|
Post by Bruno on Jul 14, 2013 14:18:30 GMT -5
Thom Yorke just tweeted this....Make no mistake new artists you discover on #Spotify will no get paid. meanwhile shareholders will shortly being rolling in it. Simples.“your small meaningless rebellion is only hurting your fans ... a drop in the bucket really” No we're standing up for our fellow musiciansNigel Godrich also tweeting about this...I think the point is - that streaming suits catalogue.. But cannot work as a way of supporting new artists work.. Spotify and the like ..
..either have to address that fact and change the model for releases or else all new music producers should be bold and vote with..their feet. They have no power without new music..
Someone gotta say something. It's bad for new music..The reason is that new artists get paid fuck all with this model.. It's an equation that just doesn't work. The music industry is being taken over by the back door.. and if we don't try and make it fair for new music producers and artists....then the art will suffer. Make no mistake. These are all the same old industry bods trying to get a stranglehold on the delivery system..The numbers don't even add up for spotify yet.. But it's not about that.. It's about establishing the model which will be extremely valuable. Meanwhile small labels and new artists can't even keep their lights on. It's just not right
Plus people are scared to speak up or not take part as they are told they will lose invaluable exposure if they don't play ball. Meanwhile millions of streams gets them a few thousand dollars.. Not like radio at all. Anyway, Thems the breaks. Opinions welcome.. but discussion and new thinking necessary.. If you have a massive catalogue - a major label.....for example.. then you're quids in. It's money for old rope.. But making new recorded music needs funding.. Some records can be made in a laptop, but some need musician and skilled technicians.. These things cost money.. Pink floyds catalogue has already generated billions of dollars for someone(not necessarily the band) so now putting it on a streaming site makes total sense.. But if people had been listening to spotify instead of buying records in 1973... I doubt very much if dark side would have been made.. It would just be too expensive. Anyway thumbs hurting now...
|
|
|
Post by marqueemoon on Jul 14, 2013 14:29:04 GMT -5
It is true... But I won't stop using it. It is such a massive and impressive resource for any music fan who doesn't have the money to go out and buy every single record by every single band you've ever wanted to listen to.
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Jul 14, 2013 22:27:23 GMT -5
It is true... But I won't stop using it. It is such a massive and impressive resource for any music fan who doesn't have the money to go out and buy every single record by every single band you've ever wanted to listen to. This happened all once before, I believe it was called.....NAPSTER. What an era for music but 100% wrong. Thom and Nigel are extremely intelligent on these matters. I agree with them and have never used spotify.
|
|
|
Post by Bruno on Jul 15, 2013 0:30:52 GMT -5
I've also never used Spotify.
If the artists aren't getting paid, then what's the difference between Spotify and illegal downloads? Simple answer, nothing.
|
|
|
Post by Jessica on Jul 15, 2013 1:14:58 GMT -5
What matters to these new artists is that they get heard. You don't go into this business today to make money, and it's never been about the money, it's about making great music. Spotify and Rdio may not pay great, but the music is being heard, it's being shared, people are doing their research to find more about these bands, and that's the real benefit of being on them.
It's annoying that a guy who has sold millions and millions of albums and songs over the last two decades is trying to stand up for something by removing his less successful work. If he really cared, he would have removed all of Radiohead's discography from the two services. But no, those albums and songs are still making money, so they don't dare touch those.
|
|
|
Post by marqueemoon on Jul 15, 2013 1:14:59 GMT -5
Major artists still get paid. The point they're trying to make is that younger artists don't get paid. Is it wrong? Yeah. But they're kidding themselves by saying it doesn't offer a good amount of exposure. If it isn't Spotify its legally streaming on sites like Bandcamp, Soundcloud, or Youtube.
