|
Post by gastritispanic on Jul 16, 2006 18:06:37 GMT -5
I have never been crazy about political statements in music. Most political music is often left-wing complete with self-righteousness and all the easy opinions. I’m glad that oasis never did that kinda music. Who really care what musicians think about politics anyway? I know I don’t. If I was to join the ranks of some of the crestfallen oasis fans out there, Noel would have to get political. As long as he keeps it subtle like with mucky fingers it’s ok with me.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 16, 2006 21:29:20 GMT -5
I agree. Politics can mess up entire songs. I'm glad that Liam and Noel don't really comment about what they think about the war and such, it's better they focus on the music.
|
|
|
Post by wolffman on Jul 16, 2006 23:05:16 GMT -5
"Lets all Make Believe" could be seen as political.
|
|
rkid822
Madferrit Fan
"Lend me ten pounds, and I'll buy you a drink; and never wake me early in the morning.."
Posts: 65
|
Post by rkid822 on Jul 17, 2006 6:52:23 GMT -5
"Lets all Make Believe" could be seen as political. In a vague, universal kind of way sure. Oasis are refreshing because the music scene presently is filled with left-wing, self-deprecating pontifical cry-babies who feel they "know everything and will teach their audience how to think". Anyone who's been to a U2 show on the last tour will attest to that (I walked out of a show as my brother and cousin are in Iraq). I was pleasantly surprised when I saw Coldplay at MSG; they stuck to the music and left the soapbox home. When Liam called out Martin for denouncing the Iraq war a few years ago at the charity concert for cancer, it was fantastic. There's a time and a place for everything. Like Liam said, if Martin wants to "bang on about the war, do it at your own show; not a benefit for kids who are fighting a war against cancer everyday". Oasis broke the mold. While I know their politics personally lean to the left, they choose to play their music and not try to indoctrinate their audience. They are the last of a dying breed.
|
|
|
Post by Liffonmelsmork on Jul 17, 2006 13:23:16 GMT -5
Agreed.
As Noel says on the Definitely Maybe DVD, Up In The Sky is sort of political, but I think that's as far as Oasis will ever go. Thankfully.
|
|
|
Post by jlzoasis on Jul 17, 2006 14:46:56 GMT -5
I agree, bands like Pearl Jam that conutine to complian about EVERYTHING...while I agree was some of the stuff they say its like ...."oh come on! just play the music!!!" I do like mucky fingers I think it was perfectly placed and timed.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2006 14:57:49 GMT -5
Liam did that? Fuckin' awesome, that's the Liam we know and love.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 17, 2006 16:08:37 GMT -5
when done right i think politics and pop mix very well myself.
|
|
rkid822
Madferrit Fan
"Lend me ten pounds, and I'll buy you a drink; and never wake me early in the morning.."
Posts: 65
|
Post by rkid822 on Jul 17, 2006 16:19:10 GMT -5
when done right i think politics and pop mix very well myself. In the context of a song, sure. When it becomes a calling card for the band, the music suffers (see REM). When a band feels it is their mission to indoctrinate, I have a real problem. Another example is Pearl Jam. The first album was a true classic. Now, he's so anti-Bush and anti-government the albums are like wet sponges of liberal self-righteous dogcrap. I pay money to see a rock show, not to be lectured to by a singular point of view of the world's ills. If I wanted that, I'd stay home and watch CNN.
