlled demolition" effect, plus the south tower came down first due to the plane coming in lower (more weight on the damaged area) as well the corner being more severely damaged.

from what I can see (could be wrong) this building design was developed purely for the WTC so therefore any other building that never collapsed from fire wasnt operating under the same framework as this one, its fundamental design was probably stronger in normal conditions but when it came to taking the damage it did here its simply possible the buildings design became a house of cards due to it relying on both the outer columns and the inner columns to stay strong, once one gave up then the floors arnt being held up on one side so they just fall and therefore cause a domino effect.

Its a simple case of the designers not thinking that anything like this would happen and therefore the building wasnt designed to managed this type of thing with the outer columns being compromised by high powered commercial jets being Deliberately flown into them with substantial fires to go along with it but then who would in in the 1960s? the towers were designed in a different era, it just wasnt thought of a possibility, you may of had fires inside but the outer columns wouldnt be compromised, here you had both so that spells collapse.  

the "explosions" seen coming from the building as it came down is probably simply a case of the floors pancaking and therefore forcing air out through the windows as they came down.

edit: for reference here is the footage of the corner collapsing, quite clearly shows it was a progressive collapse and not anything to with explosives.

Why is it even important if there were explosions by the way? The whole event could have been a conspiracy anyway.

You'd think that the supposed conspirators could come up with a better plan in which they didn't need to hide bombs inside the buildings. If it's so obvious that the planes couldn't have taken down the building why do you even need them in the first place?

There might have been some conspiracy theories that turned out to be true in the past but the arguments conspiracy theorists use for 9/11 are mostly pseudo-scientific explanations that they found out about on YouTube.

Not everything that the media tells us is true but a lot of the things the internet tells you aren't true either.

What, is there really people like that? Just insane.

The stupidity of people knows no bounds.

Seriously, just google search "9/11 no planes". It's crazy how many idiots are out there.

I think that the truth is somewhere in the middle. We'll probably never know.

One thing that's for sure is that 3000? innocent people lost their lives.

*edit*

Here's a challenge for all y'all conspiracy theorists:

If Bush/the U.S. govt planned and executed 9/11 to provide justification for an invasion of Iraq, then why bother implicating bin Laden to begin with, and then bring up Saddam? Why not just level lower Manhattan with a nuke allegedly from Iraq's WMD arsenal? This way, the U.S. would have the support of the rest of the world in their invasion, rather than having to act unilaterally. Wouldn't that be a lot easier than organizing the hijacking of four planes and also planting explosives in three skyscrapers?