|
|
Post by 1manband on Jul 28, 2008 11:07:16 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by lorddontnoelmenow on Jul 28, 2008 11:08:52 GMT -5
Nothing really new but i can confirm that Anit got nothing is the same song/length as the leak. it just has a more distinct guitar solo.
|
|
|
|
Post by lorddontnoelmenow on Jul 28, 2008 11:12:07 GMT -5
the turning is sung by noel
|
|
|
|
Post by curlies on Jul 28, 2008 11:15:57 GMT -5
We are going to know a little more probably :  "Oasis, the inside story of their road to glory" |
|
|
|
Post by Cast on Jul 28, 2008 11:19:18 GMT -5
I'm not defending anyone. but this lack of info could be the calm before the storm.
|
|
dc
Madferrit Fan
Posts: 74
|
Post by dc on Jul 28, 2008 11:20:51 GMT -5
We are going to know a little more probably : "Oasis, the inside story of their road to glory" No new news in there...its about the road to glory years 93-97. |
|
|
|
Post by The Boy Without the Blues on Jul 28, 2008 11:22:19 GMT -5
Unfortunately for the riddler, he is now not the only person who has heard the album. but riddler, thank you for the information you have given us so far! what can you tell us about this two acoustic songs? With all due respect mate, shut the fuck up. Seriously. No one in their right mind would believe you. You've given us nothing but a regurgitated form of information we already knew, but added the "2 acoustic songs" tid bit to sound credible, while in actuality the band has come out as said there's no acoustics on it. If you're gonna make up information and pass it off as the truth, at least dont make up things that are confirmed not to be true. Take your "information" and shove it up your ass, I'm sure it has more use up there. Thank you. Dude you're such an arrogant ass. Lorddontnoelmenow is not any batman villain, a tennis player or a sucker with two posts. If the guy is saying that is because so he heard it... and if it's true of course it will sound just like everything we heard so far, cos' it's true. And sometimes looks like you don't know this band at all. Once Liam said that there would be no acoustic. They also said HC and DBTT would be as good as DM. They also said about a song called 'Let It Come Down Over Me' being in the album. They mentioned all songs being fresh and new, and there is Ain't Got Nothing right back from the HC era. Once it was told STC was Noel's best song and still haven't shown up in three album's. You see that i could go on forever right?? Bottom of line, don't trust everything the lads have to say. Of course there will be acoustic songs in the album, maybe not like LTBL, but like LLAB and SMC (with acoustic guitars and electric guitars during chorus and solo), which may sound acoustic for some people, regardless the presence of an electric guitar as well. I'm pretty sure I'm Outta Time will be an acoustic ballad, and perhaps Gem's song which is supposed to be like 'A hard Day's Night' might be acoustic too, or maybe the original version of Falling Down. Anyway, I have no reason not to believe in Lorddontnoelmenow, and if you do just stay out of the thread it's really annoying to see the way you disrespect other members in this forum. |
|
|
|
Post by mrmonkey on Jul 28, 2008 11:22:24 GMT -5
yep nothing in there thats new
some nice pics though
|
|
|
|
Post by lorddontnoelmenow on Jul 28, 2008 11:26:28 GMT -5
With all due respect mate, shut the fuck up. Seriously. No one in their right mind would believe you. You've given us nothing but a regurgitated form of information we already knew, but added the "2 acoustic songs" tid bit to sound credible, while in actuality the band has come out as said there's no acoustics on it. If you're gonna make up information and pass it off as the truth, at least dont make up things that are confirmed not to be true. Take your "information" and shove it up your ass, I'm sure it has more use up there. Thank you. Dude you're such an arrogant ass. Lorddontnoelmenow is not any batman villain, a tennis player or a sucker with two posts. If the guy is saying that is because so he heard it... and if it's true of course it will sound just like everything we heard so far, cos' it's true. And sometimes looks like you don't know this band at all. Once Liam said that there would be no acoustic. They also said HC and DBTT would be as good as DM. They also said about a song called 'Let It Come Down Over Me' being in the album. They mentioned all songs being fresh and new, and there is Ain't Got Nothing right back from the HC era. Once it was told STC was Noel's best song and still haven't shown up in three album's. You see that i could go on forever right?? Bottom of line, don't trust everything the lads have to say. Of course there will be acoustic songs in the album, maybe not like LTBL, but like LLAB and SMC (with acoustic guitars and electric guitars during chorus and solo), which may sound acoustic for some people, regardless the presence of an electric guitar as well. I'm pretty sure I'm Outta Time will be an acoustic ballad, and perhaps Gem's song which is supposed to be like 'A hard Day's Night' might be acoustic too, or maybe the original version of Falling Down. Anyway, I have no reason not to believe in Lorddontnoelmenow, and if you do just stay out of the thread it's really annoying to see the way you disrespect other members in this forum. muinto obrigado |
|
|
|
Post by AbbeyR0ad on Jul 28, 2008 11:29:09 GMT -5
Nothing really new but i can confirm that Anit got nothing is the same song/length as the leak. it just has a more distinct guitar solo. I thought we had the length for that song already and it was a minute or so longer than the demo  |
|
|
|
Post by lorddontnoelmenow on Jul 28, 2008 11:31:03 GMT -5
Nothing really new but i can confirm that Anit got nothing is the same song/length as the leak. it just has a more distinct guitar solo. I thought we had the length for that song already and it was a minute or so longer than the demo i thought so too but the lenth is the same. why does liam write so many songs that are around that 2 min marker? |
|
|
|
Post by Rock N' Roll Dad on Jul 28, 2008 11:34:31 GMT -5
Fair play lads - take the info or leave it. No need for name calling...
