|
|
Post by start at the end on Apr 9, 2008 8:09:30 GMT -5
Not that it should surprise anyone here, but the Rolling Stoned managed to completely omit Oasis' upcoming 2008 release from their 65 album "Spring Preview" (yes, albums due for release well into the Fall are covered).
That's 65 albums, no mention of Oasis.
That said, I'm sure you'll be relieved to learn that (amongst other heavy hitting hit-makers) Ne-Yo, Motley Crue, Ashlee Simpson, Dr. Dog, Lil' Wayne, and ZZ Top all have LP's that will surely alter the popular music landscape.
Not that I really care, but this magazine just continues its downward spiral into the meaningless oblivion. With its insatiable appetite for musical drivel, its mindless bush/conservative hating propoganda, and its general skewing/misunderstanding of virtually every social issue known to man, it has become simultaneously un-nerving and humorous to scan... and you thought they were JUST a music magazine!
|
|
|
|
Post by VanCityOasis on Apr 9, 2008 9:58:02 GMT -5
I would recommend that you do not waste any time with those fools over at rolling stone. If Oasis manages to stir up some buzz, you'd be sure to find rolling stone drooling all over them and sticking them on the cover again. My personal opinion is that the magazine has absolutely no integrity or continuity to their perspective. They jump all over what is hot right now and ignore everything else. It may be a sensible decision business wise but it truly alienates those who have a real passion for music. My two cents.
|
|
|
|
Post by mercury3164 on Apr 9, 2008 11:55:13 GMT -5
i just wrote a letter,i am outraged at this.
|
|
|
|
Post by ash on Apr 9, 2008 12:11:38 GMT -5
i just wrote a letter,i am outraged at this. uhh whats the best thing that you think is gonna happen? |
|
|
|
Post by bwilder on Apr 9, 2008 13:55:55 GMT -5
August/September is not in the Spring, therefore- not in the Spring preview. Rolling Stone magazine does suck, however...
|
|
|
|
Post by mercury3164 on Apr 9, 2008 14:49:43 GMT -5
i just wrote a letter,i am outraged at this. uhh whats the best thing that you think is gonna happen? what's the difference fool? it took me a minute to write and maybe they will read it. if you know anything about the magazine, you'd know they have an entire section called "correspondence: Love letters and advice" where they post some complaints that they received from readers about previous issues. |
|
|
|
Post by novascotialad on Apr 9, 2008 17:14:59 GMT -5
Rolling Stone magazine would suck a cock a mile long with a snowball on the end of it.
|
|
|
|
Post by eddie on Apr 10, 2008 0:43:48 GMT -5
I would say Rolling Stone truely sucks.  Sorry for repeating the above-mentioned... |
|
|
|
Post by nyr401994 on Apr 10, 2008 1:20:56 GMT -5
when your favorite band's album doesn't have a release date yet, you may be overreacting.
|
|
|
|
Post by fantasychicken on Apr 10, 2008 10:44:58 GMT -5
Hopefully Frank Lomax will be able to sort us out with a leaked version of the Lil' Wayne album.
Just out of interest (U.S. guys can help here).... who the bastard hell is Li' Wayne???
And Dr. Dog??
|
|
|
|
Post by mercury3164 on Apr 10, 2008 11:10:27 GMT -5
Hopefully Frank Lomax will be able to sort us out with a leaked version of the Lil' Wayne album. Just out of interest (U.S. guys can help here).... who the bastard hell is Li' Wayne??? And Dr. Dog?? I live in the US, and i have not a fucking clue who those people are....I have heard the name Li' Wayne i think though maybe once or twice and just thought, wat the fuck? |
|
|
|
Post by ash on Apr 10, 2008 18:10:47 GMT -5
uhh whats the best thing that you think is gonna happen? what's the difference fool? it took me a minute to write and maybe they will read it. if you know anything about the magazine, you'd know they have an entire section called "correspondence: Love letters and advice" where they post some complaints that they received from readers about previous issues. so what who really cares apart from sad oasis fans |
|
|
|
Post by mercury3164 on Apr 10, 2008 18:21:39 GMT -5
what's the difference fool? it took me a minute to write and maybe they will read it. if you know anything about the magazine, you'd know they have an entire section called "correspondence: Love letters and advice" where they post some complaints that they received from readers about previous issues. so what who really cares apart from sad oasis fans you can kiss my dick, vaginafuck |
|
|
|
Post by ash on Apr 11, 2008 2:05:25 GMT -5
so what who really cares apart from sad oasis fans you can kiss my dick, vaginafuck lol very good, its what i get for trying to point out to a 14 year old that he needs a life |
|
|
|
Post by letforeverbenever2 on Apr 27, 2008 13:07:35 GMT -5
i live in the US. rolling stone sucks.
I spend $10 an issue for mojo and your other mags.
|
|
|
|
Post by mimmihopps on Apr 28, 2008 9:36:42 GMT -5
Am I the only one here who doesn't buy any music paper? They're not very cheap and most of them aren't worth for the money.
|
|
|
|
Post by LlAM on Apr 28, 2008 12:32:32 GMT -5
Not that it should surprise anyone here, but the Rolling Stoned managed to completely omit Oasis' upcoming 2008 release from their 65 album "Spring Preview" (yes, albums due for release well into the Fall are covered). That's 65 albums, no mention of Oasis. That said, I'm sure you'll be relieved to learn that (amongst other heavy hitting hit-makers) Ne-Yo, Motley Crue, Ashlee Simpson, Dr. Dog, Lil' Wayne, and ZZ Top all have LP's that will surely alter the popular music landscape. Not that I really care, but this magazine just continues its downward spiral into the meaningless oblivion. With its insatiable appetite for musical drivel, its mindless bush/conservative hating propoganda, and its general skewing/misunderstanding of virtually every social issue known to man, it has become simultaneously un-nerving and humorous to scan... and you thought they were JUST a music magazine!  |
|
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5