|
Iraq
Jun 26, 2014 14:54:10 GMT -5
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Jun 26, 2014 14:54:10 GMT -5
|
|
|
Iraq
Jun 26, 2014 15:16:30 GMT -5
NYR likes this
Post by spaneli on Jun 26, 2014 15:16:30 GMT -5
Yep, sounds like NL4E to quote one of the people who started the war. Cause why would the Cheney's want to blacken their name more than it has been? Of course under the leadership of Dick Cheney the war was nearly won. Why would it not be? Of course we should believe the words of the same person who used their words to browbeat us into a war. Makes complete sense. Just going to put this here. Do with it what you will. www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2014/06/25/gop_should_listen_to_cheney_-_not_paul_-_on_iraq.htmlLet's start with this. How the article begins: "Republican insider Ed Rogers" Let say Obama came out with an op-ed saying that the war was not virtually won. Then, let's say, I don't know for shits and giggles, Elizabeth Warren said differently. Then let's say in order to prove my point, I post an article that begins with "Democratic insider James Carville writing for the Washington Post, has urged Democrats to heed Elizabeth Warren." Now, let's say said article was not written by Mark Salter, someone who clearly has a Republican slant as someone who worked on the McCain campaign and was his chief of staff, but instead it was David Axlerod, someone who clearly has a democratic slant. How would you react to such an article? If you had any sense, you'd be pissed that I would stoop as low to treat you like an idiot by posting an article that clearly could have been researched, that clearly could have a slant identified, that clearly is partisan. Now I don't know you personally NL4E. Maybe you have no qualms against this. Maybe you don't mind being treated like an idiot, but other people do. When you treat people like idiots NL4E, you deserve to be called a clown. The only person who has been put in their place is you because for all of your education and those who have been your professors, you have still not been tutored in how to construct an argument with reasonable evidence. You can't even provide proper sources. Next time, if you want someone to take you seriously and not call you a clown, then try not treating them as such by not having the respect to assume they have reasoning powers to capably explicate an article. Provide actual proof to back-up your claim. Until you do that, you've put no one in their place except for yourself.
|
|
|
Post by jakob61907 on Jun 26, 2014 21:45:01 GMT -5
Let's start with this. How the article begins: "Republican insider Ed Rogers" Let say Obama came out with an op-ed saying that the war was not virtually won. Then, let's say, I don't know for shits and giggles, Elizabeth Warren said differently. Then let's say in order to prove my point, I post an article that begins with "Democratic insider James Carville writing for the Washington Post, has urged Democrats to heed Elizabeth Warren." Now, let's say said article was not written by Mark Salter, someone who clearly has a Republican slant as someone who worked on the McCain campaign and was his chief of staff, but instead it was David Axlerod, someone who clearly has a democratic slant. How would you react to such an article? If you had any sense, you'd be pissed that I would stoop as low to treat you like an idiot by posting an article that clearly could have been researched, that clearly could have a slant identified, that clearly is partisan. Now I don't know you personally NL4E. Maybe you have no qualms against this. Maybe you don't mind being treated like an idiot, but other people do. When you treat people like idiots NL4E, you deserve to be called a clown. The only person who has been put in their place is you because for all of your education and those who have been your professors, you have still not been tutored in how to construct an argument with reasonable evidence. You can't even provide proper sources. Next time, if you want someone to take you seriously and not call you a clown, then try not treating them as such by not having the respect to assume they have reasoning powers to capably explicate an article. Provide actual proof to back-up your claim. Until you do that, you've put no one in their place except for yourself. Next he'll be posting foxnews articles as legit and expect to be taken seriously. Oh he already has I do have worries about this world
|
|
|
Post by globe on Jun 27, 2014 2:34:35 GMT -5
If you are above name calling, then you wont mind me calling you a horrible, mis-informed right-wing vagina then? Iraq will never be "won". Afghanistan will never be "won". Al Qaeda, ISIS, Taliban, call them whatever you wan't, they will never go away, no matter how many bombs you drop on innocent people. You've clearly been brain-washed by the biased media you watch and read. How about you speak to somebody from these places and see what they think of your claim of things being "virtually won".
|
|
|
Iraq
Jun 27, 2014 19:14:05 GMT -5
Post by NYR on Jun 27, 2014 19:14:05 GMT -5
If you are above name calling, then you wont mind me calling you a horrible, mis-informed right-wing vagina then? Iraq will never be "won". Afghanistan will never be "won". Al Qaeda, ISIS, Taliban, call them whatever you wan't, they will never go away, no matter how many bombs you drop on innocent people. You've clearly been brain-washed by the biased media you watch and read. How about you speak to somebody from these places and see what they think of your claim of things being "virtually won". Can I get an AMEN? Plus, Cheeks forgets that the Bush administration drew up the plans of the withdrawal from Iraq.
|
|
|
Iraq
Jul 5, 2014 15:53:32 GMT -5
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Jul 5, 2014 15:53:32 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by NYR on Jul 9, 2014 14:31:57 GMT -5
Will you stop it with the links, think for yourself and just speak your own damn mind? It's intellectually lazy. You're better than that.
|
|
|
Post by globe on Jul 10, 2014 2:49:28 GMT -5
Aye OK, Clinton was a vagina too then. Deary fucking me.
|
|