|
|
Post by spaneli on Nov 10, 2010 5:36:06 GMT -5
FUCK YOU ALL. IT'S FUCKING AMAZING. Goto 'Checkout' in the top right hand corner of the emailed link. The MP3 will download that way a a zip with the wiget :-) ahahahaha, nice ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by oasis6 on Nov 10, 2010 5:36:09 GMT -5
To be clear for everyone: THIS IS NOT THE SINGLE! I think we all know that. As its a free download its not allowed to be in the charts or that. I just hope we do hear a new single soon in the next few weeks as this doesnt give me faith sadly Please clarify, I thought this was supposed to be the debut single? |
|
|
|
Post by petedaley on Nov 10, 2010 5:36:34 GMT -5
Whatever, man. I think it sounds pretty good, and I'm not too concerned about chart positions. It's nothing groundbreaking, but it's upbeat and rockin'. I'm expecting some better tunes, but this is good.
|
|
jrs40
Oasis Roadie
Posts: 400
|
Post by jrs40 on Nov 10, 2010 5:36:38 GMT -5
Gutted, what a let down.
|
|
|
|
Post by tomlivesforever on Nov 10, 2010 5:37:46 GMT -5
They don't have the same meaning, I suggest you check a dictionary. At the very least your mixing connotations ffs. mediocre-moderate quality, not very good. decent-respectable. moderate quality and respectable are about the same. Just looked that up. Don't try to act like a smart ass next time please. I didn't, i looked it up discovered you were wrong, which you are. And then pointed this out to you. Its not rocket science mate. |
|
|
|
Post by spaneli on Nov 10, 2010 5:37:53 GMT -5
I think we all know that. As its a free download its not allowed to be in the charts or that. I just hope we do hear a new single soon in the next few weeks as this doesnt give me faith sadly Please clarify, I thought this was supposed to be the debut single? The sad thing is that is what the general public thinks. Its gonna be real hard for them to pick up non Oasis fans. Most non-Oasis fans are going to slag this off as the worst first single ever, not knowing any better. |
|
|
|
Post by Rockin'chair23 on Nov 10, 2010 5:37:56 GMT -5
This has ruined my whole day now. I only hope it gets better but I'm not holding my breath
|
|
|
|
Post by danscouse on Nov 10, 2010 5:37:57 GMT -5
You're all wierdo's this song is fun and has more energy than the last 4 oasis albums put together, the backing vocals are inspired. Love it
|
|
|
|
Post by spaneli on Nov 10, 2010 5:39:52 GMT -5
mediocre-moderate quality, not very good. decent-respectable. moderate quality and respectable are about the same. Just looked that up. Don't try to act like a smart ass next time please. I didn't, i looked it up discovered you were wrong, which you are. And then pointed this out to you. Its not rocket science mate. Then I suggest you not use an online-dictionary. Okay mediocre and decent have the same meaning, except different connotations. Now stop arguing about something thats completely stupid because your wrong. Ask any English teacher and they'll tell you you're wrong. Or try being an English major. |
|
|
|
Post by supersonic1983 on Nov 10, 2010 5:40:18 GMT -5
It's not that bad. I honestly don't know what some of you were expecting. So it's not Oasis. If you want Oasis, then fucking listen to Oasis.
|
|
|
|
Post by RocketMan on Nov 10, 2010 5:40:51 GMT -5
everybody knows that this is a very disappointing track, there is no way of saying this is good, it's just awful. to be fair, the choir is quite good. but the rest sounds like a cover-band
|
|
ale2
Madferrit Fan
Posts: 61
|
Post by ale2 on Nov 10, 2010 5:40:55 GMT -5
You're all wierdo's this song is fun and has more energy than the last 4 oasis albums put together, the backing vocals are inspired. Love it Yea, right! Then I understand why you are here and not at Jerre Lee Lewis forum. The more I listen to it the more I hate it. Even the worst Oasissongs are much better than this shit. |
|
|
|
Post by spaneli on Nov 10, 2010 5:41:17 GMT -5
It's not that bad. I honestly don't know what some of you were expecting. So it's not Oasis. If you want Oasis, then fucking listen to Oasis. Me personally I wasnt looking for Oasis. I was looking for anything, but Oasis. Its just not that good. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 10, 2010 5:41:30 GMT -5
meh its decent i suppose 6/10 thinking about this as an album track im not dissopointed at all but i refuse to accept that this is the song the music video was made for that the dancer woman said was amazing. this has to be a vlad the impailer type appetiser thing..well hopefully anyway  |
|
|
|
Post by idledreamer on Nov 10, 2010 5:41:31 GMT -5
FUCK YOU ALL. IT'S FUCKING AMAZING. Goto 'Checkout' in the top right hand corner of the emailed link. The MP3 will download that way a a zip with wallpapers :-) THANK YOU bellboy... that worked great  V |
|
|
|
Post by bradhorse on Nov 10, 2010 5:41:59 GMT -5
The more I listen to it the more I like it. Lyrically it's pretty bad but the tune itself is pretty good I think