|
|
|
Post by globe on Jul 17, 2006 17:30:45 GMT -5
when done right i think politics and pop mix very well myself. In the context of a song, sure. When it becomes a calling card for the band, the music suffers (see REM). When a band feels it is their mission to indoctrinate, I have a real problem. Another example is Pearl Jam. The first album was a true classic. Now, he's so anti-Bush and anti-government the albums are like wet sponges of liberal self-righteous dogcrap. I pay money to see a rock show, not to be lectured to by a singular point of view of the world's ills. If I wanted that, I'd stay home and watch CNN. You should check out some of Billy Braggs stuff, I think you'd love him
|
|
|
Post by rustedrain on Jul 17, 2006 19:19:09 GMT -5
i love pearl jam but eddie just wont let go of politics i kinda think bush is coool guy my friends met him hes down to earth cool guy hes trying to run the country not a easy job so muicsicians should give any one in office slack you dont see bush go and telling people how bad people play the instruments i dunno i just hate music with political statements
|
|
|
Post by wolffman on Jul 17, 2006 20:05:15 GMT -5
Agreed. As Noel says on the Definitely Maybe DVD, Up In The Sky is sort of political, but I think that's as far as Oasis will ever go. Thankfully. Mucky Fingers is a million times more political than Up in the Sky
|
|
|
Post by lyla on Jul 18, 2006 0:34:57 GMT -5
i love pearl jam but eddie just wont let go of politics i kinda think bush is coool guy my friends met him hes down to earth cool guy hes trying to run the country not a easy job so muicsicians should give any one in office slack you dont see bush go and telling people how bad people play the instruments i dunno i just hate music with political statements i dont think music and politics can be so easily compared. music doesnt exactly effect much. well, it can make you happy, but its not generally life-effecting. and if you dont like it, you can always switch it off. politics on the other hand, has considerable more influence on how we live, the laws we abide by etc. you dont have to be a politician to have a say about politics. the purpose of politicians, in a democratic system anyway (even if they seem to forget it) is to represent their constituents and so if occasionally 'the people' (including musicians) want to comment on it, then go ahead, its our right to be heard cos for fucks sakes - thats their job to listen to us and make decisions with our interests in mind. that doesnt mean we should all go listen to political music (if indeed you can classify things as being 'political music'. like a lot of you guys see mucky fingers as a comment on iraq, but i can just as easily read it differently as a) nonsence b) not getting involved in sticky situations in general as the lyrics are ambiguous and do not explicitly refer to iraq. just cos 'noel said so' doesnt mean thats the only meaning. live forever was written about his mum, doesnt mean i think about peggy gallagher when i listen to it) but i reckon its well within an artists choice to comment on politics if they want to. i dont think we can say 'they shouldnt make political references, cos they should just stick to music' when ALL lyrics refer to some aspect to life - love, friends, religion. just cos i personally like songs with religious comments doesnt mean i think religious musicians are irritating and believe they ought to stick to more secular subject matter - i just choose not to listen to it. bush could very well be a lovely bloke, a great dad, a good driver, nice to his next door neighbour - but what has that got to do with being a good president? its the decisions and actions he takes that we are to consider when saying someone is a good president or not.
|
|
|
Post by seanppp on Jul 18, 2006 22:55:22 GMT -5
Oasis couldn't be political in their songs because they're not good enough songwriters (lyrically) to say anything political without it sounding terrible.
Musicians, as with anyone, can have any opinion they want. People think just because someone's a musician, or athlete, or whatever, that they shouldn't have opinions about anything other than what they do for a living. Rubbish. Freedom allows for people to say what they feel and that's never a bad thing. I don't think anyone should be limited just because of their job. If you don't like what they're saying (as with the person above who walked out) you have the freedom not to see them. Nobody should be restricted.
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Jul 18, 2006 23:33:30 GMT -5
oasisi are the fuckin best band int he wrold, even if they hdo have political views to the left
OASIS OASISI OASISI!!!!!!!!!!!111
MF, despite it being leftist, is still a dman good song, its subtle in waway that makes u think, yy'lnow......its genius....im for the war and i sitll think its genius, now thats says osomethhing
fuck u Michael Moore, u know fuck all u fat ass
|
|
|
Post by mape on Jul 18, 2006 23:47:31 GMT -5
Oasis couldn't be political in their songs because they're not good enough songwriters (lyrically) to say anything political without it sounding terrible. Musicians, as with anyone, can have any opinion they want. People think just because someone's a musician, or athlete, or whatever, that they shouldn't have opinions about anything other than what they do for a living. Rubbish. Freedom allows for people to say what they feel and that's never a bad thing. I don't think anyone should be limited just because of their job. If you don't like what they're saying (as with the person above who walked out) you have the freedom not to see them. Nobody should be restricted. agreed.
|
|
|
Post by henrod89 on Jul 18, 2006 23:49:06 GMT -5
yea, im glad oasis dont get too political. but i do think it's every musician's right to say what they want...and politics is a big issue , especially rite now. it just gets annoying sumtimes. greenday got ridiculous with it. i cant stand bush, but i couldnt even take greenday...it was just too much. and lyla took the words out of my mouth, just coz yer a nice person doesn't mean you're good at what u do. i dont care what anyone says, bush is awful and it's ashame he's in charge. and i'm not way left...i could care less what party you are. some of the things he has done is just unbelievable. so i can see why people write about it. it just gets old sumtimes.
