|
Post by music89 on Feb 5, 2009 14:02:18 GMT -5
"By the way, there's gonna be a very special release coming your way soon. Remember that "Amorphous Androgynous" lot I was telling you about? Well, they've done a "Monstrous Psychedelic Bubble" mix of "Falling Down". It's 22 mins long. I'll repeat that, TWENTY-TWO MINUTES LONG!! I fully expect 50% of you not to have the attention span to deal with something like that but the rest of you, I hope, will be blown away. It's a staggering piece of music. Monumental even. All superlatives will apply."
Anyway, enough. Time off has just begun.
holy crap, that could either be fuckin awesome, or disastrous. Probably is the B-side to the Falling Down Single
|
|
|
Post by sloasis on Feb 5, 2009 14:22:14 GMT -5
I hope for an epic psychadelic music experience
|
|
|
Post by noelhimself on Feb 5, 2009 15:52:47 GMT -5
You know what Noel's like tho, he said record machine was 9 minutes long, so itll prob end up just a 3 minute b-side, hope not tho! I've heard the psych bubble album that noel kept goin on about and AA have done some good remixes!
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Feb 5, 2009 17:00:04 GMT -5
You know what Noel's like tho, he said record machine was 9 minutes long, so itll prob end up just a 3 minute b-side, hope not tho! I've heard the psych bubble album that noel kept goin on about and AA have done some good remixes! ? I'm sure the finished version of RM will be 9mins! I dont see how they're gonna stretch a 4min song into 22mins, but we shall see, should be interesting anyhow
|
|
|
Post by The Boy Without the Blues on Feb 5, 2009 17:03:03 GMT -5
I honestly don't have a clue what to expect... I personaly find the Chemical Bros. remix to be quite awesome, i don't know why making another mix of the same song....
|
|
|
Post by akara on Feb 5, 2009 17:19:41 GMT -5
I _REALLY_ look forward to hear this remix! It's worth buying the single, just to hear the remix (which will be amazing)!!
|
|
|
Post by Way Cool Jr. on Feb 5, 2009 17:57:37 GMT -5
there's no way 22 min of a 4 min song is going to be any good
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Feb 5, 2009 17:58:36 GMT -5
there's no way 22 min of a 4 min song is going to be any good Spot on.
|
|
|
Post by putthisin ® on Feb 5, 2009 18:22:53 GMT -5
it could be 2 hours of remix. it will suck anyway
|
|
|
Post by eva on Feb 5, 2009 19:42:27 GMT -5
a 22 min. long remix. yay
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Feb 5, 2009 20:16:10 GMT -5
One has to wonder who's fucking idea this was and how they could possibly believe that anyone would spend their spare time listening to a 22min song once, let alone repeat it for years to come.
I can you right now none of you, nor myself, will listen to the entire 22mins. We'll make up our mind within the first 2mins - if we don't like, we'll stop listening.....if we like it, we'll skip parts.
Another epic fail from the Oasis camp because they don't understand what the fans really want. Chalk this up with the failure of the FD video. Of course we have to listen to it first, but all I'm saying is that the general idea of it is very stupid.
|
|
|
Post by ToneBender on Feb 5, 2009 20:50:15 GMT -5
One has to wonder who's fucking idea this was and how they could possibly believe that anyone would spend their spare time listening to a 22min song once, let alone repeat it for years to come. I can you right now none of you, nor myself, will listen to the entire 22mins. We'll make up our mind within the first 2mins - if we don't like, we'll stop listening.....if we like it, we'll skip parts. Another epic fail from the Oasis camp because they don't understand what the fans really want. Chalk this up with the failure of the FD video. Of course we have to listen to it first, but all I'm saying is that the general idea of it is very stupid. First you claim that no one is as smart as you and then you decide that no one has the attention span for a 22 minute mix? Wow.
|
|
|
Post by spaneli on Feb 5, 2009 21:14:25 GMT -5
No one can listen to an entire mix. I have a question. Have you ever listened to all of In a Gadda Da Vida. If you can't listen to that then you can't listen to a 22 min. song.
