|
Post by bwilder on May 31, 2005 17:05:07 GMT -5
Alright, let me set this up for you guys. The Boston Globe is one of the most influential, widely-read daily newspapers in the United States. It's behind I believe the New York Times and the Los Angeles Times. So I walk into my local corner store to buy the paper, like I do every morning before work, and who do I see on the cover above the headlines? A picture of Liam and Noel with the headline: A WELCOME OASIS: In new CD, British band leaves troubles behind." Naturally, I began freaking out and immediately began to flip to the Arts and Entertainment section where on the cover was a color photo of Noel playing guitar at Glastonbury last year. Over the photo is the heading: Believe it: Oasis' drought is over By Joan Anderman Here's the review: The British rock band Oasis, led by famously feuding siblings Liam and Noel Gallagher, skyrocketed to stardom in the mid-90's with the stellar discs "Definitely Maybe" and "(What's The Story) Morning Glory?" and spent the next ten years in a grim free fall. Bloated production, uneven songwriting, misguided forays into electronica, and the defection of two founding members all contributed to the band's remarkable tumble from rock royalty to tabloid fodder. Buzz on the band's sixth studio album, "Don't Believe The Truth," in stores today, was hardly encouraging. Tracks from studio sessions with electronica group Death In Vegas, the project's original producers, were scrapped. Then Oasis' second drummer, Alan White, left the band. He was replaced by Zak Starkey, Ringo Starr's son, suggesting that the Gallaghers were slipping further still into the Beatles obsession that has brought them so much criticism. All of which makes the arrival of "Don't Believe The Truth" a geniune thrill. While the album doesn't recapture the euphoria of the early Oasis catalog, it's a return to swaggering form: crackling with energy, drenched in hooks, and bristling with roughish charm. Oasis, and Liam Gallagher in particluar, is still fixated on the Beatles, which, frankly, always struck this writer as more of a gift than an affliction. The singer penned three excellent tracks- the psychedelic pop anthem "Love Like a Bomb," the sneering, dogged "The Meaning Of Soul," and a strummed-and-shaken meditation called "Guess God Thinks I'm Abel"- establish his heretofore elusive songwriting credentials. Guitarist and chief tunesmith Noel whittled his own set of contributions down to five, four of which he insisted on singing, but they aren't the filler he's been stuffing the last three albums with. "Mucky Fingers" defines the album's stomping, insistent tone, which grows rambling and heady on the disc's first single, "Lyla" (the United Kingdom's top selling single last week), and turns into a cheeky Kinksian romp on "The Importance Of Being Idle." Guitarists Andy Bell and Gem Archer, who joined Oasis in 2000, are finally certified as full band members, and deservedly so. Bell's gargantuan, disc-opening "Turn Up The Sun" and Archer's "A Bell Will Ring" are as brash and tuneful as anything here- fine material for Liam's beautifully rude vocals. They also get credit for a textural tuneup that gives "Don't Believe The Truth"-and Oasis- a much-needed jolt of good old psych-rock atmosphere. It may be foolish to attach any special meaning to the siblings' earnest duet on the album's stately closer, "Let There Be Love." But the soft-hearted and the hopeful will take comfort in the sound of Noel singing "just remember I'll be by your side" to his rabble-rouser of a little brother. In the fact, the whole album sounds like a retreat from the provocation and rivalry that has dwarfed, if not actually thwarted, Oasis' music in recent years. This one is a big wet kiss for the fans-and family members- who've stuck around.
Spot on review!!! Oasis rules!!
|
|
|
Post by gastritispanic on May 31, 2005 17:10:56 GMT -5
Love it!!
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2005 17:12:36 GMT -5
fuckin ace
|
|
|
Post by doggboy10 on May 31, 2005 17:20:46 GMT -5
Good lad, glad to see somone reviewing it for what it is (a truely wonderful album) and not just the usual oasis have lost it i couldn't be bothered to listen to it but its probably gonna be shit so thats what i'll write attitude. Dunno who wrote it but he seems like a genuine music critic, someone who actualy listens and pays attention not just writes about music, any tosser can do that.
Cheers
doggboy
|
|
|
Post by bwilder on May 31, 2005 21:14:52 GMT -5
The critic's name is Joan Anderman. She can be reacged at anderman@globe.com I already sent her a glowing e-mail telling her that she nailed it, especially the part where she writes that Oasis' fixation on the Beatles is a gift not an affliction. Great and very accurate review.
|
|