|
Post by andybellwillring on Jun 10, 2016 16:45:30 GMT -5
In Rainbows is now on Spotify, which means I'm finally going to listen to it. Hoping for the best!
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Jun 10, 2016 21:02:08 GMT -5
In Rainbows is now on Spotify, which means I'm finally going to listen to it. Hoping for the best! Just go buy it. It's an excellent album for the collection.
|
|
|
Post by andybellwillring on Jun 11, 2016 10:28:35 GMT -5
In Rainbows is now on Spotify, which means I'm finally going to listen to it. Hoping for the best! Just go buy it. It's an excellent album for the collection. I do enjoy owning physical copies but I have neither record player nor access to car during my semesters, due to living in a tiny student room. I still search through the second-hand shops sometimes for the good stuff but people apparently like to keep their Radiohead records for some reason. Classic 90's records like Urban Hymns, Be Here Now, WTSMG and This Is My Truth Tell Me Yours are very common though.
|
|
|
Post by Sternumman on Jun 11, 2016 17:30:56 GMT -5
Why do these videos even exist? Just for views to generate ad dollars..
|
|
|
Post by matt on Jun 12, 2016 11:26:46 GMT -5
How's the album holding up for everyone? Am I right in saying it's been five weeks since release?
Listened to it the first time in well over a week, and it's still remarkable, flows beautifully too. One of the most cohesive albums they've ever released.
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Jun 12, 2016 11:38:39 GMT -5
How's the album holding up for everyone? Am I right in saying it's been five weeks since release? Listened to it the first time in well over a week, and it's still remarkable, flows beautifully too. One of the most cohesive albums they've ever released. It flows EXTREMELY well. It's amazing that it does that and it's constructed in alphabetical order. Coincidence??? You're right, one of their best ordered LPs for sure. First two weeks I listened to it everyday. Now maybe 1-2 a week and when random tracks pop up on my iPhone. Brilliant album. My favorite thus far in 2016.
|
|
|
Post by The Escapist on Jun 13, 2016 17:15:52 GMT -5
How's the album holding up for everyone? Am I right in saying it's been five weeks since release? Listened to it the first time in well over a week, and it's still remarkable, flows beautifully too. One of the most cohesive albums they've ever released. Just getting better and better for me. Picking up on new details every listen - as I'm typing this I just heard the sad snyth-y sound on the opposite side of the guitar solo in Identikit for the first time. I'll be interested to see where it ends up being generally ranked in Radiohead's discography when their career ends. It doesn't have the " This-Album-Changed-Music" aura that The Bends, Ok Computer, Kid A/mnesiac, and In Rainbows have, being released when Radiohead are no longer the most important band in the world (Viva la Arcade Fire) - but quality-wise, it's right up there for me. Really, though, it's a much better record than a band in their 31st year has any right to make.
|
|
|
Post by matt on Jun 13, 2016 17:31:39 GMT -5
How's the album holding up for everyone? Am I right in saying it's been five weeks since release? Listened to it the first time in well over a week, and it's still remarkable, flows beautifully too. One of the most cohesive albums they've ever released. Just getting better and better for me. Picking up on new details every listen - as I'm typing this I just heard the sad snyth-y sound on the opposite side of the guitar solo in Identikit for the first time. I'll be interested to see where it ends up being generally ranked in Radiohead's discography when their career ends. It doesn't have the " This-Album-Changed-Music" aura that The Bends, Ok Computer, Kid A/mnesiac, and In Rainbows have, being released when Radiohead are no longer the most important band in the world (Viva la Arcade Fire) - but quality-wise, it's right up there for me. Really, though, it's a much better record than a band in their 31st year has any right to make. I definitely agree with this. It's not a game changer but as I said on a previous thread, the ability for bands to make 'game changing' albums have deteriorated as I think musical innovation has arguably got to the point of saturation. So maybe it all has to be a bit more subtle like on this album. The next best thing is listening to bands and picking up on little subtle elements that contribute to the mood of the tune, like you mention with the synth like sound at the end of Identikit. It's just one little bit, but it's all marginal gains and added all together form one cohesive work of art. They all fit together like a jigsaw and it's only then you really appreciate the painstaking work that has gone into it. The brain picks up on it subconsciously on first listen - something is contributing to the moods you feel but you don't know what, and it's not just simply vocal melody. Only on the hundredth listen do you start figuratively taking it to bits in your mind! It's albums like these you'd like to hear the multitracks for. It's like that for loads of great albums and it's like a constant quest to search deeper into the songs you're listening to. Layered production (not overproduction mind) and all that, I love it. For a few of the best albums this year, I've heard this album, The Magnetic North album and David Bowie's new album and it's the beauty of the seamless nature of it for what are quite complex recordings. So the recording process - very complex, yet flows so naturally like a river. That's what you can sum up the soundscapes from this album.