There isn't anything wrong with using Spotify to find a band you like and then going to their gig, buying their album, etc. The problem isn't entirely Spotify, its the entire mindset that it (along with so many other streaming services and websites) promotes. The mindset that music isn't worth as much as it used to be. That it isn't worth the cost that musicians pay to make it. The same mindset that Radiohead promoted by giving away In Rainbows.
I love Radiohead, Jonny Greenwood is one of the greatest musicians to step foot on this planet, but Thom comes off as hypocritical at times. I know he means well, but sometimes it comes off as a lot of hot air. I honestly don't see how a multimillionaire taking down some of his music from Spotify will do anything. Good for his own soul, maybe, but I would like for him to go up to a small, unknown band and tell them to take down all their music. It must be easy for him because he has all the money and attention he could possibly want.
That being said... Radiohead: one of the best bands on the planet. Thom: Generally seems like a nice guy with his heart in the right place, but the hero worship around him is sickening.
|
|
|
Post by Bruno on Jul 15, 2013 1:24:55 GMT -5
Major artists still get paid. The point they're trying to make is that younger artists don't get paid. Is it wrong? Yeah. But they're kidding themselves by saying it doesn't offer a good amount of exposure. If it isn't Spotify its legally streaming on sites like Bandcamp, Soundcloud, or Youtube. There isn't anything wrong with using Spotify to find a band you like and then going to their gig, buying their album, etc. The problem isn't entirely Spotify, its the entire mindset that it (along with so many other streaming services and websites) promotes. The mindset that music isn't worth as much as it used to be. That it isn't worth the cost that musicians pay to make it. The same mindset that Radiohead promoted by giving away In Rainbows. I love Radiohead, Jonny Greenwood is one of the greatest musicians to step foot on this planet, but Thom comes off as hypocritical at times. I know he means well, but sometimes it comes off as a lot of hot air. I honestly don't see how a multimillionaire taking down some of his music from Spotify will do anything. Good for his own soul, maybe, but I would like for him to go up to a small, unknown band and tell them to take down all their music. It must be easy for him because he has all the money and attention he could possibly want. That being said... Radiohead: one of the best bands on the planet. Thom: Generally seems like a nice guy with his heart in the right place, but the hero worship around him is sickening. I've only heard one Radiohead album till date, so no hero worship here. Relax, there's no need to get this worked up.
|
|
|
Post by marqueemoon on Jul 15, 2013 1:26:55 GMT -5
Major artists still get paid. The point they're trying to make is that younger artists don't get paid. Is it wrong? Yeah. But they're kidding themselves by saying it doesn't offer a good amount of exposure. If it isn't Spotify its legally streaming on sites like Bandcamp, Soundcloud, or Youtube. There isn't anything wrong with using Spotify to find a band you like and then going to their gig, buying their album, etc. The problem isn't entirely Spotify, its the entire mindset that it (along with so many other streaming services and websites) promotes. The mindset that music isn't worth as much as it used to be. That it isn't worth the cost that musicians pay to make it. The same mindset that Radiohead promoted by giving away In Rainbows. I love Radiohead, Jonny Greenwood is one of the greatest musicians to step foot on this planet, but Thom comes off as hypocritical at times. I know he means well, but sometimes it comes off as a lot of hot air. I honestly don't see how a multimillionaire taking down some of his music from Spotify will do anything. Good for his own soul, maybe, but I would like for him to go up to a small, unknown band and tell them to take down all their music. It must be easy for him because he has all the money and attention he could possibly want. That being said... Radiohead: one of the best bands on the planet. Thom: Generally seems like a nice guy with his heart in the right place, but the hero worship around him is sickening. I've only heard one Radiohead album till date, so no hero worship here. Relax, there's no need to get this worked up. I wasn't talking about you or anyone in this thread, but just out of personal experience. And not worked up at all, just have an overly wordy opinion on the topic. Its nice to talk about something other than speculation on Noel's new album or Beady Eye record sales.
