|
Post by webm@ster on Feb 19, 2003 11:26:59 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by kandaii on Feb 20, 2003 0:32:57 GMT -5
Liam deserves that! I don't know much about classical but some of the stuff they come up with is just amazing. Don't know how they get that stuff! And Songbird if deffinately like that!! Liam is full of surprises
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2008 14:52:35 GMT -5
what a load of crap
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2008 15:29:26 GMT -5
Then why did you bring the thread back from the dead then? Damn necro-posters
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Sept 12, 2008 15:43:49 GMT -5
Then why did you bring the thread back from the dead then? Damn necro-posters what the fuck is up with you
|
|
|
Post by Riverman on Oct 31, 2008 15:59:02 GMT -5
Liam is not like Beethoven
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Nov 1, 2008 2:05:56 GMT -5
Liam is not like Beethoven Yeah, Beethoven had better hair.
|
|
|
Post by Rebel of the Underground on Nov 1, 2008 5:50:51 GMT -5
^^lol chris martin is an idiot, if he wants to compare liam to a dead musical genius then why dont he compare him to lennon.
|
|
|
Post by nyr401994 on Nov 1, 2008 20:16:07 GMT -5
^^lol chris martin is an idiot, if he wants to compare liam to a dead musical genius then why dont he compare him to lennon. lennon had nothing on beethoven.
|
|
|
Post by Rebel of the Underground on Nov 2, 2008 10:52:37 GMT -5
^^lol chris martin is an idiot, if he wants to compare liam to a dead musical genius then why dont he compare him to lennon. lennon had nothing on beethoven. neither does liam, thats why i think liam should be compared to lennon they both are similar. beethoven is in a different league
|
|
|
Post by songbird11 on Nov 2, 2008 22:00:18 GMT -5
beatles were more popular than jesus christ so beethoven had no chance c'mon people & a big fuck off to chris martin
|
|
|
Post by nyr401994 on Nov 3, 2008 0:48:21 GMT -5
beatles were more popular than jesus christ so beethoven had no chance c'mon people & a big fuck off to chris martin of course the beatles were more popular than beethoven. that's because there was no mass communication in beethoven's time! i don't think there are any clips of beethoven on the ed sullivan show (he seemed that old, though...)
|
|
|
Post by songbird11 on Nov 3, 2008 14:05:14 GMT -5
^ Haha,none of us can change each others views it's all pointless i guess.
|
|
|
Post by PolskaBro1824 on Nov 4, 2008 1:59:27 GMT -5
Chris Martin is a f*cking dimwit for saying this, although I'm sure it was a bit of measured sarcasm. And if you have then stated you agree and it is "deserving" then you are in turn an even bigger dimwit. New thread.
|
|
|
Post by Rebel of the Underground on Nov 4, 2008 5:43:39 GMT -5
beatles were more popular than jesus christ so beethoven had no chance c'mon people & a big fuck off to chris martin i beg to dither, jesus IS MORE POPULAR than the beatles, he has more fuckin crazy fans ;D
|
|
|
Post by songbird11 on Nov 4, 2008 8:33:19 GMT -5
more people listen to oasis than beethoven so coldplay dont fit in anywhere as they're a shit band who make depressing music for the derranged
|
|
|
Post by jacksonlennon on Nov 7, 2008 0:10:03 GMT -5
^^lol chris martin is an idiot, if he wants to compare liam to a dead musical genius then why dont he compare him to lennon. lennon had nothing on beethoven. Yeah he did. He wrote lyrics
|
|
|
Post by mimmihopps on Nov 7, 2008 6:46:13 GMT -5
Roll over Beethoven, Roll with it Liam.
|
|