|
Post by XTRMNTRSCREAM on Nov 6, 2010 16:26:39 GMT -5
that Fred Perry band is releasing a single on the same day?
|
|
|
Post by spaneli on Nov 6, 2010 16:28:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by XTRMNTRSCREAM on Nov 6, 2010 16:35:44 GMT -5
beady eye can't compete with this.
|
|
|
Post by deasy on Nov 6, 2010 16:37:21 GMT -5
Other releases that week:
Alicia Keys – Wait Til You See My Smile Biffy Clyro - Booooom Blast & Ruin Boys Like Girls - Heart Heart Heartbreak David Guetta feat Rihanna - Who's That Chick Duffy – Well Well Well Freemasons feat Wynter Gordon – Believer Gorillaz feat Daley - Doncamatic (All Played Out) Grinderman - Worm Tamer (12”) I Am Arrows – Hurricane Inna feat Bob Taylor - Deja Vu Jason Derulo - The Sky’s The Limit Josh Groban – Hidden Away Laura Marling – I Speak Because I Can Massive Attack – Atlas Air (EP) Miles Kane – Inhaler (7”) Nervo feat Ollie James – Irresistible Olly Murs - Thinking Of Me The Script – Nothing Selena Gomez & The Scene - A Year Without Rain Shaheen - Last Train Home / Hip Teens (Don't Wear Blue Jeans) Twin Sister - All Around & Away We Go (7”) Wilder – Skyful Of Rainbows (7”) X Factor Finalists – Heroes
Top 5 will be a minor miracle
|
|
|
Post by His Royal Noelness on Nov 6, 2010 16:38:56 GMT -5
will chart outside the top 10
|
|
|
Post by deasy on Nov 6, 2010 16:39:55 GMT -5
will chart outside the top 10 This is the most likely occurrence
|
|
|
Post by spaneli on Nov 6, 2010 16:42:32 GMT -5
will chart outside the top 10 It all depends on something that Oasis was never really good at. PROMOTION But the truth is that if the song is good enough, it will be in the Top 10. Thats will be the real question. Is the song good enough. Because the days of bands announcing singles and getting into the Top 10 automatically are almost gone. Great example Oasis toward the end.
|
|
|
Post by Frank Lee Vulgar on Nov 6, 2010 16:45:01 GMT -5
Damn, that's a lot of well known shit music. It all depends on how many oasis fans got the news that BDI is Oasis minus Noel. Still, No.1 seems impossible, top 5 would be a great success.
|
|
|
Post by The Morning Son on Nov 6, 2010 16:48:09 GMT -5
It should have a good chance purely because the majority of Oasis fans in the UK are gonna purchase it as they will be intrigued. You would like to think anyway, some tough singles there to beat in the modern charts.
Have to admit, I am worried that 22nd November is the rumoured to be the release date and nobody has heard the single yet. Not enough airplay to promote it.
|
|
|
Post by gdforever on Nov 6, 2010 16:55:05 GMT -5
I'd be happy with top 10
|
|
|
Post by deasy on Nov 6, 2010 16:56:36 GMT -5
TSOTL sold 32,119 in its first week (got to #3). That would have only been enough for #11 in last weeks chart. I doubt very much that Beady Eye will open with sales that high either. Maybe even outside top 15?
|
|
|
Post by USOasis86 on Nov 6, 2010 16:59:13 GMT -5
WOW, that is tough, a lot of that shit music (well known mainstream artists), will be bought by brain washed/mindless souls who do not know what real music is.
|
|
|
Post by putthisin ® on Nov 6, 2010 17:00:00 GMT -5
Imagine that the song is an instant classic. Then what?
I doubt it though
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Nov 6, 2010 17:03:16 GMT -5
Who is Fred Perry?
|
|
|
Post by The Morning Son on Nov 6, 2010 17:06:04 GMT -5
The first single should be something pretty good, I mean they've had months and months to be working on it in Beady Eye alone and who knows this song could be years old and should have be re-worked until they get it right.
I'm pretty sure it can sell more than TSOTL because people will be curious, Beady Eye doesnt have a massive name but Liam Gallagher does and he will sell records to Oasis fans and rock fans who wanna see what this band are made of.
