|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Apr 30, 2008 10:54:57 GMT -5
What do you reckon?
I --> 1994 to 1999: Glory days, biggest band in the world
II--> 2000 to 2004: Uninspired, "has-beens" (music critics)
III-->2005 to ?? : Return to form, focused, mature....
I guess this new album will confirm if Oasis are continuing in the right directionn after DBTT or not
|
|
|
|
Post by novascotialad on Apr 30, 2008 11:38:36 GMT -5
omf... how many shit threads is one member allowed before they are shown the door?
|
|
|
|
Post by castlecraver on Apr 30, 2008 12:24:17 GMT -5
How I see it...
I --> 1995 to present: My favorite band.
Fuck the analysis. I couldn't care less what other people think, or what "right direction" even means.
|
|
|
|
Post by mercury3164 on Apr 30, 2008 12:37:20 GMT -5
don't give a shit as long as they continue releasing good tunes
|
|
|
|
Post by oasis6 on Apr 30, 2008 12:42:33 GMT -5
Give Headshrinker a break, there is nothing wrong with this thread. As for his analysis, I think it fits.
|
|
|
|
Post by Marcos on Apr 30, 2008 12:47:24 GMT -5
i guess the glory days were from '94 till '97 (or maybe '98).. not '99
|
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Apr 30, 2008 13:04:45 GMT -5
omf... how many shit threads is one member allowed before they are shown the door? you're the fool a few months ago saying since the members have children and a family now they wont be making albums or touring. so much for that. at least my analysis is thought provoking, yours is just pure bullshit. |
|
|
|
Post by novascotialad on Apr 30, 2008 14:18:32 GMT -5
omf... how many shit threads is one member allowed before they are shown the door? you're the fool a few months ago saying since the members have children and a family now they wont be making albums or touring. so much for that. at least my analysis is thought provoking, yours is just pure bullshit. Haahhahahaha,,, holy fuck... you're still on that? get over it.... sorry for dissin your thread... i take it back.... it's the greatest thread in the history of threads.... i look forward to reading your next thought provoking entry. lol. |
|
|
|
Post by Frodis on Apr 30, 2008 15:11:16 GMT -5
How I see it... I --> 1995 to present: My favorite band. Fuck the analysis. I couldn't care less what other people think, or what "right direction" even means. agreed. |
|
|
|
Post by headcase on Apr 30, 2008 19:12:49 GMT -5
It really bothers me when people say "oasis are"
That's grammatically incorrect.
|
|
|
|
Post by Beady’s Here Now on Apr 30, 2008 19:19:30 GMT -5
It really bothers me when people say "oasis are" That's grammatically incorrect. No it's not. In England it's "Oasis are", "Arsenal are" etc in the US it's "Oasis is", "Arsenal is" etc The UK version is smarter....a group consists of many people, thus it should count as plural.... Even though I know the above, and even though i'm in the US, I still use the UK format most of the time just by habit from being raised in the UK....Never been marked off for it, I guess as long as you're consistent, it hardly matters. |
|
|
|
Post by headcase on Apr 30, 2008 19:38:15 GMT -5
It really bothers me when people say "oasis are" That's grammatically incorrect. No it's not. In England it's "Oasis are", "Arsenal are" etc in the US it's "Oasis is", "Arsenal is" etc The UK version is smarter....a group consists of many people, thus it should count as plural.... Even though I know the above, and even though i'm in the US, I still use the UK format most of the time just by habit from being raised in the UK....Never been marked off for it, I guess as long as you're consistent, it hardly matters. oh really? I'm not accustomed to the UK grammars..as you can see, I live in the states.. sorry about that |
|
|
|
Post by dearprudence on Apr 30, 2008 20:30:07 GMT -5
why don't you try this instead matle  its entertaining you know.... save us little time  |
|
|
|
Post by mimmihopps on May 1, 2008 1:23:08 GMT -5
omf... how many shit threads is one member allowed before they are shown the door? Well said. |
|
|
|
Post by Elias on May 1, 2008 7:40:13 GMT -5
In the words of the great David Byrne:
'You're talking a lot, but you're not saying anything'.
|
|
|
|
Post by themanwithnoname on May 1, 2008 8:19:24 GMT -5
Well personally I didn't think DBTT was a return to form. Thought it was a bit dull to be honest.
So for me it's:
1994 - 1996 > Most exciting band in the world and the one with the best songs
1997 - 1999 > Post-Be Here Now crisis and search for new direction
2000 - 2004 > New line-up finding their feet, hit-and-miss albums
2005 - ? > Obsession with musicianship and classic rock vibe that's a bit uninspiring
I hope the new album sees them go back to doing what they do best - churning out timeless, radio-friendly, Noel-written guitar pop.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 1, 2008 23:24:06 GMT -5
omf... how many shit threads is one member allowed before they are shown the door? you're the fool a few months ago saying since the members have children and a family now they wont be making albums or touring. so much for that. at least my analysis is thought provoking, yours is just pure bullshit. Analysis? Thought provoking? Am I reading a different thread? |
|
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5