|
|
Post by cliffriff on Jan 7, 2011 17:11:56 GMT -5
..is their work ethic.
It turns out Liam actually meant it when he said he wanted to do an album a year like the beatles did. All the DOYS intevriews he kept saying he wanted to go right back in and record and NOel said he wanted 5 years off. 5 YEARS! that puts him at almost 50 yrs old..
so although our favorite band broke up:
-we still have the good chance they will reunite.
-Liam and co. are actually following thru on their word. made an album in 2 months. and have released 3 songs and as many videos. BEFORE the album.
- and if there wasnt that oasis greatest hits album, im sure we'd already have the beady eye album in our hands
anyway, it seems like they still have that fire in them. and noel is really burned out. he seemed really tired and over it , in my opinion, during the DOYS tour. almost angry at times. so his solo album should be amazing and a good revitalizer for him. then after maybe one more beady eye album and tour, then id imagine oasis reunite in 2015-2016. possible owen morris back on board? haha even if they never do reunite. i could live relatively happy with Noel solo albums and beady eye till they all call it a day
|
|
|
|
Post by Marcos on Jan 7, 2011 17:15:21 GMT -5
I'm guessing their plans is to release the second album in late 2012. That'd be epic! So far their marketing strategy has been spot on.
|
|
|
|
Post by alcoholiclemonhaze on Jan 7, 2011 17:16:47 GMT -5
Spot on. It's always struck me as though Noel was the lazy one. Perhaps lazy is the wrong word, but not as eager to get albums out - as Liam seems to be.
|
|
|
|
Post by Guy Fawkes on Jan 7, 2011 17:21:45 GMT -5
Spot on. It's always struck me as though Noel was the lazy one. Perhaps lazy is the wrong word, but not as eager to get albums out - as Liam seems to be. i think the words you're looking for are 'realistic' and 'wise'. |
|
|
|
Post by cliffriff on Jan 7, 2011 17:25:01 GMT -5
Spot on. It's always struck me as though Noel was the lazy one. Perhaps lazy is the wrong word, but not as eager to get albums out - as Liam seems to be. i think the words you're looking for are 'realistic' and 'wise'. He is realistic and wise, but not becasue he wants 5 years off between albums. the beatles realeased 3 albums in 1965. if this makes them non realistic and wise, let me be that as well |
|
|
|
Post by putthisin ® on Jan 7, 2011 17:28:30 GMT -5
Spot on. It's always struck me as though Noel was the lazy one. Perhaps lazy is the wrong word, but not as eager to get albums out - as Liam seems to be. i think the words you're looking for are 'realistic' and 'wise'. Explain, LIB. He has enough songs for half a dozen of albums. |
|
|
|
Post by alcoholiclemonhaze on Jan 7, 2011 17:28:47 GMT -5
i think the words you're looking for are 'realistic' and 'wise'. He is realistic and wise, but not becasue he wants 5 years off between albums. the beatles realeased 3 albums in 1965. if this makes them non realistic and wise, let me be that as well Exactly, Bob Dylan released 3 classic albums in 18months. Each to there own, but i think its all about how much you want it. And by the way, i love Noel as much as the next man (not in a gay way)... |
|
|
|
Post by Guy Fawkes on Jan 7, 2011 17:31:18 GMT -5
i think the words you're looking for are 'realistic' and 'wise'. He is realistic and wise, but not becasue he wants 5 years off between albums. the beatles realeased 3 albums in 1965. if this makes them non realistic and wise, let me be that as well the Beatles were an anamoly. no one has lived up to that pace except the Stones in the late 60's to early 70's. |
|
|
|
Post by alcoholiclemonhaze on Jan 7, 2011 17:33:35 GMT -5
