|
|
Post by safajy on Apr 11, 2009 5:26:59 GMT -5
Im fed up of all the oasis die hards wearing tinted glasses (oasis my fav band ) the gospel truth in the cold light of day is this,they try to use the beatles to influence them ,liam will never b lennon , im outta time will never b up there with (imagine) and did they ever bloody stop to think the beatles released an album once somtimes two every year ....NOT EVERY 3-4YRS!!!!! AND TO ALL THOSE WHO THINK DIG OUT YOUR SOUL MERITS 3 YRS WORK !!! UTTER RUBBISH ..it wouldnt even have made a b-side in the b here now era , THE STONE ROSES ALBUM IS 20 YEARS OLD ..and i think its BETTER !! than dig out your soul my point is people still listen to the roses album I Wanna Be Adored 2. Waterfall 3. She Bangs The Drums 4. Don't Stop 5. Bye Bye Badman 6. Elizabeth My Dear 7. Song For My Sugar Spun Sister 8. Made Of Stone 9. Shoot You Down 10. This Is The One 11. I Am The Resurrection NOW DOES ANYONE THINK THEY SHALL STILL B LISTENING TO DIG OUT YOUR SOUL IN 20 YRS TIME!!!  |
|
|
|
Post by LlAM on Apr 11, 2009 6:09:07 GMT -5
I agree totally. Dig Out Your Soul doesn't merit 3 years work.
The problem being the bands choice of direction I reckon, cos I hope for the love of God they have enough songs between them to not even bring songs like Aint Got Muffin, Soldier On and TNOR into the equasion.
It sometimes bothers me that they don't just put their 12 best tracks onto one album, but as mentioned it was a deliberate choice to go down the groovy path.
Noel said in a recent interview, that the band have reached their goal- their work since SOTSOG has lead up to this moment so maybe we'll see a different approach to things next time round.
This could turn into a motherfucking long post ala NL4E cos we could spend all night discussing wether or not the band should take a more commercial approach to their next record or if they should (like they did with DBTT and DOYS) release an album of stuff they enjoy doing.
Anyhow, I'm looking forward to a Noel solo album more than the next Oasis album.
|
|
|
|
Post by safajy on Apr 11, 2009 6:27:48 GMT -5
yeah a noel solo album would b intresting whilst on that subject theres an oasis song called solve my mystery dont think its ever been released perhaps he's keeping it for himself lol p.s better than high horse lady !!
|
|
|
|
Post by bankrobber on Apr 11, 2009 8:12:55 GMT -5
i take it your more of a Roses fan than Oasis
some good points especially regarding how long it takes for an album
but then it would be interesting to look at HOW LONG & WHERE both Oasis and The Beatles tour, whether Oasis tour for longer etc
but then OASIS have far outlasted The Beatles, The Beatles wouldnt have worked in the 80's for example
|
|
|
|
Post by cheerfuljamie on Apr 11, 2009 8:26:27 GMT -5
Can You list the songs from DM and then tell me how good The Stone Roses 7th Album was?
|
|
|
|
Post by safajy on Apr 11, 2009 9:23:23 GMT -5
no need for sarcasism m8 ,besides as for definetely maybe? ..i prefer wtsmg + be here now apart from rock n roll star live forever and slide away i dnt listen to much of the first album .
|
|
|
|
Post by lampard on Apr 11, 2009 10:24:59 GMT -5
you lot are a bunch of whingers.
|
|
|
|
Post by LlAM on Apr 11, 2009 10:32:30 GMT -5
you lot are a bunch of whingers. That sounds like whinging if I've ever heard it |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2009 12:15:13 GMT -5
its a mostly brilliant album its just got two or three filler tracks on it ill definitely still be listening to it 20 years down the line and when IWLIADIMRM/CO(IA) get released just swap them for the tracks you dont like in your WMP playlist, but id have to agree that the stone roses is a better album
|
|
msa13
Oasis Roadie
Posts: 141
|
Post by msa13 on Apr 11, 2009 12:35:44 GMT -5
Why are you comparing Dig Out Your Soul to The Stone Roses album? You might as well just pull any classic album out of your ass and say DOYS isn't as good. DOYS is still a great album even if it isn't as good as Abbey Road, Live at Leeds or In the Court of the Crimson King.
|
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Apr 11, 2009 13:13:06 GMT -5
WTF
You're comparing two different things. The Stone Roses (album) is more comparable to WTSMG - they're both melodic. While DOYS is similar to The Second Coming - more rocking and groove based.