I am going to say it will chart in Top 7, other singles will chart Top 20 and album will chart Top 3.
|
|
|
Post by SOULDIGGER on Nov 6, 2010 17:12:30 GMT -5
Beady eye doesn't give two fucks about charts
|
|
|
Post by gdforever on Nov 6, 2010 17:12:33 GMT -5
The first single should be something pretty good, I mean they've had months and months to be working on it in Beady Eye alone and who knows this song could be years old and should have be re-worked until they get it right. I'm pretty sure it can sell more than TSOTL because people will be curious, Beady Eye doesnt have a massive name but Liam Gallagher does and he will sell records to Oasis fans and rock fans who wanna see what this band are made of. I am going to say it will chart in Top 7, other singles will chart Top 20 and album will chart Top 3. Why do people insist on think that: Time spent = quality produced Effort does not equal success...otherwise we would have dozens of legendary albums every year. Most of the other acts have probably also been working on their Christmas singles for months AND the more airheaded of them will have had an army of talented people working on their music for months...BDI only has their band and producer.
|
|
|
Post by spaneli on Nov 6, 2010 17:14:04 GMT -5
^^Good point. Look at Oasis. Perfect example: 3 years of writting for an album and the album is barely above average.
|
|
|
Post by gdforever on Nov 6, 2010 17:14:19 GMT -5
Beady eye doesn't give two fucks about charts But it is a common and easy to understand meter of success. More albums = more people who like your music. And Liam does want to make music people like.
|
|
|
Post by spaneli on Nov 6, 2010 17:17:17 GMT -5
^^Again I agree. ahahaha this is the agreeing day. Anyways, I dont care how much an artist says that he doesnt care about album sales, or what the fans think, they're lying. There is a bit in all of us that wants our hard work to turn into success.
|
|
|
Post by The Morning Son on Nov 6, 2010 17:31:14 GMT -5
The first single should be something pretty good, I mean they've had months and months to be working on it in Beady Eye alone and who knows this song could be years old and should have be re-worked until they get it right. I'm pretty sure it can sell more than TSOTL because people will be curious, Beady Eye doesnt have a massive name but Liam Gallagher does and he will sell records to Oasis fans and rock fans who wanna see what this band are made of. I am going to say it will chart in Top 7, other singles will chart Top 20 and album will chart Top 3. Why do people insist on think that: Time spent = quality produced I beg to differ in certain respects, I admit genius will come instantly and if it isn't there then it cant be created but if this single 'Bring The Light' was written in 2007, then surely the melody or bassline could have been improved since then several times. Also you would like to think that they have improved over the years as songwriters and musicians and as I believe a lot of the material they will be working on will be from 2006 onwards then they should have been able to improve on it several times. Different opinions though I guess.
|
|
|
Post by gdforever on Nov 6, 2010 17:40:10 GMT -5
Why do people insist on think that: Time spent = quality produced I beg to differ in certain respects, I admit genius will come instantly and if it isn't there then it cant be created but if this single 'Bring The Light' was written in 2007, then surely the melody or bassline could have been improved since then several times. Also you would like to think that they have improved over the years as songwriters and musicians and as I believe a lot of the material they will be working on will be from 2006 onwards then they should have been able to improve on it several times. Different opinions though I guess. I don't think you create brilliance through hard work. If you can turn a good song into a brilliant song...it's usually because you had a brilliant idea for a bassline, drumming pattern, etc. The brilliance doesn't have to be there at the moment of inception...but it has to come in a revelationary moment @ some point. And even if you wait 10 years...it won't necessarily come. In my mind you can make an average song good through hard work. But you can't make a average song brilliant simply by working a little longer. Either you have the base materials or you don't.
|
|
|
Post by spaneli on Nov 6, 2010 17:41:27 GMT -5
^^It depends on your approach. There's no right length of time for anything. There have been just as bad albums that took 5 years to make as there are that took 2 weeks to make, and vise versa. Time does not make greatness, nor does brevity. If something is great its great no matter how much time is spent on it, same goes if something is bad.
You can have all the great base lines in the world, and all the riff, and a full orchestra and choir, but if the song doesnt sound good on a acoustic when you're playing it to yourself, then chances are it will never sound good. No matter how much time you spend on it. I mean sure you can edit and stuff, but as GDForver said the basic idea has to be great and it all starts on that acoustic.
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Nov 6, 2010 17:43:57 GMT -5
I'm seriously not joking. Who is Fred Perry?
|
|
|
Post by XTRMNTRSCREAM on Nov 6, 2010 17:44:54 GMT -5
|
|