He is realistic and wise, but not becasue he wants 5 years off between albums. the beatles realeased 3 albums in 1965. if this makes them non realistic and wise, let me be that as well the Beatles were an anamoly. no one has lived up to that pace except the Stones in the late 60's to early 70's. Highway 61, Bringing it on back and blonde on blonde beg to differ. They might not be everyone's cup of tea but critics would argue otherwise. |
|
|
|
Post by cliffriff on Jan 7, 2011 17:36:21 GMT -5
He is realistic and wise, but not becasue he wants 5 years off between albums. the beatles realeased 3 albums in 1965. if this makes them non realistic and wise, let me be that as well the Beatles were an anamoly. no one has lived up to that pace except the Stones in the late 60's to early 70's. So would that make Ryan Adams, Weezer(nowadays) anamolies as well? without even haveing to think about it i thought of these, there are so so many bands that release albums every years. especially in the 60s. 5 years is just too long. its what rage against the machine did and i really dislike that release schedule. if you were together for 15 years and have 3 albums its embarrassing id say |
|
|
|
Post by Guy Fawkes on Jan 7, 2011 17:37:23 GMT -5
the Beatles were an anamoly. no one has lived up to that pace except the Stones in the late 60's to early 70's. Highway 61, Bringing it on back and blonde on blonde beg to differ. They might not be everyone's cup of tea but critics would argue otherwise. i like Bob Dylan ok, those are great albums. but the stones release of 'let it bleed, 'sticky fingers' and 'exile on main street' is better in my opinion. |
|
|
|
Post by Guy Fawkes on Jan 7, 2011 17:39:13 GMT -5
i think the words you're looking for are 'realistic' and 'wise'. Explain, LIB. He has enough songs for half a dozen of albums. i don't think he did, or he would've released them. |
|
|
|
Post by alcoholiclemonhaze on Jan 7, 2011 17:40:12 GMT -5
Highway 61, Bringing it on back and blonde on blonde beg to differ. They might not be everyone's cup of tea but critics would argue otherwise. i like Bob Dylan ok, those are great albums. but the stones release of 'let it bleed, 'sticky fingers' and 'exile on main street' is better in my opinion. I agree with ya, my only point was that it shouldn't take so long between alums, and I like the fact Liam is eager to produce music on a regular basis. |
|
|
|
Post by Guy Fawkes on Jan 7, 2011 17:43:02 GMT -5
the Beatles were an anamoly. no one has lived up to that pace except the Stones in the late 60's to early 70's. So would that make Ryan Adams, Weezer(nowadays) anamolies as well? without even haveing to think about it i thought of these, there are so so many bands that release albums every years. especially in the 60s. 5 years is just too long. its what rage against the machine did and i really dislike that release schedule. if you were together for 15 years and have 3 albums its embarrassing id say no that wouldn't make Ryan Adams and Weezer anomalies. i don't think Ryan Adams or Weezer are unusual, unique, or really really great for that matter. |
|
|
|
Post by Guy Fawkes on Jan 7, 2011 17:47:36 GMT -5
i like Bob Dylan ok, those are great albums. but the stones release of 'let it bleed, 'sticky fingers' and 'exile on main street' is better in my opinion. I agree with ya, my only point was that it shouldn't take so long between alums, and I like the fact Liam is eager to produce music on a regular basis. there's no fixed schedule for creating. if it isn't happening or the material isn't that great, why release it? |
|
rkidcd
Oasis Roadie
Posts: 143
|
Post by rkidcd on Jan 7, 2011 17:47:59 GMT -5
Although on the day it happened I was gutted, oasis splitting up is the best thing to have ever happened, and I'll stand by that.
Noal was holding the rest of the band back, the rest of the band were holding noal back.
