|
Post by webm@ster on Oct 17, 2003 8:34:38 GMT -5
When they first emerged, people noted that the Strokes bore a surprising similarity to Definitely Maybe-era Oasis. Their best ideas were all nicked, but sharp songwriting and a fantastic image elevated them beyond mere copyists. Two years later, the comparison still seems apposite. Like the Gallaghers' second effort, (What's the Story) Morning Glory, Room on Fire is an album that appears to punch above its weight. A roaring opener, a trio of great potential singles and a remarkable slow number successfully divert attention from the fact that half of Room on Fire is uninspired filler. The Strokes have managed to come up with just 15 minutes of decent music in two years, but you wouldn't notice while 12:51 or Under Control is playing.
Room on Fire is liable to shift more copies than Is This It, for precisely the same reasons that the second Oasis album outsold Definitely Maybe. The band's public profile is higher this time around. Since the Strokes' debut, no guitar band has emerged to challenge their dominance over alt-rock: the Libertines are too complex and messy and no one knows if the Darkness are a joke that's about to wear thin. In the absence of any serious alternative, audiences and media alike still want the Strokes to be successful, so success seems assured. For the time being at least, the Strokes have just about got away with it. If they can do so again in the future is anyone's guess.
source: the Guardian
|
|
|
Post by chocolate st*rfish on Oct 17, 2003 10:40:48 GMT -5
hm, very interesting note ... thx J.R.
|
|
Aiste
Oasis Roadie
Posts: 157
|
Post by Aiste on Oct 20, 2003 7:31:35 GMT -5
i personally find them boring and monotonous. those new bands, they lack personality, originality and identity, smth special. they're all alright, they all play good music and look stylish, i love some of them but none of them are very notable
|
|
rkid256
Oasis Roadie
We're all part of a masterplan...
Posts: 110
|
Post by rkid256 on Oct 21, 2003 9:44:26 GMT -5
And Oasis don't begin with 'The'
|
|
|
Post by thebeerbaron1 on Oct 23, 2003 16:31:41 GMT -5
who said that?
the stokes are massively overated!
its the "next big thing" syndrome.
everyone is too scared to say that they are shit incase they are deemed uncool!
me, i dont care about being uncool!
the stokes are shit.
|
|
|
Post by thebeerbaron1 on Oct 23, 2003 16:35:23 GMT -5
i also think "the holy darkness" are shit also! love the visuals though.
radio 1 are hyping them as the next queen and everyone falls in behind that view.
a stageshow can only take you so far. look at kiss.
|
|
|
Post by Rain on Oct 24, 2003 12:53:57 GMT -5
i personally find them boring and monotonous. those new bands, they lack personality, originality and identity, smth special. they're all alright, they all play good music and look stylish, i love some of them but none of them are very notable I agree with you babe
|
|
|
Post by thebeerbaron1 on Oct 26, 2003 17:18:30 GMT -5
And Oasis don't begin with 'The' so true!
|
|
|
Post by mîcCỵOrRIe on Oct 30, 2003 2:11:28 GMT -5
last night is catchy
|
|
|
Post by thebeerbaron1 on Nov 2, 2003 17:22:30 GMT -5
catchy in a shit sort of way? or catchy in a skeeter boy sort of way???
|
|
|
Post by thebeerbaron1 on Nov 2, 2003 17:32:23 GMT -5
do you think the webmaster lifts these chunks of quotes just to wind everyone up?
curse that copy n paste button! microsoft is evil.
|
|
|
Post by Tomo on Nov 7, 2003 13:16:39 GMT -5
The Strokes are crap. Their tunes sound like a load of frying pans falling over and a four year old kid playing an out of tune guitar.
|
|