|
Post by Gifford on May 29, 2005 10:15:25 GMT -5
LIAM GALLAGHER has slammed reports the new OASIS album DON'T BELIEVE THE TRUTH took three years to create, because if it had taken that long her would have quit the band. The wildman rocker dismisses claims Oasis have been working continuously on the new disc since their last album HEATHEN CHEMISTRY was released in 2002. He says, "It didn't take three years to record. When we actually started recording it in America, it took us two months. "We work pretty quickly, sometimes three songs in a day. "If it had taken us three years to record I wouldn't be here, I'd be looking for another job." 29/05/2005 14:37 www.contactmusic.com/new/xmlfeed.nsf/mndwebpages/gallagher%20oasis%20album%20didnt%20take%20three%20years
|
|
|
Post by belgallagher on May 29, 2005 10:27:35 GMT -5
really? dunno what to think now about how much they care about the band what did they do the other two years?
|
|
|
Post by Gifford on May 29, 2005 10:33:16 GMT -5
well after hc they had a year off, then they worked with death in vegas then went to the u.s.
|
|
Nazz
Madferrit Fan
Posts: 88
|
Post by Nazz on May 29, 2005 20:10:50 GMT -5
That sounds about right.
HC was released in 2002 wasn't it? Then they went on tour for about 18 mths or so. I saw them in Sydney in early 2003 and they still had a few more dates to do in Europe afterwards.
I imagine the HC tour would've finished around mid to late 2003 , probably around August. Then they took a yr off to recover , have a "life" and write material for the new album which means they would've started pre-production for the DBTT around August 2004.
It all sounds about right to me.
|
|
|
Post by RnRstar on May 29, 2005 20:13:20 GMT -5
Yer maybe they were taking time off for themselves? I'd understand that
|
|
jtmOBX
Oasis Roadie
"There we were... Now here we are."
Posts: 355
|
Post by jtmOBX on May 29, 2005 20:16:07 GMT -5
Yeah, I couldnt really imagine it taking 3 years. That doesnt really fit into the Oasis way. Sounds right, and I (personally) am glad it did not take 3 years.
|
|
|
Post by belgallagher on May 29, 2005 20:18:42 GMT -5
well after hc they had a year off, then they worked with death in vegas then went to the u.s. you are right, didn't think about that ;D
|
|
|
Post by MSprague01 on May 30, 2005 0:10:08 GMT -5
And remember that they were working with Death in Vegas and decided that they didn't have good enough songs, so they had to take time to go back and write some better songs before they started working with Dave Sardy.
|
|
|
Post by shakermaker00 on May 30, 2005 2:11:30 GMT -5
i think the press or whoever are refering to the gap inbetween the last album and this one.... so it did take them 3 years to record it, didn't it? the gap between albums really is getting bigger, but so is the responsibility for them in their private lifes. they have achieved everything and they deserve a fuckin break
|
|