|
Post by castlecraver on May 4, 2005 11:25:57 GMT -5
www.drownedinsound.com/articles/11990Liam: You've got to progress, but it doesn't mean to say you've got to go forward. Noel: Eh? Liam: You can progress sideways. Or backwards. I'm right. Tell me I'm not. Noel: Progression is going forwards. Going backwards is regression. Going sideways is just gression. So the brothers Gallagher wittily quipped in a 1994 press conference; but who knew they’d stick so rigidly to what they said. 10 years after the fantastic ‘...Morning Glory’ album, rather than sticking out a re-release, Oasis have decided to pull their socks up and release a new album. As the first single from forthcoming studio album No. 6 ‘Don’t Believe The Truth’, ’Lyla’ is also their first since the 90’s to have the old Oasis logo plastered on it’s cover, suggesting that it’s the band’s biggest return to the sound of their golden age. Gallagher the elder has talked it up as “The Who...the poppiest thing we’ve done since 'Roll With It'...specifically designed for pogoing”, but as with any N. Gallagher hyperbole (anyone remember Proud Mary?), it’s also a major, though not entirely unexpected, disappointment. ‘Lyla’ is no ‘Roll With It’ - hell, it’s no ‘Hindu Times’, but whereas that single had swagger and purpose, this one just plods; “I’ve waited for a thousand years for you to come and blow me out my mind,” Liam sings in his trademark sneer, just before the predictably ‘anthemic’ chorus begins. With Noel cribbing chords from both his own ‘Hindu Times’ and his beloved Stone Roses’ ‘I Am The Resurrection’, as well as penning his usual cliché-laden lyrics (“The star’s about to fall...heaven help me, catch me if I fall,” indeed), ‘Lyla’ sounds like an Oasis parody, or worse, an Oasis tribute band trying to write their own song. It’s their least interesting single since ‘Who Feels Love’, and if this is the most immediate thing on the album, they may have been better off reissuing ‘...Morning Glory’ after all. Now what was it you were saying about progress, Liam? And there's a bunch of tossers on the comment board below the review talking shit on Oasis... I got a good mind to go over there and set them all straight... just don't have the energy today
|
|
|
Post by mannyunderscorec44 on May 4, 2005 11:40:47 GMT -5
Well, it's actually all true. Bits are cribbed and the lryic is shit. But the reviewer hasn't heard the whole album, which is miles better than Lyla.
|
|
|
Post by rubbersoulll on May 4, 2005 11:43:18 GMT -5
that´s the point: it´s not what you say, but HOW you say... i totally agree with the opinion ABOUT THE SONG: lyla is crap... ok, it isn´t crap in a linkin park mean of the word (TOTALLY crap), but it´s a oasis crap song... i really hated it... the other 10 songs of the album are very, very better than it...
BUT u can see that the reviewer isn´t criticizing the song; he is criticizing the band, he uses his opinion about the song to say to everyone that he HATES the band... that´s why i agree when you say the reviewer is a tosser...
|
|
|
Post by castlecraver on May 4, 2005 12:08:39 GMT -5
Yeah, I mean, if you don't like the song, that's fine. I just don't understand how you can talk shit about a band that just got done selling out massive arenas all around the world man, like you have no idea why anyone might still give a shit about the biggest rock band to come out of Britian since the Beatles? Fuck!
|
|