|
|
|
Post by Bruno on Jul 15, 2013 1:29:32 GMT -5
I wasn't talking about you or anyone in this thread, but just out of personal experience. And not worked up at all, just have an overly wordy opinion on the topic. Its nice to talk about something other than speculation on Noel's new album or Beady Eye record sales. Haha sorry about that then. But true, a little break from speculating and bickering on BE/NGHFB once in a while is refreshing.
|
|
|
Post by marqueemoon on Jul 15, 2013 1:34:51 GMT -5
I wasn't talking about you or anyone in this thread, but just out of personal experience. And not worked up at all, just have an overly wordy opinion on the topic. Its nice to talk about something other than speculation on Noel's new album or Beady Eye record sales. Haha sorry about that then. But true, a little break from speculating and bickering on BE/NGHFB once in a while is refreshing. No worries man, haha. I suppose I wrote too much, I just find the topic fascinating as its probably one of the most important topics of the music industry my generation is growing into. I actually had a friend who interned at a company that makes sure band/musicians get fair compensation from their Youtube views. Funnily enough, he mentioned potentially getting Radiohead as a client! Not sure if anything came out of that though.
|
|
|
Post by Bruno on Jul 15, 2013 1:40:30 GMT -5
Haha sorry about that then. But true, a little break from speculating and bickering on BE/NGHFB once in a while is refreshing. No worries man, haha. I suppose I wrote too much, I just find the topic fascinating as its probably one of the most important topics of the music industry my generation is growing into. I actually had a friend who interned at a company that makes sure band/musicians get fair compensation from their Youtube views. Funnily enough, he mentioned potentially getting Radiohead as a client! Not sure if anything came out of that though. I don't know very much about Spotify, some of my friends in college use it. Must ask them how it works. Though I found some opinions in this thread quite interesting. I'm not closed to changing my opinion on Spotify if it's convincing enough.
|
|
|
Post by Jessica on Jul 15, 2013 2:09:08 GMT -5
I recently signed up for the $25 iTunes Match and am using the new Radio feature in the iOS 7 beta on my iPad Mini. I think if any artist will benefit, it will be from Apple's royalties because they don't price cheap to begin with and it's all about being profitable. Hence they got busted for the e-book scheme just now. I rarely use Spotify anymore, but did for awhile. I stopped using it because I found that buying my music came out cheaper. But I still want the streaming aspect, hence I use iTunes Match. Can still be cheap and buy my music elsewhere and import it though. Artists still get money, that's how Apple is making artists their money with piracy, lol. We're still in the generation where people pirate a lot, but I think that scene is going to be really different in the next five years, and more and more of the little kids now will be using Spotify, Rdio, Rhapsody, etc. when they're older so it's going to be a lot more profitable. A lot of these "little artists" give their music away on Bandcamp and their websites. I don't get it? Pay $0 or a small amount of your choosing and get a MP3 VBR, 320 kbps, or FLAC. And they complain because streaming sites aren't paying?
