Lundblad
Oasis Roadie
Nothing ever lasts forever
Posts: 476
|
Post by Lundblad on Feb 1, 2011 9:44:56 GMT -5
Let us collect all reviews for the album here, and update the list as new ones come flowing in: This far: kingjohn - 8,5/10 Q - 4/5 Mojo - 3/5 Uncut - 3/5 maninthecornershop - 7,5/10 Muziek.nl (NET) - 4/5 The Fly - 2/5 FHM - 4/5 Loaded - 5/5 BBC - Overall positive Virgin.com - 5/10 ExploreMusic - 3/5 M is for Music - 3.5/5 Nuts - 7/10 NME - 7/10 RTE TEN (IRE) - 3/5 The Telegraph - 3/5 Cleveland Leader - Very Positive Daily Mail - 4/5 The Sun - 4/5 All Music Guide - 4/5 SPIN - 7/10 Focus Online (GER) - 6/10 Der Spiegel (GER) - 5/10 musicheadquarter.de (GER) - 9/10 MusicOMH - 3/5 All-Noise - 8/10 Rolling Stone (GER) - 4/5 Contactmusik - 1/10 Rolling Stone - 2,5/5 Clarin.com (ARG) - Positive Montreal Mirror (CAN) - 3/10 Daily Mirror - Overall positive Crave Online - 4/10 Guardian - Middle of the road, kinda The Music Fix - 6/10 The Arts Desk - More negative than positive? The Independent (Andy Gill) - 3/5 The Independent (Sim Price) - Very negative This Is London - 3/5 Toronto Sun (CAN) - 3,5/5 Bonus: Swedish media: Aftonbladet - 2/5 Västerbottens Folkblad - 2/5 Värmlands Folkblad - 2/5 Nöjesguiden 4/6 Dagens Nyheter 3/5 Gaffa 2/5 Göteborgsposten 3/5 Joyzine 3/5 NWT 3/5 Kristianstadsbladet 3/5 Svenska Dagbladet 3/6 Västerbottenskuriren 2/5 Sonic - 4/10 (updated 3rd March) |
|
|
|
Post by putthisin ® on Feb 1, 2011 10:11:24 GMT -5
Can someone update the wikipedia DGSS page and put musiek.nl score?? It's good publicity to have good ratings in there.
|
|
|
|
Post by deasy on Feb 1, 2011 10:16:42 GMT -5
Can someone update the wikipedia DGSS page and put musiek.nl score?? It's good publicity to have good ratings in there. Done |
|
|
|
Post by lucahelvetica on Feb 1, 2011 14:41:29 GMT -5
Theres another review in the facts and fiction section that gives it 7.5 out of 10
|
|
|
|
Post by Beadasis on Feb 1, 2011 23:02:28 GMT -5
Shouldn't kingjohn's rating be added to wikipedia also?  |
|
|
|
Post by putthisin ® on Feb 7, 2011 10:14:55 GMT -5
kingjohn - 8,5/10
Q - 4/5
Mojo - 3/5
Uncut - 3/5
Muziek.nl - 4/5
The Fly - 2/5
FHM - 4/5
Loaded - 5/5
|
|
|
|
Post by psj3809 on Feb 7, 2011 11:21:35 GMT -5
Has anyone got the urls to these reviews ? Couldnt seem to find the King John one.
Cant believe Loaded is still going ?!
|
|
|
|
Post by Beadasis on Feb 7, 2011 15:35:12 GMT -5
On Wikipedia, it says FHM gave it 5/5 and Loaded gave it 4/5. Which is right? |
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Sifter on Feb 7, 2011 15:44:35 GMT -5
On Wikipedia, it days FHM gave it 5/5 and Loaded gave it 4/5. Which is right? It was Loaded that gave the 5/5 review, should be fixed now... |
|
Lundblad
Oasis Roadie
Nothing ever lasts forever
Posts: 476
|
Post by Lundblad on Feb 8, 2011 7:10:31 GMT -5
Updated the start post, and added maninthecornershop's review as well.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 8, 2011 7:19:53 GMT -5
Only good reviews on wikipedia now! That'll teach em'  |
|
Lundblad
Oasis Roadie
Nothing ever lasts forever
Posts: 476
|
Post by Lundblad on Feb 25, 2011 8:18:42 GMT -5
Updated.
|
|
|
|
Post by Swarfiga on Feb 25, 2011 9:48:46 GMT -5
Swedish music magazine Sonic; 4/10
You have to see this positively.
Oasis stop, the whole group minus Noel Gallagher goes on and do something completely different. Something new. It is the last piece we will concentrate on. As Gallagher, the elderly accounted for the most important factor in Oasis (and there were quite a few), it is actually pretending that Beady Eye is a whole new group.
So, we Suppose Liam Gallagher, Andy Bell from Ride and the other two that you never remember the names of an entirely new, untested configuration. They called beady eye, and this is their debut. It is possible, if there is an effort. So how does the debut of this new band? Nothing further.
A song title like "the Beatles and Stones" speaks for itself, but the funny thing is that beady eye never end up really close to the two given sixty giants. Instead, let "Different Gear, Still Speeding" as a disc recorded by a dull The Who cover band.
Which means straight up and down rock with windmill riffs and heavy The Ox-bass lines. Nothing is more exciting, all ticks in the same well beaten pen where Liam Gallagher amble throughout his life.
What is most surprising is that he sounds more negative and angry, as he has nothing to prove on his own (he has).
Beady Eye coats on without any nerve, but necessity. "For Anyone" is a nice little trifle, opening "Four Letter Word" will sound superb live.