|
|
|
Post by ToneBender on Feb 5, 2009 21:37:33 GMT -5
I'm fairly certain that after 4 years of undergrad study in audio technology and my current line of work I can sit for 22 minutes through one "song".
|
|
|
Post by AKA_TheBrokenArrow on Feb 5, 2009 21:48:38 GMT -5
No one can listen to an entire mix. I have a question. Have you ever listened to all of In a Gadda Da Vida. If you can't listen to that then you can't listen to a 22 min. song. I've heard all 17 mins of In a Gadda Da Vida. It's a good tune.
|
|
|
Post by ToneBender on Feb 5, 2009 21:52:24 GMT -5
I guess Noel's "I bet half of you don't have the attention span" comment was spot on...!
|
|
|
Post by spaneli on Feb 5, 2009 22:01:42 GMT -5
I wasn't referring to you, but NL4E. Another thing i've listened to In a Gadda Da Vda. Another thing there is no amount of training that will get you through a 22 min. song. Being made to listen one and wanting and being able to do it with comprehending are two different things. Just because Noel says a comment like that don't agree just to make yourself sound smarter.
|
|
|
Post by ToneBender on Feb 5, 2009 22:13:03 GMT -5
I agreed because the majority of the people on here said it was too long, thus far giving credence to Noel's statement. And there's no amount of training that can get someone through a 22 minute song? Really? Do you listen to classical music at all? Any Pink Floyd?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2009 22:23:44 GMT -5
Lucky none of you were around to see Zeppelin live. Would ya throw peanuts at 'em 10 minutes into Dazed and Confused?
|
|
|
Post by Cast on Feb 5, 2009 22:30:38 GMT -5
wtf guys i'm not saying its gonna be amazing but 10 plus stuff is just epic. imagine that shit stoned would be sick usually long songs are cos its like a journey.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Feb 5, 2009 22:53:54 GMT -5
One has to wonder who's fucking idea this was and how they could possibly believe that anyone would spend their spare time listening to a 22min song once, let alone repeat it for years to come. I can you right now none of you, nor myself, will listen to the entire 22mins. We'll make up our mind within the first 2mins - if we don't like, we'll stop listening.....if we like it, we'll skip parts. Another epic fail from the Oasis camp because they don't understand what the fans really want. Chalk this up with the failure of the FD video. Of course we have to listen to it first, but all I'm saying is that the general idea of it is very stupid. Really, you probably spend more time on your threads here. You shouldn't really be talking about how valuable time is when you waste most of your free time here.
|
|
|
Post by ToneBender on Feb 5, 2009 23:01:26 GMT -5
I'm still at a loss as to how this is a failure from the Oasis camp...It sounds like Noel liked what he heard in the box sets he got of these guys, decided it would be cool to have them remix one of his tracks and decided that he'd like to release it having been pleased with the results. The nerve!
All that being said, I'd imagine it's going to be a "song" loosely based around the framework of "Falling Down" with parts of it interspersed throughout. In other words, make up your mind when you hear it.
|
|
|
Post by Jessica on Feb 6, 2009 0:29:00 GMT -5
Pfft. I'll listen to the full thing. I spend 5 hours working in ProTools for ONE SONG.
|
|
|
Post by bathqueen on Feb 6, 2009 4:42:30 GMT -5
F**king hell, bad news. They'll probably slice it in two so we'll get two bsides.
Anyway, awful idea. no way you wont be bored after 10 minutes. Well at least not if your high.....
|
|
|
Post by themanwithnoname on Feb 6, 2009 5:32:18 GMT -5
I'm afraid this reeks of self-indulgence.
Noel should realise fans want new songs rather than 22-minute remixes that sound 'colossal' to him but crap to everyone else.
Of course, it could be brilliant. But somehow I doubt it.
The DOYS era is fact becoming the least satisfying in Oasis's career for this particular fan.
|
|