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Jul 15, 2013 6:30:23 GMT -5
What matters to these new artists is that they get heard. You don't go into this business today to make money, and it's never been about the money, it's about making great music. Spotify and Rdio may not pay great, but the music is being heard, it's being shared, people are doing their research to find more about these bands, and that's the real benefit of being on them. It's annoying that a guy who has sold millions and millions of albums and songs over the last two decades is trying to stand up for something by removing his less successful work. If he really cared, he would have removed all of Radiohead's discography from the two services. But no, those albums and songs are still making money, so they don't dare touch those.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 15, 2013 9:44:47 GMT -5
What matters to these new artists is that they get heard. You don't go into this business today to make money, and it's never been about the money, it's about making great music. Spotify and Rdio may not pay great, but the music is being heard, it's being shared, people are doing their research to find more about these bands, and that's the real benefit of being on them. It's annoying that a guy who has sold millions and millions of albums and songs over the last two decades is trying to stand up for something by removing his less successful work. If he really cared, he would have removed all of Radiohead's discography from the two services. But no, those albums and songs are still making money, so they don't dare touch those. Your first point in the same kind of thing that leads to 'interns', where its all about' hey, write for us/do this job, you don't get paid but it's exposure. bollocks to all that, it's capitalist exploitation is what it is. And anyone foolish enough to do it deserves it, only it leads to a situation where kids from rich do it and those that acutally need to earn some money get frozen out. Same with music. Your are wrong about "it's never been about the money" ALL successful bands want money, fame, sex, drugs, the whole lot. It's actually even worse now with 'brit school' type things all over the UK that give as much emphasis to the business side as they do the creative. Radio DIOES pay great, at least in the UK and certain other markets such as Germany. Getting paid by the BBC for radio play has been a way that writers and performers have fianced themselves for years. Spotify is a scam and it is in essence no different from so called 'illegal downloading'. Your point about Radiohead's materail still being on there and using it as a slag off is also wrong. Obviously the stuff that has been removed is within their pwoer to do so, the Radiohead materail will be 'owned' by a major and Yorke will have no say on how it is distributed or exploited.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 15, 2013 11:03:57 GMT -5
Honestly I don't care what Metallica or Radiohead think about anything but there next lp ... If I choose to use it ,and have I will , if I want to buy a illegal t shirt I will. , I will also buy the official one and will buy the official cd ... Too many judges to me
Edit : same goes for Noel and Liam , just care about there music not there opinions on life or buisness or footy ... If there's something I want to listen to I will illegal or not moral or not ,ill live and sleep very well
|
|
|
Post by Bruno on Jul 15, 2013 11:50:34 GMT -5
I wonder how long the Spotify model will work. It'll be interesting to see if they can last or eventually get pulled down and boycotted like Napster. Seems distant and highly unlikely but with such big names of the music industry unhappy with their business model I'm quite sure we'll eventually see a few more musicians airing their grievances about Spotify in the not so distant future. Should be interesting how things pan out. Haha, just found this out after doing some research. Guess who is on the board of Spotify? Sean Parker, the creator of Napster..that's who! And so the plot thickens. Some other artists speaking out against Spotify... Patrick Carney of the Black Keys said that "Spotify isn't fair to artists" and that for "a band that makes a living selling music, streaming services are not a 'feasible' option." He called Spotify board member Sean Parker an "asshole" in reply to his claim that Spotify would make more money for the music industry than iTunes. "That guy has $2 billion that he made from figuring out ways to steal royalties from artists, and that’s the bottom line. You can’t really trust anybody like that."
|
|
|
Post by marqueemoon on Jul 15, 2013 15:40:03 GMT -5
I doubt Spotify will last that long. That being said, if its not one thing (Napster) than its another (Spotify). Something like this will always pop up. A much more interesting take on the issue: www.nme.com/blogs/nme-blogs/the-spotify-debate-a-new-artist-weighs-in?recache=1&t=1231315"I'd be the first to agree that the old industry model is flawed, but no more so than this new one. We need to look to different approaches such as drip.fm, where you are able to subscribe on a much smaller scale to a record label like Domino or Captured Tracks. This way, many of the middle men employed in the music industry aren't taking such a cut and both the labels and artists benefit."
|
|
|
Post by jasroy on Jul 25, 2013 20:32:11 GMT -5
As somebody whose band is streamed on Spotify I can tell you that it pays .0003 cents USD per stream. Just fyi. That's straight from our financial guys.
|
|
|
Post by Sternumman on Jul 27, 2013 12:14:54 GMT -5
As somebody whose band is streamed on Spotify I can tell you that it pays .0003 cents USD per stream. Just fyi. That's straight from our financial guys. What would happen if you opened spoify and just played the song on repeat for ever?
|
|
|
Post by jasroy on Jul 27, 2013 19:27:18 GMT -5
We tested that. Doesn't quite work that way. Good idea though
|
|