|
|
Post by Mr. Monobrow on Jan 31, 2011 10:41:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Rolo on Jan 31, 2011 10:44:57 GMT -5
Cheers Mono.
|
|
|
|
Post by gaspanic23 on Jan 31, 2011 10:46:15 GMT -5
Could you upload it on 4shared or any other website please? I can't access avaxhome :/
|
|
|
|
Post by King Blougaredoc on Jan 31, 2011 10:51:45 GMT -5
The leak is inminent
|
|
|
|
Post by putthisin ® on Jan 31, 2011 11:14:41 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by alwaysnow on Jan 31, 2011 11:15:28 GMT -5
^ Thanks a million for that!
|
|
|
|
Post by BEng on Jan 31, 2011 11:43:20 GMT -5
Good review, but weird music taste. It mentions BTL as a highlight that can't be surpassed by anything on the album. It calls FLW "not a bad song but misguided fanfare" ...."things do, however, quickly get better" (than mentioning Millionaire.) They don't even mention the (as far as we're concerned) "more epic" second part of the album. Nothing about Wigwam, Beat goes on, Morning son...  So in my view this is only a review of half the album  It gets 3 stars and the album is called "pretty exciting to listen to". It seems like the album really is going to be on par with the last Oasis albums, which is much better as we all expected in advance!! |
|
|
|
Post by gaspanic23 on Jan 31, 2011 11:53:26 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by liamisgod125 on Jan 31, 2011 12:15:20 GMT -5
yep looks like hes only reviewing the first half..bit of a shame.
|
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Jan 31, 2011 13:17:16 GMT -5
Pretty poor (and by poor, I mean the review itself) review. Lacks description by not mentioning the second half of the album, and isn't consistent in it's thinking considering "things quickly get better" but only justify that statement by mentioning only 2 tunes.
I'd take Q's review over this one (even if Q had it at the same star count, the Q review is much more informative.
|
|
|
|
Post by gaspanic23 on Jan 31, 2011 13:21:40 GMT -5
I'd take Q's review over this one (even if Q had it at the same star count, the Q review is much more informative. That's MOJO, mate. Q gave it 4 stars I believe. |
|
|
|
Post by vespa on Jan 31, 2011 14:03:44 GMT -5
you have to remember bring the light to the common listener is a great uptempo and refreshing song an everyone i know that as heard it loves it but ive a feeling the common listener will love this album,full of tunes
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Monobrow on Jan 31, 2011 14:06:53 GMT -5
you have to remember bring the light to the common listener is a great uptempo and refreshing song an everyone i know that as heard it loves it but ive a feeling the common listener will love this album,full of tunes The common listener won't give a fuck, bar some massive single rocking it into people's heads 'Angels' style. This is as low key as it will get for any Oasis related album release. |
|
|
|
Post by vespa on Jan 31, 2011 14:10:28 GMT -5
well see when the albums released but i know alot of common listeners that have heard bring the light and if ya talking low key release,then def maybe was back in 94 till people realised the quality .this album will be pretty big
|
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Monobrow on Jan 31, 2011 15:34:08 GMT -5
well see when the albums released but i know alot of common listeners that have heard bring the light and if ya talking low key release,then def maybe was back in 94 till people realised the quality .this album will be pretty big Definitely Maybe was the biggest selling debut album in it's first week of sale. There was hype in the NME/Melody Maker from the moment they signed for Creation. Plus British guitar music was far, far bigger than it is now. The Roller only sold 10,000 copies in a time when it's never been quicker, easier and cheaper to buy a single. Would be amazed if it sold half the numbers of the lowest selling Oasis record. |
|
|
|
Post by gdforever on Jan 31, 2011 15:48:33 GMT -5
well see when the albums released but i know alot of common listeners that have heard bring the light and if ya talking low key release,then def maybe was back in 94 till people realised the quality .this album will be pretty big If you expect this album to be on the level of Definitely Maybe and for that alone to carry it to the top of the charts...I fear that you are in for a disappointment. Noone is saying this album is better than the first 2...best they've said is better than the last 4-5 albums. (other than maybe Liam) Plus, I think, Oasis in the beginning had done a lot to get that momentum going. They had played in clubs for years before the album dropped. They had built a bit of a ground swell of anticipation. BDI had early Oasis beat all over in media access. But early Oasis had a different type of hype working in their favour...that of being tipped as the next big thing. The question isn't if you play BTL to people whether they will like it. It's an inoffensive tune. The worst I can say is that it's average. The question is will anyone hear their songs and think they have to get that album because they need that tune. All of those people that you guys have played BTL to...how many of them have said or implied that they wanted to buy the album when it came out because of it? What they need is a big single to bring people to the album. We have heard 3 tunes so far and none have been the tune to solidify them in the big times. I, personally hope that TBGO is that tune judging by the way it's being talked about. |
|
|
|
Post by tomlivesforever on Jan 31, 2011 16:23:34 GMT -5
Its never gonna be as good as the first 2 Oasis records or have the same impact, I just don't think its possible. However if its better than the last few Oasis albums (and I really like DBTT and DOYS) then I'll be a happy man.
As for the review, since he only mentioned half the songs i'd say its a pretty poor one. Not as good as the others we've had thus far.
|
|
|
|
Post by Beadasis on Jan 31, 2011 16:54:17 GMT -5
Are there any reviews out there besides the ones from Q, Mojo, and Uncut, or is that it so far?
|
|
|
|
Post by thuperthonic on Jan 31, 2011 16:55:11 GMT -5
I would sincerely bet money that not a single non-Oasis fan in the entire world decided, upon hearing Bring The Light, that they needed to buy this album.
|
|
|
|
Post by mimmihopps on Jan 31, 2011 17:22:58 GMT -5
Thanks Mr. Mono and putthisin.  |
|
|
|
Post by Mr. Monobrow on Jan 31, 2011 17:30:42 GMT -5
Are there any reviews out there besides the ones from Q, Mojo, and Uncut, or is that it so far? The Spanish edition of Rolling Stone gave it 3/5, but there was barely any content in the review (100 or so words), just a comparison to the Faces and Lennon's Double Fantasy. |
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Jan 31, 2011 18:32:00 GMT -5
I'd take Q's review over this one (even if Q had it at the same star count, the Q review is much more informative. That's MOJO, mate. Q gave it 4 stars I believe. No. I know. I was saying if Q hypothetically gave it 3 stars instead, the written part is still better. UNCUT's review was pretty bland. |
|
|
|
Post by andymorris on Jan 31, 2011 18:46:37 GMT -5
it's like he forgot to write a second part for his review. Weird.
|
|
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5