|
|
|
|
Post by cliffriff on Jan 7, 2011 17:48:15 GMT -5
So would that make Ryan Adams, Weezer(nowadays) anamolies as well? without even haveing to think about it i thought of these, there are so so many bands that release albums every years. especially in the 60s. 5 years is just too long. its what rage against the machine did and i really dislike that release schedule. if you were together for 15 years and have 3 albums its embarrassing id say no that wouldn't make Ryan Adams and Weezer anomalies. i don't think Ryan Adams or Weezer are unusual, unique, or really really great for that matter. honestly who cares, but you do realize you 100% contradicted yourself in those two opening sentences right? YOu said they are anomalies ( definition:any occurrence or object that is strange, unusual, or unique. ) then saud they arent unusual or unique.. hmmm.. anyway, i think you can safely say the average wait between albums nowadays is 2 years. Sometimes 3. in the 60s it was an album every year. this was the norm. and 5 years off between albums is in fact an anomaly |
|
|
|
Post by Guy Fawkes on Jan 7, 2011 17:50:22 GMT -5
plus they have to promote the albums and all, that gets old. i've spent too much time in oasis related sections/threads today. i'm going back to the lounge.
|
|
|
|
Post by Guy Fawkes on Jan 7, 2011 17:52:07 GMT -5
no that wouldn't make Ryan Adams and Weezer anomalies. i don't think Ryan Adams or Weezer are unusual, unique, or really really great for that matter. honestly who cares, but you do realize you 100% contradicted yourself in those two opening sentences right? YOu said they are anomalies ( definition:any occurrence or object that is strange, unusual, or unique. ) then saud they arent unusual or unique.. hmmm.. i never said Ryan Adams and Weezer were anomalies. |
|
|
|
Post by alcoholiclemonhaze on Jan 7, 2011 17:52:28 GMT -5
I agree with ya, my only point was that it shouldn't take so long between alums, and I like the fact Liam is eager to produce music on a regular basis. there's no fixed schedule for creating. if it isn't happening or the material isn't that great, why release it? Although I agree with that to a point, some of the songs we have heard suggest otherwise. Noel's sound check songs and The Roller suggest they had very very good tunes in their locker and waiting to use - why not release more frequently. Noel has been a hoarder song wise, he head All Around the world written early on, and mythical songs like Slow (which have been deemed to be brilliant)... I just think that Oasis could have been more prolific album wise. |
|
|
|
Post by Guy Fawkes on Jan 7, 2011 17:59:05 GMT -5
no that wouldn't make Ryan Adams and Weezer anomalies. i don't think Ryan Adams or Weezer are unusual, unique, or really really great for that matter. honestly who cares, but you do realize you 100% contradicted yourself in those two opening sentences right? YOu said they are anomalies ( definition:any occurrence or object that is strange, unusual, or unique. ) then saud they arent unusual or unique.. hmmm.. anyway, i think you can safely say the average wait between albums nowadays is 2 years. Sometimes 3. in the 60s it was an album every year. this was the norm. and 5 years off between albums is in fact an anomaly maybe 'anomaly' isn't the right word. i forgot i'm in an Oasis/Beady Eye section of the forum where people are anal. maybe the word, or description is 'really fucking great', which Ryan Adams and Weezer aren't, God bless them but they aren't. they're good but not really fucking great. |
|
|
|
Post by cliffriff on Jan 7, 2011 18:26:23 GMT -5
honestly who cares, but you do realize you 100% contradicted yourself in those two opening sentences right? YOu said they are anomalies ( definition:any occurrence or object that is strange, unusual, or unique. ) then saud they arent unusual or unique.. hmmm.. i never said Ryan Adams and Weezer were anomalies. my bad, read it wrong |
|
|
|
Post by discworld on Jan 7, 2011 19:01:14 GMT -5
If I remember correctly, 5 years was the time for the next oasis album. Noel suggested that each member makes his solo album during this time and Liam told him to go fuck himself.
|
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Jan 7, 2011 19:10:19 GMT -5
If I remember correctly, 5 years was the time for the next oasis album. Noel suggested that each member makes his solo album during this time and Liam told him to go fuck himself. Going off of recent releasing patterns, Oasis would be gearing up (seriously, no pun intended) for their 8th album release now. It really is ashame that they aren't, but at least we got DGSS to look forward to - things could have been much more barren and thus much more worse |
|
|
|
Post by discworld on Jan 7, 2011 19:18:53 GMT -5
Until now, I have no reason to buy DGSS.
But it' not a problem, I have a lot of new (and old) albums to buy this year.
|
|
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5