People going 'it's hardly Supersonic' are kidding themselves, were you actually expecting a song like that? This ISN'T Oasis, this is a band who has two members that joined and were writing under the impression that their songs must have an Oasis sound, now there is a new band and they are writing music in a style they all enjoy I imagine
If the lyrics in the chorus weren't 'Baby come on', which is just the most generic bullshit then i'd give this song a 9/10, as it is it's about a 7 or an 8
|
|
|
|
Post by spaneli on Nov 10, 2010 5:43:04 GMT -5
For me. 6.5/10
|
|
|
|
Post by Shakermaker on Nov 10, 2010 5:43:40 GMT -5
|
|
andytr
Oasis Roadie
Posts: 151
|
Post by andytr on Nov 10, 2010 5:44:33 GMT -5
I'm sorry, but this is the first single & last time I checked a first single is suppose to be one of your 4 best songs on your album. If this is one of the 4 best then BDI is in trouble. What do people this just suppose to wet our appetite? This the first song people will hear by them if they released a mediocre song on purpose then they're idiots. Decent song at best. And its not getting better with each listen. Diappointed by BDI. And I think more people will be too. Especially some people on this forum who are already making excuses or are just in the high of having a new song, or arent willing to say that something that people from Oasis did, wasnt up to par. If this wasnt BDI singing I'd throw it away and most of you would too, if it wasnt Liam or BDI. If this was someone like RADIOHEAD OR Coldplay or something and not BDI, I dont think any of us would give this the time of day. i think this comment just about sums he song up. you would think they would want to release one of their best songs as the first single. if this is a single god knows what the album tracks are gonna be like let alone the fuckin b-sides! i must admit i am very disappointed with it. esp after all the build up and tension waiting for it. to me it sounds like liam doing is best elvis impression! fair enough they have tried something a bit different with the piano and female vocals. but thats not the problem- the problem is the song is poor. the lyrics are crap and repetitive- the baby c'mon over and over at the end is way too much! and the guy who wrote this quote is also spot on in saying if it were any other band we wouldnt give this song the time of day! if it were coldplay ect. we would all be pissing ourselves laughing at it! all the oasis haters will be loving this. i seriously hope the album is way way better than this. i dont mind it being a bit different but it has still gotta be good! i thought bdi were gonna pull out something pretty good to show the world they arent noels puppets but this song doesnt do them any favours disproving that. i can hardly seeing noel quaking in his boots! c'mon bdi prove me wrong pls!!! moan over |
|
|
|
Post by putthisin ® on Nov 10, 2010 5:44:37 GMT -5
After the 2m mark the song goes anywhere.
I think the piano is shocking the listeners more than expected. Maybe if they had it replaced with a guitar riff the perception of the song would be different.
Some good parts, but overall decent at most.
The Meaning of Soul is well better..
And I hope that 22s teaser isn't part of a cover!
|
|
|
|
Post by tomlivesforever on Nov 10, 2010 5:45:04 GMT -5
I didn't, i looked it up discovered you were wrong, which you are. And then pointed this out to you. Its not rocket science mate. Then I suggest you not use an online-dictionary. Okay mediocre and decent have the same meaning, except different connotations. Now stop arguing about something thats completely stupid because your wrong. Ask any English teacher and they'll tell you you're wrong. Or try being an English major. Just got my actual dictionary out, still different. |
|
|
|
Post by danscouse on Nov 10, 2010 5:45:45 GMT -5
Oasis is done and dusted.... The other 3 trying to write oasis songs hasn't worked, this is something totally different.... Dunno who wrote it but songbird aside would easily be that persons best contribution to the oasis cannon. As a taster for the band it's catchy upbeat and fun. Some of you are so misreble who want nothing but supersonic part 2.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mad4it on Nov 10, 2010 5:46:32 GMT -5
This track seems to be getting some heavy bashing. Oh well deal with it..
I personally think its great, wasn't what i expected but still great.
|
|
|
|
Post by spaneli on Nov 10, 2010 5:47:08 GMT -5
Oasis is done and dusted.... The other 3 trying to write oasis songs hasn't worked, this is something totally different.... Dunno who wrote it but songbird aside would easily be that persons best contribution to the oasis cannon. As a taster for the band it's catchy upbeat and fun. Some of you are so misreble who want nothing but supersonic part 2. I havent seen many people calling for that. Just people saying that its not a good song. Its decent at best. |
|
|
|
Post by His Royal Noelness on Nov 10, 2010 5:47:10 GMT -5
If this is an album track imagine how bad the b-sides will be...
|
|
V
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5