|
|
Post by mossy on Jul 26, 2011 14:36:50 GMT -5
Just read Noel's interview in Q magazine where he talks about recording a third album, and I'm a bit confused. Here's the extract: "Now I'm a free agent I thought I've got all these songs, so I'll make two records - but between you and me I made three, the third was going to be called The Future Of Martial Arts. I had nine great songs but had to split them up. I wanted to do some work with Amorphous Androgynous... so I made the albums concurrently. It was really exciting being that creative, but by the end I was sick of it." When he says "split them up", do you think he means he split the album release schedule - i.e. he's releasing two albums now and has a third album recorded, which is ready to go whenever he feels like it? Or does he mean he split the tracks from the third album and they're now on the other two albums instead? Or with a title like ' The Future of Martial Arts' is he just taking the piss  |
|
|
|
Post by shoes222 on Jul 26, 2011 14:38:05 GMT -5
That is a Noel joke.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2011 14:39:48 GMT -5
He's taking the piss
|
|
|
|
Post by deasy on Jul 26, 2011 14:40:31 GMT -5
I don't think it is. The title probably is but I think he may have been serious about a 3rd album that he abandoned. If it was a joke, then it certainly wasn't funny  |
|
|
|
Post by bonkers on Jul 26, 2011 14:42:49 GMT -5
no doubt he has the songs for a third album but we all know Noel likes a 3 year holiday between albums, im amazed he's even done 2
he must be worn out!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by gaspanic23 on Jul 26, 2011 14:43:09 GMT -5
The title is bullshit yeah, but it does seem like he's been writing a lot lately so it is possible that he's already stashing some songs for the future.
|
|
|
|
Post by Frank Lee Vulgar on Jul 26, 2011 14:43:38 GMT -5
Might be half-jokingly as he probably has a plan for his third album already. But the name is obviously a joke.
|
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Jul 26, 2011 14:53:38 GMT -5
My guess is he had enough songs for 3 albums, but ended up putting 2 albums out and using more of the songs he had for the AA album. Isn't that 2nd suppose to be 18 songs? If so, that's a total of 28 which is almost enough for 3 full albums....Math saves the day.
The title was probably a Noel joke, don't think he would have carried through with that haha, but as the math shows it looks like he means he split the tracks into 2 albums, rather than having 3 albums
|
|
dion
Oasis Roadie
Posts: 362
|
Post by dion on Jul 26, 2011 14:54:52 GMT -5
I dont think he'll fall into a three year cycle again, it wasn't Oasis, he wont have to do 100 date stadium tours.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 26, 2011 14:56:12 GMT -5
Not too mention, he will be dropping b-sides alongside his singles, so he has a lot of material to get out. the title is total bull though.
|
|
|
|
Post by lookingtothesky on Jul 26, 2011 14:59:16 GMT -5
Noel probably has material to make 3 or 4 albums. Whether he uses the songs or not is another question.
|
|
|
|
Post by mossy on Jul 26, 2011 15:24:27 GMT -5
Although the AA album is going to have 18 tracks, the way it was described as a companion album to HFB makes me expect some of the tunes to be different versions of ones already released on HFB. (Like the DOYS bonus disc.)
|
|
|
|
Post by aaronon on Jul 26, 2011 16:33:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by deasy on Jul 26, 2011 16:35:08 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by shoes222 on Jul 26, 2011 16:36:12 GMT -5
You might want to scroll down the page a bit before you make a new thread.
|
|
|
|
Post by johnnyb on Jul 26, 2011 16:36:40 GMT -5
Already in another Fread
|
|
|
|
Post by ringoiceman on Jul 26, 2011 16:37:10 GMT -5
thank fuck he didnt make that, shit title , would chuck norris be on the album cover?
|
|
|
|
Post by aaronon on Jul 26, 2011 16:41:18 GMT -5
Awk that article appeared new  Sorry guys. Posting stuff on the iPhone took me a half hour. As well as logging in and I didn't spot the other thread. I quite like the title |
|
|
|
Post by The Morning Son on Jul 26, 2011 16:41:55 GMT -5
Is there an echo in here these days?
Everything has multiple threads
|
|
|
|
Post by cloudburster on Jul 26, 2011 18:01:21 GMT -5
Why do people get so angry about new threads? Just don't read it, simples
|
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Jul 26, 2011 21:04:50 GMT -5
Why do people get so angry about new threads? Just don't read it, simples It clutters up the board. And some people may post good insight in one of the threads, so it would be daft to overlook the new threads on the same topic. Thus it's more work, more reading, and more time consumed trying to find out if the thread has some inherit value. Just look at what's been posted before you post. Simples. |
|
Sorry guys. 
