|
Post by jilliam on Jun 14, 2005 12:20:59 GMT -5
Just read NME.COM and those co.cksuckers are saying that Liam walked out during HALF the gig. WTF? He played like 10songs and then bailed. Noel did the last 3 songs. Fucking assholes!!!
|
|
|
Post by castlecraver on Jun 14, 2005 12:29:13 GMT -5
Just goes to show this whole thing is getting blown WAY out of proportion, both in the media and in fan forums...
|
|
|
Post by Gifford on Jun 14, 2005 16:09:44 GMT -5
oh well thats better, i though they played like 4 or 5 songs then liam bailed. its still not good that liam left, but at least he did 10 or so songs
|
|
|
Post by feckarse on Jun 14, 2005 16:34:02 GMT -5
Just read NME.COM and those co.cksuckers are saying that Liam walked out during HALF the gig. WTF? He played like 10songs and then bailed. Noel did the last 3 songs. Fucking assholes!!! i couldn't give a toss myself about NME being three songs out in their description liams a twat for walking off stage and that's that
|
|
|
Post by zunoasis on Jun 14, 2005 18:23:31 GMT -5
I'm not so much concerned about where in the show he walked off, but rather the fact that he did walk off.
|
|
|
Post by thebluesgnr on Jun 14, 2005 20:24:26 GMT -5
I'm not so much concerned about where in the show he walked off, but rather the fact that he did walk off. Good for you, but the point of this thread is that NME.com is lying.
|
|
|
Post by feckarse on Jun 15, 2005 3:39:59 GMT -5
I'm not so much concerned about where in the show he walked off, but rather the fact that he did walk off. Good for you, but the point of this thread is that NME.com is lying. it's not really a bad lad lie tho'... It got the general point across it's not like they said liam stormed off stage and proceeded to make love to a beautiful man, is it?!
|
|
|
Post by chocolate st*rfish on Jun 15, 2005 6:29:03 GMT -5
i couldn't give a toss myself about NME being three songs out in their description liams a twat for walking off stage and that's that the last statement hurts but youre right with both!
|
|
|
Post by Cidaror on Jun 15, 2005 11:52:49 GMT -5
How d'you know he didn't have a good reason for walking off?
|
|
|
Post by thebluesgnr on Jun 15, 2005 12:56:52 GMT -5
it's not really a bad lad lie tho'... It got the general point across it's not like they said liam stormed off stage and proceeded to make love to a beautiful man, is it?! A lie is a lie, and when it's a journalist lying then it's a BIG lie. The people who don't know what really happened will think the audience was ripped off, when in fact the set had two songs (RNR Star, My G) replaced by one (LBL). Hardly the same thing as being left with Noel for half the show.
|
|
|
Post by Superguiller. on Jun 15, 2005 13:26:52 GMT -5
Everyone's making a big deal out of it and it's nothing, nothing! He sang his songs and he left, the sound wasn't good so he got pissed, and that's that, then Noel sang his songs and the gig ended. What's the fooking problem?
|
|
|
Post by feckarse on Jun 15, 2005 16:26:45 GMT -5
Everyone's making a big deal out of it and it's nothing, nothing! He sang his songs and he left, the sound wasn't good so he got pissed, and that's that, then Noel sang his songs and the gig ended. What's the fooking problem? liam was still meant to sing more songs, the set list changed as a result of him marching off my problem is that however many thousand people spent €60 on a ticket each to see Oasis and liam can't be arsed stayin for the whole show... the guy's a millionaire 'cos of the fans money, there's a responsibilty to do his best to put on a good show, and not storm off like a spoilt child still think he's slick, but his lack of giving a shite pisses me off
|
|
|
Post by thebluesgnr on Jun 15, 2005 21:54:39 GMT -5
I think he left because he DOES give a shit. If he didn't give a shit he would've stayed there singing like shit.
|
|