- cheers !
|
|
|
Post by ToneBender on Jul 20, 2006 23:12:23 GMT -5
oasis dont get political? did you guys miss 96/97? mucky fingers, cigarettes and alcohol, up in the sky? they've made a career of defining the working class and rebelling against the conservative life they were brought up in. and by the way, you come to a rock show to see the music the band is making. if you don't like the music the band chooses to make because its too political, maybe you shouldn't be at the show. generally speaking, most art that isn't purely pop music/art/film/etc. has a statement to make. whether it be about the self, society, cows, or otherwise, there is generally something to go with it. also, i don't understand why someone above had to walk out of a u2 concert because bono was talking about politics and the person had family in iraq. most people that speak out against the war speak out because they don't want to see people die, whether the soldiers or the civilians..what part of that would make someone angry? supporting your troops doesn't necessarily mean supporting your war or international policies. so again, what did bono say that was so terrible? something along the lines of "bush lied and people died. plus, i don't really support the troops so id love to have them come home out of harms way."?
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Jul 20, 2006 23:48:36 GMT -5
i lean towards the right, as most of you know
but Oasis music doesnt piss me off, obviously.....the biggest political song is MF cos its about the war
the other songs...we'll -- they are about not giving a fuck about authority and the 'standard' way of life , pure rebellion and being the teen i am, i dig that attitude
|
|
|
Post by lyla on Jul 21, 2006 4:14:32 GMT -5
and since no one has mentioned it yet - oasis and new labour....!! conservative rule sucks, blair will change everything, vote labour!
if thats not artists getting political, dunno what is. doesnt make them a 'political band' but they've definitely got involved esp at the beginning cos it was their roots, and they were talking about LIFE which was affected by the political situation in britain, as settins0n said...of course, they dont need to be arsed making political comments, as they sit with millions of pounds in the bank =D
|
|
keeso
Madferrit Fan
Posts: 60
|
Post by keeso on Jul 25, 2006 21:03:02 GMT -5
when done right i think politics and pop mix very well myself. I pay money to see a rock show, not to be lectured to by a singular point of view of the world's ills. If I wanted that, I'd stay home and watch CNN. Right on brother!
|
|
|
Post by ToneBender on Jul 27, 2006 12:51:47 GMT -5
im still curious about the person who had to leave the U2 concert because of bono's political statements..but really, why not just use the political rant part as an opportunity to go to the bathroom or get a beer or something? the last oasis show i went to i had to take a piss during mucky fingers/live forever. wish noel had gone on a political rant instead of playing the songs with no quit! the thing of it is that a lot of country music is conservative, a lot of punk music is super liberal, though i tend to think more on the libertarian side (not all that different from some country music), and most rock music is left leaning centrist thought that will go with the flow most of the time until they are roused into responding to an absurdity in the theater that is politics. you know all of this going into the music you choose to listen to. if not, you're a fairly naive individual. for the life of me i cannot understand people that take issue with others for speaking out against the war as its "not supporting troops." if bono, chris martin, and noel gallagher stand up and say "we should not be fighting a war in iraq, lets get a plan and get out of there asap", which part of that doesnt support the troops? the part where they want troops out of harms way because theyve already seen X amount of Americans, Brits, and Iraqis killed? Maybe if people said "our nations security is imperiled by the idea of leaving a country ravaged in civil war and being run over with terrorism", you might have something there. But the argument that speaking out against the war doesnt support troops is just bullshit. Look at cuts the Bush administration has made to Veterans programs. Or perhaps look into the body armor and vehicle armor issues. To paraphrase, "You go to war with the army you have, not always the army you want". That was said by the secretary of defense. "Get out of the war so our soldiers stop getting killed". Thats the common phrase coming out of the Left. Which one supports the troops? Rant done .
|
|
lee
Oasis Roadie
www.myspace.com/lee_ccfc
Posts: 392
|
Post by lee on Jul 30, 2006 6:25:41 GMT -5
"Lets all Make Believe" could be seen as political. Why?
|
|
|
Post by ToneBender on Jul 31, 2006 8:21:17 GMT -5
I always thought Lets All Make Believe was aimed at some of the departing bandmembers...
|
|
|
Post by His Royal Majesty Revolver on Jul 31, 2006 14:20:09 GMT -5
Yeah... it's as though politics is cliche
And it is... stuff like let's all get along is cool because it's not like "the war is killing innocent civilians" ..... civilian isn't a word you want to see in lyrics
|
|