|
|
Post by bluebird1992 on Jul 29, 2011 18:27:53 GMT -5
Somebody's put the audio from the Rio 2009 soundcheck over the Choir and string version released last week. It sounds incredible.
|
|
|
|
Post by deasy on Jul 29, 2011 18:29:37 GMT -5
We know. A member of this forum made it ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by MasterplanMatt on Jul 29, 2011 18:32:40 GMT -5
We know. A member of this forum made it ;D |
|
|
|
Post by gdforever on Jul 29, 2011 23:48:29 GMT -5
I love when things that come from here come back.
|
|
cushy
Oasis Roadie
It's better to burn out, than to fade away
Posts: 133
|
Post by cushy on Jul 30, 2011 0:13:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by BEng on Aug 14, 2011 16:25:39 GMT -5
Okay reading the reactions in this thread, there apparently already is a thread about this subject, but I couldn't find it either, so...
Anyway this deserves a bit more attention: that person put up a second, better synced version.\
This already sounds amazing, I only can imagine how the original is going to sound...
|
|
|
|
Post by RocketMan on Aug 14, 2011 16:35:08 GMT -5
i think the song structure is a bit different in the final version. the choir and strings doesn't fit the guitar enough even though it's just a synced version
|
|
|
|
Post by BEng on Aug 14, 2011 16:44:14 GMT -5
i think the song structure is a bit different in the final version. the choir and strings doesn't fit the guitar enough even though it's just a synced version Yeah indeed. But in this version there are already some moments where his voice and the strings "fit", and those moments are already very moving... Since it's the album opener my expectations of this song are very high. |
|
|
|
Post by gdforever on Aug 14, 2011 16:48:42 GMT -5
That "hang in there love, you gotta hold on" line is gonna be chill inducing in the final version.
|
|
|
|
Post by deadman on Aug 14, 2011 17:22:44 GMT -5
i think the song structure is a bit different in the final version. the choir and strings doesn't fit the guitar enough even though it's just a synced version No, it's pretty much the same other than after the second chorus (the isolated oohs from the choir), then it goes fits back in with the guitar. This newly synced version is still not quite right, it's a decent effort, but it's a bit short of that guy who uploaded it to Soundcloud, total length 5:08. |
|
|
|
Post by Silence Dogood on Aug 14, 2011 17:35:57 GMT -5
very much looking forward to this. shit sounds amazing.
|
|
|
|
Post by bridge on Aug 14, 2011 18:51:41 GMT -5
Fucking incredible. And this just a synced fan-made "demo". It sounds like it's going to be a haunting start to the album.
I know it probably won't be, but I'd love it if this album was seamless.
|
|
|
|
Post by Level 03 on Aug 14, 2011 19:13:09 GMT -5
Very great !
|
|
|
|
Post by mercury3164 on Aug 14, 2011 20:41:41 GMT -5
i did a sync a while ago which can be found in the sound and vision section... I think i hit it a lot tighter than either of these
|
|
|
|
Post by Level 03 on Aug 14, 2011 21:13:27 GMT -5
The best version could from the man would be albe to modified the instrue and choir with the soundcheck vesion and not the inverse...
|
|
|
|
Post by gdforever on Aug 14, 2011 23:13:25 GMT -5
But we know the choir and strings are at the correct pace. So why would they adjust the one that we know is the proper tempo?
|
|
|
|
Post by paranoidandroid on Aug 15, 2011 3:20:26 GMT -5
That "hang in there love, you gotta hold on" line is gonna be chill inducing in the final version. Yep, i cant wait to hear the finished version of this. This part of the song you speak of is the best and it'd go on forever if i had my way |
|
|
|
Post by mercury3164 on Aug 15, 2011 21:43:05 GMT -5
But we know the choir and strings are at the correct pace. So why would they adjust the one that we know is the proper tempo? Exactly, even though it is simple to do it the other way there would be no point. The soundcheck version drags wayy too much, especially now that we've all heard the proper tempo. |
|
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5