|
Post by brumoscardo on May 19, 2008 17:06:28 GMT -5
where did you grab this info?...is it creditable? No, he's just mentally ill. BTW 3,5 years are too fucking long to release a record. and they got it ready by the end of january. why to release it 6 months after?
|
|
|
Post by Jonny on May 20, 2008 15:11:45 GMT -5
To be fair, you can't just knock out an album just because the songs are recorded. You have to mix it, edit it and produce it properly. Then there's artwork, then develop a marketing campaign, plan the singles... I personally think that September's date is just a front to be honest. Clever marketing. Like the way the management "leaked" these tracks My theory anyway.
|
|
|
Post by TheEXPERIENCE on May 20, 2008 15:33:30 GMT -5
To be fair, you can't just knock out an album just because the songs are recorded. You have to mix it, edit it and produce it properly. Then there's artwork, then develop a marketing campaign, plan the singles... I personally think that September's date is just a front to be honest. Clever marketing. Like the way the management "leaked" these tracks
My theory anyway. i thought about that too...it certainly makes alot of sense. they had a song in STC that was going to disappoint no matter what, only because it's basically been made out to be the next "A Day in the Life". So what did they do? Put out a demo of the song so now no matter what you hear, it's going to sound better. Brilliant.
|
|