|
|
|
Post by The Escapist on Jun 13, 2016 17:48:27 GMT -5
Just getting better and better for me. Picking up on new details every listen - as I'm typing this I just heard the sad snyth-y sound on the opposite side of the guitar solo in Identikit for the first time. I'll be interested to see where it ends up being generally ranked in Radiohead's discography when their career ends. It doesn't have the " This-Album-Changed-Music" aura that The Bends, Ok Computer, Kid A/mnesiac, and In Rainbows have, being released when Radiohead are no longer the most important band in the world (Viva la Arcade Fire) - but quality-wise, it's right up there for me. Really, though, it's a much better record than a band in their 31st year has any right to make. I definitely agree with this. It's not a game changer but as I said on a previous thread, the ability for bands to make 'game changing' albums have deteriorated as I think musical innovation has arguably got to the point of saturation. So maybe it all has to be a bit more subtle like on this album. The next best thing is listening to bands and picking up on little subtle elements that contribute to the mood of the tune, like you mention with the synth like sound at the end of Identikit. It's just one little bit, but it's all marginal gains and added all together form one cohesive work of art. They all fit together like a jigsaw and it's only then you really appreciate the painstaking work that has gone into it. The brain picks up on it subconsciously on first listen - something is contributing to the moods you feel but you don't know what, and it's not just simply vocal melody. Only on the hundredth listen do you start figuratively taking it to bits in your mind! It's albums like these you'd like to hear the multitracks for. It's like that for loads of great albums and it's like a constant quest to search deeper into the songs you're listening to. Layered production (not overproduction mind) and all that, I love it. For a few of the best albums this year, I've heard this album, The Magnetic North album and David Bowie's new album and it's the beauty of the seamless nature of it for what are quite complex recordings. So the recording process - very complex, yet flows so naturally like a river. That's what you can sum up the soundscapes from this album. Man, having the multitracks for a song like The Numbers would be incredible. The bass, drums, strings, vocals, laughing effects...I bet there's so many beautiful details to be heard. That's a point actually - has anyone OOPS-ed this album yet?
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Jun 13, 2016 18:56:50 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Jun 13, 2016 20:38:31 GMT -5
Burn the Witch.
Seriously, how can you listen to his voice? It's literally like nails on a chalkboard. Screeching, whining, gobshite.
|
|
|
Post by mystoryisgory on Jun 13, 2016 22:46:49 GMT -5
Burn the Witch. Seriously, how can you listen to his voice? It's literally like nails on a chalkboard. Screeching, whining, gobshite. Throw him on the fire, throw him on the fire, throw him on the....!!
|
|
|
Post by theyknowwhatimean on Jun 14, 2016 4:35:35 GMT -5
Love Adam Buxton. "As I speak, Jonny Greenwood is forty-four years of age - though, I'm sorry to say, that will change, thanks to the twattish and inexorable yomp of time..."
|
|
|
Post by arthurmorgan on Jun 14, 2016 10:12:12 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by arthurmorgan on Jun 14, 2016 10:19:30 GMT -5
By the way does anyone know why The King Of Limbs only reached number 7 in the UK charts at release. A Moon Shaped Pool and even In Rainbows got to number 1?
|
|
|
Post by mystoryisgory on Jun 14, 2016 11:14:16 GMT -5
By the way does anyone know why The King Of Limbs only reached number 7 in the UK charts at release. A Moon Shaped Pool and even In Rainbows got to number 1? It was because it was initially released only on Radiohead's website, so sales from there wouldn't be counted by OCC, and it didn't have the same publicity that surrounded In Rainbows that enabled it to reach number 1 when it was finally released on CD and vinyl.
|
|
|
Post by arthurmorgan on Jun 14, 2016 11:55:28 GMT -5
By the way does anyone know why The King Of Limbs only reached number 7 in the UK charts at release. A Moon Shaped Pool and even In Rainbows got to number 1? It was because it was initially released only on Radiohead's website, so sales from there wouldn't be counted by OCC, and it didn't have the same publicity that surrounded In Rainbows that enabled it to reach number 1 when it was finally released on CD and vinyl. Thank you. Couldn't find any information about it
|
|
|
Post by The Escapist on Jun 14, 2016 12:53:59 GMT -5
Packt Like Sardines is one groovy motherfucker.
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Jun 17, 2016 8:35:01 GMT -5
Anyone attending one of the Radiohead live streaming events at their local record shop?