|
|
|
|
Post by njoasisnyc on Jul 28, 2008 11:37:14 GMT -5
this guy is the new riddler.. the riddler is getting owned by this guy big time. he just spit out more info in 20 mins then this whole month of terroizing by theriddler and in english.
|
|
|
|
Post by lorddontnoelmenow on Jul 28, 2008 11:39:17 GMT -5
this guy is the new riddler.. the riddler is getting owned by this guy big time. he just spit out more info in 20 mins then this whole month of terroizing by theriddler and in english. In no way am I trying to compete with the riddler, she has shared good info with us. Ill keep passing on what I hear from here. |
|
|
|
Post by njoasisnyc on Jul 28, 2008 11:41:33 GMT -5
don't hold back.. you are OWNING theriddler
|
|
|
|
Post by shoofee on Jul 28, 2008 11:43:30 GMT -5
I'm not sure if I believe this - Not too long ago, Liam said "the tunes are all rocking, there's no acoustics on it" Of course this may have changed, but I have my doubts. Now, the songs in question may be "softer" and/or more anthem-like. But acoustic? Surely not? They said "no acoustics" back in January 2007. This is the same interview where Record Machine was mentioned being ten minutes long, and Noel wanting to have orchestras and all that baloney were first mentioned. The Q "preview" earlier this year, along with the Daily Star story, were rehashes of the NME thing from January 2007. More than a year before they finished this record. Its almost an impossibility to think that Oasis would record an album without an acoustic guitar. They've not done it yet. Even if just an accompaniment track, there was bound to be acoustics on it. You cannot believe everything that is said by any member of this band about an album until just before release. They havent really said much of anything at all. Besides, the "no acoustics" bullshit was over the moment a picture of Noel in the studio PLAYING AN ACOUSTIC was posted on Inet back a few months ago when they were posting those pics.  |
|
|
|
Post by mercury3164 on Jul 28, 2008 11:45:54 GMT -5
why are you all believing this guy lorddon'tnoelmenow??? How is he different from any of the other bullshitters saying "I work at blank" or "I know someone at blank who has heard the record and says blank" You are all just being duped again. After all this is the same tool who said he had a special sound check version of SIOL and right when he's suppose to share it he says his hard drive just crashed conveniently at the same time he was suppose to share it.
He has given absolutely no proof that he works for Rolling Stone, you are just all buying into it. He has given no proof that RS guys always get to hear albums more than a month early... I have never heard of that ever happening is too soon. The riddler has WAY more credit than this guy, because the riddler actually proved that he knew something (with the track title). This guy is just all speculation just like all of the others. Until he proves something he is just another loser... if he does prove what he is saying somehow, then I will retract my statements, but I doubt that will happen.
