|
|
Post by NoelandMeMay29 on Jun 5, 2005 23:08:19 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by rockandroll on Jun 5, 2005 23:38:39 GMT -5
That's great....although I don't know why some people doesn't have DM or WTSMG yet....they should know better by now...
|
|
|
|
Post by thebluesgnr on Jun 5, 2005 23:51:40 GMT -5
That's great....although I don't know why some people doesn't have DM or WTSMG yet....they should know better by now... WHAT? Are you saying you DON'T buy another copy of these two albums at least once a month for hanging on a wall? I call it my wonderwall... |
|
|
|
Post by NoelandMeMay29 on Jun 5, 2005 23:57:39 GMT -5
I bet some poeple are buying the other 3 again (apart from DBTT) b/c the setlist includes songs from those albums and they want to know them as they hear them.
No SOTSOG or BHN on the set list so maybe not being bought.
Just a small theory.
Oh also I just read NY times review of X&Y and it got SLAMMED!!!!!
review is posted on inet.
|
|
|
|
Post by shakermaker00 on Jun 6, 2005 0:23:17 GMT -5
dbtt is opening up the music to new fans who didnt get around buying the album the first time because they were too young, too townie twat or on smack.
also people who lost their album and have forgotten bout them were reminded about oasis again and finally the smart buy or whatever they're called bins at the music stores are doing their job too.
the excact same thing happens with every mayor release btw.
|
|
|
|
Post by masterplan200 on Jun 6, 2005 1:29:03 GMT -5
Eh??? Confused
|
|
|
|
Post by LostTacoVendor on Jun 6, 2005 2:49:29 GMT -5
Heathen Chemistry? THE HORROR
|
|
snowman
Madferrit Fan
twinkies for breakfast
Posts: 66
|
Post by snowman on Jun 6, 2005 2:54:35 GMT -5
i for one love heathen chemistry.
|
|
|
|
Post by gastritispanic on Jun 6, 2005 6:39:57 GMT -5
Remember to write "bad by oasis standards" if you have something negative to say.
If you don't I might misunderstand like: this oasis tune is bad and therefore this u2 tune is better. Let me repeat "bad, but by oasis standards"
Make it crystal clear, If you don't I might start to hate you.
|
|
|
|
Post by Guess God Thinks I'm Cain on Jun 6, 2005 7:45:07 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by NoelandMeMay29 on Jun 6, 2005 13:52:54 GMT -5
Talked to a friend on Sat night. He didn't know new Oasis was out so he was excited, anyway he raved about HC and I told him how a lot of Oasis fans don't like it.
I think it's great. I listen to that way more than BHN. Although I like it too. BHN has great songs but I never can play the album start to finish unless I have an hour and a half to kill.
Anyway. 4 in the top 75 amazing.
|
|
|
|
Post by MG on Jun 6, 2005 18:23:41 GMT -5
great acheivement, well done lads
|
|
|
|
Post by homer on Jun 7, 2005 3:33:31 GMT -5
The reason people would still be buying the older albums is, for WTS and DM a good few would only have them on tape. CD players where very new and expensive around '95.
|
|
|
|
Post by rob on Jun 7, 2005 4:56:02 GMT -5
CD players where very new and expensive around '95.?
wasnt that long ago man!
|
|
|
|
Post by Dominic on Jun 7, 2005 5:01:49 GMT -5
oasis have 3 albums above kelly osbornes new one then wahahhaha
|
|
|
|
Post by Dominic on Jun 7, 2005 5:03:22 GMT -5
morning glory sold more than U2 and loads of popular rnb acts as well as final straw - thats impressive
|
|
|
|
Post by Dominic on Jun 7, 2005 5:04:39 GMT -5
coldplay has 2 albums in the top 75 and U2 3 but oasis positions are far far more impressive
|
|
|
|
Post by Dominic on Jun 7, 2005 5:08:19 GMT -5
sorry to post like 5 in a row - but look oasis have 3 albums above the brand new motley crew album, and 4 above G4 - this is very very impressive
|
|
|
|
Post by feckarse on Jun 7, 2005 9:00:22 GMT -5
Remember to write "bad by oasis standards" if you have something negative to say. If you don't I might misunderstand like: this oasis tune is bad and therefore this u2 tune is better. Let me repeat "bad, but by oasis standards" Make it crystal clear, If you don't I might start to hate you. Little James is bad. I Can See A Liar is bad. period. |
|
|
|
Post by thebluesgnr on Jun 7, 2005 11:32:24 GMT -5
'Little James' is a good song, 'I Can See A Liar' is a great rocker. In fact I think if it was a B-side now (like Eyeball Tickler) everyone would go "Why is it not on the album?"
Instead of "period." you should have used "I think", don't you think?
|
|
|
|
Post by feckarse on Jun 8, 2005 3:42:07 GMT -5
'Little James' is a good song, 'I Can See A Liar' is a great rocker. In fact I think if it was a B-side now (like Eyeball Tickler) everyone would go "Why is it not on the album?" Instead of "period." you should have used "I think", don't you think? nope, i think Magic Pie is a bad song which drags on far too long in my opinion. but Little James and I Can See A Liar are bad songs. |
|
|
|
Post by shakermaker00 on Jun 8, 2005 3:45:44 GMT -5
magic pie is mega. sounds like a song bout the prettiest vagina in town megaaaa
|
|
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5
Nov 4, 2024 5:04:30 GMT -5