|
|
Post by heathenchemistry02 on Jul 7, 2011 12:10:04 GMT -5
I tried searching this out, wouldn't work, kept getting an error. I just read this, and it's terribly bland www.rollingstone.com/music/albumreviews/different-gear-still-speeding-20110301I was very dissapointed. All it says is they are missing Noel's lyrics and a couple songs sound like The Beatles. No insight at all. Some people go by what this idiotic publication says... I don't. I find interest in what RS says, but DO NOT go by it as a model. Anyone else find RS just pissing you off? |
|
|
|
Post by CFC2013 on Jul 7, 2011 12:38:08 GMT -5
Rolling Stone hates Oasis/Noel and Liam. I don't know why. Did they snub them when they were bitching at each other in the 1990's? Are they just full of washed up pricks who still dream of the Rolling Stones and The Beatles?
|
|
|
|
Post by space75gr on Jul 7, 2011 12:40:50 GMT -5
rolling stone is crap.
|
|
|
|
Post by heathenchemistry02 on Jul 7, 2011 13:01:22 GMT -5
Yes thank you, I'm glad someone thinks close to the same.
They gave Oasis album good reviews though... they just sleighted DOYS and SOTSOG a bit
|
|
|
|
Post by thuperthonic on Jul 7, 2011 13:21:44 GMT -5
Some people go by what this idiotic publication says... I don't. No one goes by what Rolling Stone says. Have you ever met anyone who said, "I bought this because Rolling Stone said it was great"? No. Because there is no such person. |
|
zoso97
Oasis Roadie
Posts: 125
|
Post by zoso97 on Jul 8, 2011 12:01:03 GMT -5
a washed up rag that tries to suck trendy ass....have never purchased an issue and never will....and dont get me started on Yawn Notawinner and the Rock N Roll Hall of Shame bullshit....
|
|
face
Madferrit Fan
Posts: 90
|
Post by face on Jul 8, 2011 14:21:06 GMT -5
That's actually a good review, considering the album is complete horse shit.
|
|
|
|
Post by Frodis on Jul 8, 2011 15:51:26 GMT -5
Rolling Stone hates Oasis/Noel and Liam. I don't know why. Did they snub them when they were bitching at each other in the 1990's? Are they just full of washed up pricks who still dream of the Rolling Stones and The Beatles? Dunno if this was meant to be a rhetorical question or not but.. No. RS gave them a cover back in either late 1995 or early 1996 and a large article.  |
|
|
|
Post by heathenchemistry02 on Jul 8, 2011 17:12:23 GMT -5
nice little photo... and to what someone else said...
they are people out there, that will read a album review online or in a magazine,and it will make them not want to buy the album
so yeah people do read it...
but people shouldn't
|
|
|
|
Post by gdforever on Jul 8, 2011 17:17:09 GMT -5
I remember reading a large article in a Rolling Stone from the 90's. It was a large article...but not very complimentary really.
|
|
|
|
Post by Frodis on Jul 8, 2011 19:51:21 GMT -5
I remember reading a large article in a Rolling Stone from the 90's. It was a large article...but not very complimentary really. Its been so long since I've read that article, I forget whether it was complimentary or not. I think I remember Noel bitching about it from a few years ago (mostly about the tagline on the cover). |
|
|
|
Post by Let It Bleed on Jul 8, 2011 20:00:28 GMT -5
I remember reading a large article in a Rolling Stone from the 90's. It was a large article...but not very complimentary really. Its been so long since I've read that article, I forget whether it was complimentary or not. I think I remember Noel bitching about it from a few years ago (mostly about the tagline on the cover). hi Frodis. i remember that article. i don't rememer what it said either really but i doubt it was that bad, it came out when Oasis were at their peak in the u.s.a. and Rolling Stone always latches onto the flavor of the month. |
|
|
|
Post by thuperthonic on Jul 8, 2011 21:12:25 GMT -5
It was basically just a criticism of the Gallagher brothers with barely a mention of the music.
|
|
|
|
Post by XTRMNTRSCREAM on Jul 8, 2011 21:14:18 GMT -5
david frickie loves them and he is the editor.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lennon2217 on Jul 13, 2011 12:13:18 GMT -5
If memory serves correct there was a lot of tension with that Rolling Stone cover magazine shoot from 1996. Liam showed up late (naturally), the band was moody, it lasted about 20 minutes and when told by Rolling Stone what an honor it is to be on the cover and to take it serious, Liam replied "We don't need Rolling Stone. Rolling Stone needs us!". I'm pretty sure that comment along with the difficulty of the photo shoot lead to a Rolling Stone backlash that has lasted well over 12-15 years now.
Who cares about Rolling Stone magazine anyway. Nobody takes that publication seriously anymore. Probably not since the 70s. In the words of Jeff Bebe from Almost Famous:
"He looks harmless, but he does represent the magazine that trashed 'Layla', broke up Cream, ripped every album Led Zeppelin ever made."
|
|
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5