|
|
|
|
Post by shoofee on Jul 28, 2008 11:46:28 GMT -5
Unfortunately for the riddler, he is now not the only person who has heard the album. but riddler, thank you for the information you have given us so far! what can you tell us about this two acoustic songs? With all due respect mate, shut the fuck up. Seriously. No one in their right mind would believe you. You've given us nothing but a regurgitated form of information we already knew, but added the "2 acoustic songs" tid bit to sound credible, while in actuality the band has come out as said there's no acoustics on it. If you're gonna make up information and pass it off as the truth, at least dont make up things that are confirmed not to be true. Take your "information" and shove it up your ass, I'm sure it has more use up there. Thank you. You are the most ignorant fuck on this board, not to mention the stupidest. |
|
|
|
Post by shoofee on Jul 28, 2008 11:47:06 GMT -5
why are you all believing this guy lorddon'tnoelmenow??? How is he different from any of the other bullshitters saying "I work at blank" or "I know someone at blank who has heard the record and says blank" You are all just being duped again. After all this is the same tool who said he had a special sound check version of SIOL and right when he's suppose to share it he says his hard drive just crashed conveniently at the same time he was suppose to share it. He has given absolutely no proof that he works for Rolling Stone, you are just all buying into it. He has given no proof that RS guys always get to hear albums more than a month early... I have never heard of that ever happening is too soon. The riddler has WAY more credit than this guy, because the riddler actually proved that he knew something (with the track title). This guy is just all speculation just like all of the others. Until he proves something he is just another loser... if he does prove what he is saying somehow, then I will retract my statements, but I doubt that will happen. Im not saying I believe him at all, but "Notorious L.4.E" is a total fucking idiot no doubt. |
|
dc
Madferrit Fan
Posts: 74
|
Post by dc on Jul 28, 2008 11:48:47 GMT -5
why are you all believing this guy lorddon'tnoelmenow??? How is he different from any of the other bullshitters saying "I work at blank" or "I know someone at blank who has heard the record and says blank" You are all just being duped again. After all this is the same tool who said he had a special sound check version of SIOL and right when he's suppose to share it he says his hard drive just crashed conveniently at the same time he was suppose to share it. He has given absolutely no proof that he works for Rolling Stone, you are just all buying into it. He has given no proof that RS guys always get to hear albums more than a month early... I have never heard of that ever happening is too soon. The riddler has WAY more credit than this guy, because the riddler actually proved that he knew something (with the track title). This guy is just all speculation just like all of the others. Until he proves something he is just another loser... if he does prove what he is saying somehow, then I will retract my statements, but I doubt that will happen. Im not saying I believe him at all, but "Notorious L.4.E" is a total fucking idiot no doubt. Aye +1 |
|
|
|
Post by mercury3164 on Jul 28, 2008 11:49:01 GMT -5
why are you all believing this guy lorddon'tnoelmenow??? How is he different from any of the other bullshitters saying "I work at blank" or "I know someone at blank who has heard the record and says blank" You are all just being duped again. After all this is the same tool who said he had a special sound check version of SIOL and right when he's suppose to share it he says his hard drive just crashed conveniently at the same time he was suppose to share it. He has given absolutely no proof that he works for Rolling Stone, you are just all buying into it. He has given no proof that RS guys always get to hear albums more than a month early... I have never heard of that ever happening is too soon. The riddler has WAY more credit than this guy, because the riddler actually proved that he knew something (with the track title). This guy is just all speculation just like all of the others. Until he proves something he is just another loser... if he does prove what he is saying somehow, then I will retract my statements, but I doubt that will happen. Im not saying I believe him at all, but "Notorious L.4.E" is a total fucking idiot no doubt. yes i know this is true also... |
|
|
|
Post by start at the end on Jul 28, 2008 11:56:57 GMT -5
With all due respect mate, shut the fuck up. Seriously. No one in their right mind would believe you. You've given us nothing but a regurgitated form of information we already knew, but added the "2 acoustic songs" tid bit to sound credible, while in actuality the band has come out as said there's no acoustics on it. If you're gonna make up information and pass it off as the truth, at least dont make up things that are confirmed not to be true. Take your "information" and shove it up your ass, I'm sure it has more use up there. Thank you. You are the most ignorant fuck on this board, not to mention the stupidest. I feel bad for laughing at this as hard as I did. |
|
|
|
Post by njoasisnyc on Jul 28, 2008 11:59:53 GMT -5
l.4.e is pretty ignorant.
|
|
|
|
Post by start at the end on Jul 28, 2008 12:05:41 GMT -5
I have to admit that it kinda scares me if nothing on me makes it on there as we know it. The idea that they didnt have another tune to bend it off or at least the sense to seriously re-work it is troubling.
Awful song that one is.
|
|
|
|
Post by lorddontnoelmenow on Jul 28, 2008 12:07:36 GMT -5
So this is the info ive gottin today:
liam sings these songs:
Bag It Up
Waiting for the Rapture
The Shock of the Lightning
I'm Outta Time
(Get Off Your) High Horse Lady
To Be Where There's Life
Ain't Got Nothin
Soldier On
Noel Sings These Songs:
The Turning
Falling Down
The Nature of Reality
2 acoustic songs on the album
aint got nothing is the same as the demo
album is heavy. killer drumming and good guitar solos
their least "beatle like" album they've made
|
|
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5