|
Post by webm@ster on May 4, 2003 11:40:38 GMT -5
............But, then, Blur always had more adventurous tendencies than many gave it credit for. While the 12-year-old group has been acknowledged as a pioneer of the mid-'90s Brit-pop trend, it never rocked as conventionally as its rival bands in that movement, such as Oasis or Supergrass. Albarn and his crew have long had a taste for cockeyed sounds and eccentric production tricks. ................. long article in the newsroom : www.live4ever.us/newsroom.html
|
|
|
Post by chocolate st*rfish on May 5, 2003 7:01:15 GMT -5
they're right. the new album sux
|
|
|
Post by chocolate st*rfish on May 5, 2003 8:12:08 GMT -5
the funny thing is: damon recently admitted that oasis were much better on stage than him. he reckoned that he was never able to perform that well...
|
|
NoelyG
Oasis Roadie
Posts: 434
|
Post by NoelyG on May 6, 2003 13:21:40 GMT -5
Theyre no oasis at all
Im buying the new album tomorrow. Dunno what im expecting really. I like "Out of Time"
|
|
|
Post by chocolate st*rfish on May 6, 2003 14:20:21 GMT -5
don't expect too much, but if yer like OOT then ya might get into the tunes after a while..
|
|
|
Post by drunkbyname on Sept 9, 2003 10:52:30 GMT -5
Blur are crap. All they produce nowadays are boring alternative rubbish. Their only good song was Song 2, but since then it's all been utter drivel.
|
|
|
Post by webm@ster on Sept 9, 2003 10:54:56 GMT -5
Blur are crap. All they produce nowadays are boring alternative rubbish. Their only good song was Song 2, but since then it's all been utter drivel. welcome to the forum drunkbyname !
|
|
|
Post by mape on Sept 9, 2003 20:24:19 GMT -5
my hatred of blur distorts my judgement on their music. they gained huge success off oasis. without the rivalry they'd still be an obscure background band
|
|