The rest? Hmm. It's never really bad. Just sad. Uninteresting. Lyrically, it's a disaster. When will Noel's solo album?
|
|
|
|
Post by bonkers on Feb 25, 2011 15:41:36 GMT -5
daily mail gave it 4/5
|
|
|
|
Post by Marcos on Feb 25, 2011 21:37:09 GMT -5
Swedish music magazine Sonic; 4/10 You have to see this positively. Oasis stop, the whole group minus Noel Gallagher goes on and do something completely different. Something new. It is the last piece we will concentrate on. As Gallagher, the elderly accounted for the most important factor in Oasis (and there were quite a few), it is actually pretending that Beady Eye is a whole new group. So, we Suppose Liam Gallagher, Andy Bell from Ride and the other two that you never remember the names of an entirely new, untested configuration. They called beady eye, and this is their debut. It is possible, if there is an effort. So how does the debut of this new band? Nothing further. A song title like "the Beatles and Stones" speaks for itself, but the funny thing is that beady eye never end up really close to the two given sixty giants. Instead, let "Different Gear, Still Speeding" as a disc recorded by a dull The Who cover band. Which means straight up and down rock with windmill riffs and heavy The Ox-bass lines. Nothing is more exciting, all ticks in the same well beaten pen where Liam Gallagher amble throughout his life. "A song title like Beatles and Stones speaks for itself What is most surprising is that he sounds more negative and angry, as he has nothing to prove on his own (he has). Beady Eye coats on without any nerve, but necessity. "For Anyone" is a nice little trifle, opening "Four Letter Word" will sound superb live. The rest? Hmm. It's never really bad. Just sad. Uninteresting. Lyrically, it's a disaster. When will Noel's solo album? This is pathetic! I'm not saying they sould've loved the album but this review is really unfair. "A song title like "the Beatles and Stones" speaks for itself". Very nice, they don't like the song title so the song is shit. What a great reviewer! |
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Sifter on Feb 25, 2011 22:06:55 GMT -5
Swedish music magazine Sonic; 4/10 You have to see this positively. Oasis stop, the whole group minus Noel Gallagher goes on and do something completely different. Something new. It is the last piece we will concentrate on. As Gallagher, the elderly accounted for the most important factor in Oasis (and there were quite a few), it is actually pretending that Beady Eye is a whole new group. So, we Suppose Liam Gallagher, Andy Bell from Ride and the other two that you never remember the names of an entirely new, untested configuration. They called beady eye, and this is their debut. It is possible, if there is an effort. So how does the debut of this new band? Nothing further. A song title like "the Beatles and Stones" speaks for itself, but the funny thing is that beady eye never end up really close to the two given sixty giants. Instead, let "Different Gear, Still Speeding" as a disc recorded by a dull The Who cover band. Which means straight up and down rock with windmill riffs and heavy The Ox-bass lines. Nothing is more exciting, all ticks in the same well beaten pen where Liam Gallagher amble throughout his life. "A song title like Beatles and Stones speaks for itself What is most surprising is that he sounds more negative and angry, as he has nothing to prove on his own (he has). Beady Eye coats on without any nerve, but necessity. "For Anyone" is a nice little trifle, opening "Four Letter Word" will sound superb live. The rest? Hmm. It's never really bad. Just sad. Uninteresting. Lyrically, it's a disaster. When will Noel's solo album? This is pathetic! I'm not saying they sould've loved the album but this review is really unfair. "A song title like "the Beatles and Stones" speaks for itself". Very nice, they don't like the song title so the song is shit. What a great reviewer! Every swedish review is basically shit, not only the Oasis related ones. But here it seems to be accepted, and in some cases embraced, to hate a band or artist that your'e reviewing. And that seems to be the case with every Oasis review, and now Beady Eye, since BHN (Wich most critics loved then, but has bashed as one of the worst albums in history these last few years). 2/5 is about the same as every oasis album since 1997, exept for HC, the album where everybody jumped on the fuckin' bandwagon and said the boys were back to form. Makes me hate that album even more!  |
|
|
|
Post by jlzoasis on Feb 26, 2011 0:31:01 GMT -5
Nice one not putting the jackass from Contact music in there  |
|
|
|
Post by Silence Dogood on Feb 26, 2011 0:43:49 GMT -5
who is contactmusic anyway(i am being 100% serious)
|
|
|
|
Post by galli1986 on Feb 26, 2011 3:38:43 GMT -5
who the heck is sweden?!? Im being serious;) oasis sold like 25k albums there every few years. they love mando diao and the hives in sweden, that speaks for itself imo.
cheers
|
|
Lundblad
Oasis Roadie
Nothing ever lasts forever
Posts: 476
|
Post by Lundblad on Feb 26, 2011 5:21:45 GMT -5
All the Swedish reviewers are very influenced by the ironic style of Pitchfork. Horrendously useless. Was contactmusic the 1/10 review? I actually forgot about to put it there |
|
pascal
Oasis Roadie
Posts: 152
|
Post by pascal on Feb 26, 2011 8:12:28 GMT -5
RS germany gave it 4/5 stars
|
|
|
|
Post by lukeyg83 on Feb 26, 2011 9:42:18 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by beadyeyeunofficial on Feb 26, 2011 9:45:28 GMT -5
The Stevenage Gazette said it was more entertaining than the Chuckle Brothers' Christmas Panto 1987.
|
|
|
|
Post by gaspanic23 on Feb 26, 2011 11:17:49 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by doggboy10 on Feb 27, 2011 5:00:03 GMT -5
The news of the world gives it a positive review today, 4 out of 5 stars and says: Liam can thrive without Noel and this proves it. With more variety than than any of oasis's last albums and with Liam singing properly again. It's a colourful journey through rocks past with an energy that's bang upto date..............spot on that for me, exactly my thoughts on the album & beady eye
|
|
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5