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Jun 17, 2016 8:35:26 GMT -5
Burn the Witch. Seriously, how can you listen to his voice? It's literally like nails on a chalkboard. Screeching, whining, gobshite. #KermitLiam
|
|
|
Post by Sternumman on Jun 18, 2016 2:59:02 GMT -5
Anyone attending one of the Radiohead live streaming events at their local record shop? My nephew went tlast night. Said it sounded really good.
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Jun 18, 2016 20:52:59 GMT -5
A preview of Sunday's upcoming BBC interview with Jonny Greenwood. www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-36540679The setlists for your recent live shows have changed radically every night. How many songs did you rehearse? We started with 120. It's crazy. I mean, it's just every song we've done. And then we gave up and realised that was stupid and got it down to about 60 or 70, and we played 24 songs a night. So there's a lot to choose from. What was the thinking behind that? Variety. Keeping it fresh and interesting. It drives our crew crazy, as you might imagine, because they don't know what to do with the lights. But that's okay. We've always been like that. We've always decided the setlist just before we play. The image that's grown around Radiohead's studio work is that it's very tortured, very emotionally draining... a very difficult experience for everybody concerned. Is that is that true? It's by turns really exciting - and there's usually Thom [Yorke] in the middle of it getting very excited and motivating everyone and getting worked up about how well it's going - and then there's periods when nothing's happening and it's just not working and it's frustrating. But it's like that for everyone with work. When it's going well it's such an exciting and "up" and happy time that gets you through anything, really. It's only torturous looking back. Such as? We recorded No Surprises [from 1997's OK Computer album] and then worried about it. And then we recorded it again because it didn't sound very good. And then we recorded it again. And then went back to the very first recording and released it.So it's tortuous in that way. It's not like you're sitting looking for a kick drum sound for two weeks, it's more effort than that. More hitting brick walls over and over again. That's just how it goes. What are your memories of headlining Glastonbury in 1997 - a gig that is now regarded by many as one of the greatest Glastonbury performances ever. I just remember it being very stressful and the monitors breaking and Thom walking off because he couldn't hear anything and it just being a disaster! It was pretty bad. It was like, "We can't hear ourselves, and we don't know what's coming across," and then I remember asking Andy Watson, our lighting guy, to illuminate the audience so we could finally see them. I remember that. You can't hear what you're playing and you hope everyone is hearing each other and that something is coming across, but it was a struggle. You released your track Spectre on Christmas Day - explaining it had been intended as the theme as a James Bond theme, until Sam Smith's track was chosen instead. What happened? It wasn't right for the film, what we did. So we thought, "Great! Then it's ours. We can finish it how it's meant to be and we can release it." So that side of it was really positive, you know? But I guess there's lots of people interested in who does it [the Bond theme]. There's a lot riding on it and the song we did was just too dark or whatever, so that's fine. [It] means we get to have it back and it's ours and we got to put it out. We're really, really proud of it. Why be attached to an old fashioned idea of what a James Bond thing was and it being a big deal? It's like it's sort of stupid to get worked up about, really. A Moon Shaped Pool features a lot of arrangements by the London Contemporary Orchestra, who you're a great champion of. Well there's songs like Burn The Witch which, very rarely for us, we managed to get strings on near the beginning. We left it unfinished on purpose and left lots of room for the strings and we never do that usually. Usually the strings are the icing on top.At the end of Daydreaming I got the cellos to all tune their bottom strings down about a fifth [of an octave] but then still try to play the music. So you can hear them struggling to stay in tune and you have the low growl sound. You want to use strings in a way that isn't just pastiche and that can be hard to avoid. That was fun, trying to square that circle. I was lucky enough to see a couple of the recent shows and it looked like you were really enjoying being on stage. Yeah, it was really enjoyable. I think we're appreciating being in a band with each other in the moment and enjoying the sound that we put across. So it's a very happy time, yes. What can I say? There's nothing to complain about really!
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Jun 20, 2016 16:20:15 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by theyknowwhatimean on Jun 21, 2016 8:58:18 GMT -5
Pitchfork is to Radiohead what the NME is to Noel. Apart from when it comes to actual albums coming out, and criticism having to be given. NME have awarded only one record Noel Gallagher's been a part of a score of 9 (or more) out of 10. There are only two Radiohead records Pitchfork HAVEN'T rated at least 9/10. And you know Pitchfork don't hand out scores like that on a whim (unlike the NME - 10/10 for Arctic Monkey's last one, anyone?)... They're appalling fanboy bed wetters, and they must be stopped. And Pitchfork can do one, as well...
|
|
|
Post by theyknowwhatimean on Jun 25, 2016 11:18:32 GMT -5
|
|