|
Post by webm@ster on Oct 3, 2008 16:38:25 GMT -5
After Rolling Stone got a deserved ass kicking in my comments section in the newsroom regarding their 2 and 1/2 half star rating of the album I was wondering why nobody seemed too upset about the SUN only giving it 3 stars? Ok , it's a tabloid but it seems like they under scored the Album compared to the rest of the English Press ??
|
|
harry
Oasis Roadie
*****
Posts: 279
|
Post by harry on Oct 3, 2008 16:45:07 GMT -5
The S*n is a horrible rag and I pay no attention to anything they say so couldnt really give a feck what they rate DOYS to be honest.
The Mirror gave it 4/5 today by the way. Wouldnt bother posting the write-up they gave though cos it was a load of rubbish.
|
|
|
Post by halftheworldaway06 on Oct 3, 2008 16:54:41 GMT -5
rolling stone is bullshit, I searched for oasis under the O's and their not even listed and the header is this "Listed below are the most influential Rolling Stone artists. If the artist you want is not listed, search for them by name." and thats just the O's so apparently to Rolling Stone Oasis are not even one of the most influential artists that names start with O
|
|
|
Post by halftheworldaway06 on Oct 3, 2008 16:56:16 GMT -5
also any time I try and search for oasis on Rolling Stone nothing comes up but when I put another artist in it comes up right away, I wonder if they shut down the oasis page cause everyone was critizing their review
|
|
gem909
Oasis Roadie
Posts: 101
|
Post by gem909 on Oct 3, 2008 16:59:46 GMT -5
i took a big fat shit last night after many drinks and wiped my ass with the rolling stone with chris martin on the cover
|
|
|
Post by matt on Oct 4, 2008 9:33:58 GMT -5
i took a big fat shit last night after many drinks and wiped my ass with the rolling stone with chris martin on the cover The Rolling Stone isn't suitable to be wiping your ass with.
|
|
|
Post by soldieroff on Oct 5, 2008 7:30:28 GMT -5
bit too shiny innit - could cause some serious accident
|
|