As gor your other claim? I'm not having that, either. The Turning would have made it on BHN, TSOTL could have made it on either DM, WTSMG, or BHN, SO could have fitted at the end of SOTSOG (although I do personally like RIO a lot more), then there's WFTR which is just ace.....
Sorry, I don't agree at all with your mind numbing criticism of the album. Fuck off to a Coldplay forum, please.
|
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Apr 11, 2009 13:40:29 GMT -5
Anyhow, I'm looking forward to a Noel solo album more than the next Oasis album.  x infinity |
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Apr 11, 2009 13:41:46 GMT -5
Can You list the songs from DM and then tell me how good The Stone Roses 7th Album was?  x infinity |
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Apr 11, 2009 13:44:26 GMT -5
no need for sarcasism m8 ,besides as for definetely maybe? ..i prefer wtsmg + be here now apart from rock n roll star live forever and slide away i dnt listen to much of the first album .  infinity Supersonic? Columbia? Married With Children? Cigs and Alc? Bring It On Down?....Slide Away and Live Forever as you mentioned....it's as close to a perfect record as one can possibly get! |
|
|
|
Post by LlAM on Apr 11, 2009 14:50:18 GMT -5
Anyhow, I'm looking forward to a Noel solo album more than the next Oasis album. x infinity 2010 according to credible sources |
|
|
|
Post by Elias on Apr 11, 2009 15:07:19 GMT -5
THE STONE ROSES ALBUM IS 20 YEARS OLD ..and i think its BETTER !! than dig out your soul What a massive, epoch making revelation. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 11, 2009 16:10:10 GMT -5
Err, what?
|
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Apr 11, 2009 16:32:40 GMT -5
And a steak is better than an apple.
What a stupid comparison.
|
|
|
|
Post by caimanque on Apr 11, 2009 16:33:51 GMT -5
Coldgay thread
|
|
|
|
Post by lionsden® on Apr 11, 2009 21:09:24 GMT -5
And a steak is better than an apple. What a stupid comparison. How would you know what a steak tastes like? |
|
|
|
Post by safajy on Apr 12, 2009 3:34:17 GMT -5
m8 i hate coldplay and the fact that 217 ppl so far have read this most of them must agree with me cos if the didnt theyd all b clambering on here to slate me ,while am here to the guy that says DOYS is similar to The Second Coming - more rocking and groove based. FUCK OFF!!! dont talk shite ,what exactly is rocking on dig out your soul? Breaking into heaven,Tears ,Ten storey love song ,how do you sleep ,driving south now THATS WHAT YOU CALL ROCKING AND THATS WHAT YOU CALL GUITAR SOLOS!!!!! I listen to oasis more there my fav band,but the roses a close second ,I FUCKING HATE COLDPLAY!!! .All i ask is for people to stop kidding themselves, if DIG OUT YOUR SOUL was released by an unknown band ,they (PUBLIC)would overlook ,the shock of the lightning as an oasis rip off and say falling down was ok but the rest was shite . |
|
|
|
Post by tomlivesforever on Apr 12, 2009 3:54:59 GMT -5
Wtf is this thread. The stone roses album is one of the finest of the last 30 years. Doys in just decent.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 12, 2009 14:16:42 GMT -5
Second Coming is shit.
Obligatory whenever mentioned.
|
|
fastfuse
Oasis Roadie
Today Class We Shall Learn Rock N' Roll History
Posts: 264
|
Post by fastfuse on Apr 12, 2009 14:37:34 GMT -5
Second Coming isn't shit, its just not what most Roses fans wanted...Theres some good songs on it.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 12, 2009 15:17:03 GMT -5
Second Coming isn't shit, its just not what most Roses fans wanted...Theres some good songs on it. Well, there's Breaking Into Heaven, Love Spreads, and Ten Storey Love Songs. I can't stomach the rest, if I wanted Led Zeppelin I'd listen to Led Zeppelin. |
|
x infinity 
infinity
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5