|
Post by lionsden® on May 3, 2005 12:52:42 GMT -5
3 out of 5 stars - Not a very serious review
I'll post it in a bit
|
|
|
Post by lionsden® on May 3, 2005 13:20:56 GMT -5
3 out of 5 stars - Not a very serious review I'll post it in a bit The britpop' bands first studio albmu since 2002's HC Features a mix of anthem rock and sentimental Beatlesesque pop. Ringo Starr's son Zak Starkey is playing the drums on their tour. Includes sequel to 1995's hit "Wonderwall" call "Wonderwhereallourfanswent?" The Gallagher Brothers don't fight at all in the making od this disc. This review is fucking pathetic
|
|
|
Post by StepOut on May 3, 2005 13:36:43 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by caro on May 3, 2005 14:33:04 GMT -5
what kind of magazine is it rock or something else?
|
|
|
Post by lionsden® on May 3, 2005 14:33:53 GMT -5
what kind of magazine is it rock or something else? Heard of Maxim magazine??? Its like that
|
|
|
Post by caro on May 3, 2005 14:40:39 GMT -5
Heard of Maxim magazine??? Its like that dont know that magazine...
|
|
|
Post by sonicidler on May 3, 2005 15:03:34 GMT -5
Stuff is a "lads" mag. There isn't enough rockers for those lunkheads. As for the quip about "wonderwherallourfans went" I reckon they all went to a sold out MSG and arena tour across the country. Not to mention the sold out Europe dates- fookin lunkhead lad muso jouros can't even organize their facts. 3 of 5 isn't really negative however.
|
|
|
Post by rtilden on May 3, 2005 15:56:43 GMT -5
Maxim's review will be better, and they will give DBTT 5 stars probs, cause they gave HC Album of the Month honors in 2002 i think
|
|
|
Post by rubbersoulll on May 3, 2005 15:57:26 GMT -5
totally agreed if a pathetic and negative review takes a 3/5, imagine what the next serious and positive reviews will say about the album...
some serious reviews of HC gave them 3/5 at the time... SOTSOG was yet worse availed...
|
|
|
Post by NoelandMeMay29 on May 3, 2005 17:04:36 GMT -5
Remember with a magazine like Stuff it will be ONE guy doing the cd reviews.
It's not a music mag. Don't sweat it.
|
|
|
Post by gastritispanic on May 3, 2005 19:46:13 GMT -5
I just need to get this out of me system. If those Rolling Stone vaginas fuck up on the next review ...I'm gonna kill them!!
|
|
|
Post by Tam on May 3, 2005 21:27:09 GMT -5
I CONCUR with you about RS GasPanic You made me laugh too (your menacing tone and sarcasm) I looked at several Rolling Stone mags today at the gym and they were QUITE LAUGHABLE ! I cld have screamed that recent one about the top 50 people in music i.e. TR from NIN ! WTF (sorry.. he's unique and all but NOT WORTHY !) How does one become a music critic BTW ? (good Q for Webby he wld know probly..) Peace, Tamara
|
|
|
Post by Gifford on May 3, 2005 23:07:39 GMT -5
yea rolling stone what the hell. my dad says that when he was my age rolling stone was the best place to find out about new music, but now they just write what people wanna hear. and that immortals issue, that got me soooo mad when radiohead was in it bt not oasis. people don't really like radiohead in the us anyways.
they'll give dbtt a 4 star review though, mark my words
|
|
|
Post by NoelandMeMay29 on May 4, 2005 0:01:33 GMT -5
There are some great new music mags out in US that we can ignore Rolling Stone. They have gotten as respectable and relevant as MTV.
|
|
|
Post by AllMyPeople on May 4, 2005 12:43:23 GMT -5
is there an email so we can tell him that his review wasn't even funny
|
|