|
Post by Jaymes1973 on Apr 19, 2004 5:28:04 GMT -5
im sure this will have been asked before, but it always makes for a good discuccion. who is more 'oasis' liam or noel?
|
|
effinpeaz
Oasis Roadie
I solemnly swear that I am up to no good.
Posts: 415
|
Post by effinpeaz on Apr 19, 2004 6:06:12 GMT -5
eh. geez. in the spirit of rock and roll, i'd say liam. but that's because i have to choose between the two. because truthfully, oasis are the gallaghers.
but for the sake of the question, i'd go with liam. ;D
|
|
jamiet
Madferrit Fan
Posts: 57
|
Post by jamiet on Apr 19, 2004 6:26:01 GMT -5
eh. geez. in the spirit of rock and roll, i'd say liam. but that's because i have to choose between the two. because truthfully, oasis are the gallaghers. but for the sake of the question, i'd go with liam. ;D Id just like to say that I totally agree to what effinpeaz said, Oasis are the Gallaghers.
|
|
|
Post by Jaymes1973 on Apr 19, 2004 16:06:19 GMT -5
i agree with that but just wanted to c who everyone thought was more oasis!? what if liam started playing guitar live and kept writing songs like songbird!? (just a thought)
|
|
|
Post by maketradefair on Apr 19, 2004 16:51:44 GMT -5
oasis are : liam, noel, gem and andy. no one is more oasis than anyone else.. without gem and andy there would be no oasis, without liam and noel there would be know oasis. just think your question was a bit silly man.
|
|
|
Post by Jaymes1973 on Apr 20, 2004 7:32:56 GMT -5
i think what your saying is a bit 'silly' . how can u say that there would be no oasis without gem or andy? *first of all there already has been oasis without them *secondly, history has shown how easily noel and liam replace band members
|
|
|
Post by chocolate st*rfish on Apr 20, 2004 12:22:59 GMT -5
well i think mtf's point wasn't to say that there hasnt been oasis without one of the members at all but rather that it wasnt the same without them..
|
|